Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DSA FAL Float Tube Review

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Robert, Apr 29, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,175
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    So as promised I ran my FAL at the latest tactical rifle match down at Pueblo West. Once I got the rifle gassed right it ran like a charm but that is a different thread.

    So over the winter break I installed one of these on my franken FAL kit gun:
    http://www.dsarms.com/SA58-FAL-Free-Float-Tube----021FFSC-A/productinfo/021FFSC/

    The install is easy enough, but you will have to remove the rear stock hand guard ring. And when I say remove I mean cut it off with tin snips or the like. They are not a true float tube like you would see on an AR but they are close. The base clamps to the barrel at the thickest part near the front of the receiver and flush to the receiver.

    There are two rods that thread into the base that act as the guides for the tube body. The end cap fits into the tube and the rods align with holes in the end cap. Once you screw on the threaded rod caps the whole thing becomes amazingly rigid and tight.

    So fast forward to the match on Sunday. We run a field position style match, meaning you are not shooting from a comfy bench off a rest the whole time. The tube made it very easy to rest on obstacles or the ports in the VTAC wall.

    Now as far as making the rifle more accurate, I am not 100% sure but I do know that it vastly reduced the barrel heat compared to the stock hand guards. And less heat means more accuracy. So no it may not be a .5 moa sniper rifle but it is easier on the hands and the obstacles. So all in all I am happy with it and the results on the rifle. I will try to get some pics of it on the rifle when I can.
     
  2. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,218
    Location:
    NW Montana
    Thanks for the update. I have one of these on order for my DSA PARA. DSA shipped the M249 pistol grip which makes for a good upgrade but the "free float" handguard is a week away. My DSA is shooting around 2" groups at 100 yards so the handguard can only improve that. I'm not expecting MOA accuracy but it's not going to make it shoot worse, and any reduction in contact between the handguard and the barrel near the gas port has to help.
     
  3. 1KPerDay

    1KPerDay Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    12,710
    Location:
    Happy Valley, UT
    sounds cool, literally. :) pics!
     
  4. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,218
    Location:
    NW Montana
    I received a DSA free float tube (021FFSC-A) yesterday and am extremely disappointed. The tube is HEAVY but I could live with that. However, after I removed the factory handguard and cut off the rear assembly cap, I discovered that there's no way the clamp can mount to the barrel. I called DSA this morning and emailed them a photo and am waiting for a call back to discuss what I consider to be very poor engineering. The clamping system simply won't work as designed so either it's a crappy design or there's something very odd (atypical) about my barrel. I have a DSA built SA58 PARA so I would have thought that their free float tube would work with their SA58. I'll post photos this evening.
     
  5. DeMilled

    DeMilled Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    340
    DSA sells three different free float tubes for three different barrel profiles.

    Do you know which profile your barrel is?
     
  6. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,175
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    Yup, mine is a standard profile... I promise pics are coming. Work is, well terrible right now.
     
  7. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,218
    Location:
    NW Montana
    Here's my barrel and the "clamp" end of the free float tube from DSA. Notice how small the area is on the non tapered section of the barrel resulting in minimal contact area between the clamp and barrel. Then notice that the screws for the clamp are well forward of the clamping section. There's no spacer between the upper and lower halves of the clamp so the halves don't want to remain parallel as the screws are tightened. As the screws are tightened, the clamp wants to separate at the rear ... duh!! I spoke with someone at DSA and will be returning the free float tube. He mentioned that it took him five or six attempts to get the clamp mounted when he tried to install a tube on an FAL. I still don't see how it's possible to get anything approaching good contact between the clamp and barrel with the current design.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  8. DeMilled

    DeMilled Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    340
    Sorry, should have been more specific when I asked the question. I was asking 1858 if he knew what barrel profile he has since he cannot get his tube mounted.

    You seemed to get your mounted just fine.
     
  9. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,175
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    Hey, my thread...

    1858, I will take mine apart tomorrow when I get home and take pics of the whole thing.
     
