Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Dumb Question, But I Have A Point I'm Trying To Prove.

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by DogBonz, Dec 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DogBonz

    DogBonz Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,068
    Location:
    NJ
    Does anyone know how much a NIB Colt 1911 Pre WWII, or a Win model 70 would retail for in, say, 1940? Or, for that matter, any popular gun that is still made today.

    The reason that I ask is that a coworker and I were discussing the cost of guns. He was complaining about how much more expensive guns are, and “they sure don’t make’em like they used to”. I do agree that they are not made like the used to, but I got to thinking, and I’m betting that if you do a present value calculation using the MSRP of a gun from the 40’s or 50’, or even the 60’s, that they would be more expensive in their day’s dollars than say a new Kimber or Model 70.

    As always, any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks
     
  2. earplug

    earplug Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,735
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    Colt Peace Maker?

    I recall reading that A $20.00 gold piece would buy a Colt.
    Thats about $640.00 in todays dollars.
     
  3. Phil DeGraves

    Phil DeGraves Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,531
    According to my 1940 Shooters Bible, the standard Colt "Gubmint" is listed as being $41.75. The National Match Target Grade is $45.25 with fixed sights and $50.25 with adjustable sights. A Colt SAA is $37.75. I don't know what the inflation rate is, but comparing from the costs of things when I was a kid to now, it seems it is about the same cost (measured in amount of hours worked) now as it was then.
     
  4. Phil DeGraves

    Phil DeGraves Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,531
    A Winchester M70 sans sights is $61.80. It would seem to me that the M70 is actually LESS now than then.
     
  5. Frandy

    Frandy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,354
    Location:
    NC
    I don't know how accurate this "inflation rate" calculator is, but if it is accurate, today's guns Colts are more expensive:

    http://www.dollartimes.com/calculators/inflation.htm

    From the calculation:
    $41.75 in 1940 had about the same buying power as $595.61 in 2006.
    Annual inflation over this period was about 4.11%.

    And another way of calculating (only goes up to 2005):

    http://www.measuringworth.com/calculators/compare/
    In 2005, $41.75 from 1940 is worth:

    $581.17 using the Consumer Price Index
    $479.81 using the GDP deflator
    $1,210.90 using the unskilled wage
    $2,286.20 using the nominal GDP per capita
    $5,128.50 using the relative share of GDP
     
  6. Phil DeGraves

    Phil DeGraves Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,531
    The cost of everything else in the early sixties was about 1/10 what it is today. $20,000 for a house then, $200,000 today. $2400 for a car then, $24000 today. Gasoline at 22 cents a gallon, you get the idea. For the
    1940s, it may be closer to 15 or 20 times the cost then, to match today. In that case, most of the prices in the 1940 Shooters Bible in 40s dollars are just about the same as today's prices at today's dollars.
     
  7. Phil DeGraves

    Phil DeGraves Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,531
    Using that calculator, a new Standard model 1911 would be around $600. Since the Kimber Custom 2 in blue is about $600 new, I would say, it is roughly the same (except for Colt's SAA).
     
  8. c_yeager

    c_yeager Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    5,479
    Location:
    Seattle
    A lot of stuff is the same price. Some items, particularly those that have been outsourced or have had some "improvements" in manufacturing process are quite a bit cheaper than they used to be.

    This is especially apparent if you look at some more newly developed price-point weapons, like our current crop of lower-end pump shotguns. I dont think you could get a gun that worked so well for such a price back in the first half of the 21st century. The same could be said for pistols. They did have cheap pistols back then, but they had a tendancy to explode in the shooter's hand and were hard pressed to hit the broad side of a barn from the inside. Today they are ample cheap pistols that probably sold for the equivalent of what cheap pistols sold for back then, but our pistols do actually work pretty well and almost certainly wont injure the shooter.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page