  10. Hopkins

    Hopkins Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    208
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I'm hoping that this type of modification can restore my FAL's previous accuracy. It vanished suddenly without an obvious reason. My gun would consistently deliver sub MOA performance with a number of different hand loads and several factory loads. Before I invest in the DSA forearm I intend to shoot the gun minus the forearm and with the hand guard ring free and loose.
    A retired gun smith who has a lot of FAL experience going way back told me once that the forearms on the stock rifles could prevent a return to a consistent battery harmony.
    The DSA page's explanation and photos of installation and design leave a lot to be desired.
     
  11. fireside44

    fireside44 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    746
    Not really sure why this would make such a difference. It has a gas block attached to the barrel so it's not like there are perfect barrel harmonics even without a handguard. The factory handguard attaches through the gas block. If you were slinging up or using a bipod it might be pulling your shots.
     
  12. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,218
    Location:
    NW Montana
    Thanks.
     
  13. Hopkins

    Hopkins Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    208
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I have sorted through the mounts, the optics, the loads and the barrel's condition with a borescope. I can eliminate all of those factors to explain away my rifle's accuracy deficiency. I know that bedding in military semi autos is infinitely more complicated than a bolt gun free floated from the recoil lug forward and attached to the receiver with pillar bedding. I am trying to determine if my barrel in a more independent state will return the rifle to a sub MOA performance.
    I wasn't referring to barrel harmonics per se. I'm more trying achieve an unfettered barrel with a repeatable state of battery.
    I have used various forearm rest points on the bench and discounted that as a factor also.
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2013
  14. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,175
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    Ok, as I promised sometime last year... PICS!
     

    Attached Files:

  15. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,175
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    To get the base on you have to take the gas tube off, take the base apart and place it on the barrel finger tight. Reinstall the gas tube and then move the base into place against the receiver then torque it down.
     

    Attached Files:

  16. Hopkins

    Hopkins Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    208
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Thanks for the photos. They illustrate the product much better than DSA does.
     
  17. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,175
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    Also, when putting the whole thing back together take the nose cap off, thread the tube around the barrel and gas tube and then reinstall the cap on the threaded rods.
     
  18. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,218
    Location:
    NW Montana
    Robert,
    Thanks for the photos which help to explain why you have a different opinion of the free float tube. I notice that the upper and lower halves of the clamp aren't parallel on your rifle either (see arrows) but I also notice that your barrel is a heavier version than mine. With your installation there's virtually no gap between the clamp and barrel at the front end whereas there's close to an 1/8" gap all the way around between the barrel and clamp on my PARA (see photo), therefore the clamp on your barrel is making contact at both ends. When you consider that the clamp is supposed to mount to the small non-tapered section of the barrel, a parallel sided cylinder, it's clear to me that this is a poor design for my barrel regardless of its "proven track record". There is simply no way to keep the clamp halves parallel as designed but that's less of a problem with your barrel than mine. DSA has seen the photos of my barrel, they built my PARA and they claim that it should work but it doesn't. Anyway, they're giving me a full refund and at this point I will happily revert to the original handguard and < 2 moa performance with factory ammunition. I'll be using the PARA on a pig hunt or two this year so < 2 moa is more than good enough.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    DSA PARA with standard barrel

    [​IMG]
     
  19. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,175
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    Holy cow that is a massive gap. It almost looks like that one is for a medium contour or bull barrel.
     
  20. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,218
    Location:
    NW Montana
    DSA supposedly shipped me the 021FFSC free float tube which is for standard and carbine contour 21", 18" and 16" barrels. DSA doesn't provide information on the dimensions of the carbine, standard, medium and bull barrels so I don't know how they differ.
     
  21. DeMilled

    DeMilled Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    340
    Well, at least you got your money back, 1858.

    It's a shame you didn't have one that matched up to the barrel you have...
     
  22. DeMilled

    DeMilled Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    340
    The general break down is that the standard is skinny all the way down the barrel, the medium is fat until it gets to the gas block and then goes skinny, the bull is fat all the way down to the muzzle.
    I don't have the numbers but that's the gist of their differences.

    Oh yeah, carbine and standard have the same profile but the carbine is shorter.



    Hope that helps someone else out there
     
  23. Comloz

    Comloz Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Messages:
    8
    So how did it finally end up?
    Do you have pics?
    I am looking for a free float tube also for my Israeli fal.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page