EDC too much??

How many EDC handguns do you own and alternate carrying?

  • 1

    Votes: 28 22.0%
  • 2-3

    Votes: 63 49.6%
  • 4-5

    Votes: 23 18.1%
  • 6-7

    Votes: 6 4.7%
  • 8-9

    Votes: 2 1.6%
  • 10+

    Votes: 5 3.9%

  • Total voters
    127
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have two revolvers that are identical in terms of their operation (S&W Model 649 and Model 638); they just differ as to the materials used in their construction. Another primary EDC gun in the rotation is my semi-auto (Kahr CM9), that is somewhat similar in operation to the revolvers in that it has a DAO trigger. Occasionally I will carry a small .380, like my SIG P238 or Colt Mustang, or else something larger like my Ruger SR9c, CZ P01, Colt Officer's ACP, or Colt Commander.
 
I didn't read all the replies. I selected "4-5."

I rotate a few, but some of them use the same holster. These include a Bersa Thunder, Kel-Tec PF9, and my rarely-carried Bulgarian Makarov. The one that does not is a Charter Arms Undercover.

I carry using an IWB holster worn outside the paints, but inside the belt, which is known as inside-the-belt (ITB) carry. This requires as long a cover garment as OWB-carry does. If my shirt of choice is on the short side, a Taurus PT738 gets carried instead of any of the above.

Also, I frequently carry a second weapon. It's most-often a Kel-Tec P32 in a pocket. If the pocket is too tight, then it's a NAA mini in .22LR.
 
I'm with 460 on this one. I have five in my rotation, but all of them are DAO with no safety. They all work just the same: draw, aim, squeeze. There is nothing to get confused about.

Have two EDC choices, both are DAO revolvers. One is my primary EDC, a 38 spl. Taurus M85 (converted to DAO w/bobbed hammer). The other is a Ruger LCR 22LR, pocket carried when out doing yard work and such.

For me, having DAO revolvers with similar manual of arms is a confidence/proficiency thing. Everybody is different in their abilities, and I'm aware of my limitations.
 
Last edited:
I'm at 3. A j-frame for when I pocket carry. A semi-auto for when I'm carrying IWB. And a little NAA .22 for when I'm at home.
 
Three. Two of the same type (1911 type safety on both) carried the same way, and a J-Frame for New York reload or light carry in the same way the other two are. Worst case scenario and my mind goes when I draw, I try to swipe the safety off on a revolver.....
 
Glock 43 and Glock 43; a Glock is a Glock, switching between them is easy. Iver Johnson 1911 Hawk; I train with it, and have extensive background with 1911. In the woods, Ruger Vaqueros, 44 mag; one "old style" blue 4 5/8 bbl. one 3.5 stainless.
 
A situation in which one might have to use their gun in an SD shooting is going to be stressful and disorienting enough without the need to add a "merry-go-round" of weapons in different calibers and configurations to the mix.
Excellent advice.

Can anyone come up with a good reason for "alternating" what one carries from one day to the next?

I can understand why a need to dress differently from time to time might indicate that different firearms would be appropriate. But the guns should operate the same way, and so should the holsters.

Carrying a firearm for use as a last resort in the gravest extreme is not an appropriate excuse for making fashion statements.
 
Can anyone come up with a good reason for "alternating" what one carries from one day to the next?
I choose to ... which is a good enough reason for me. :) What others choose to do is their business.

When I started carrying 42 years ago, I had a Ruger Security Six, a PPK/s and a Colt Combat Commander, three very different pistols. I began alternating them to help maintain a comfortable level of carry familiarity with each. I quickly learned that I suffered no confusion regarding what was on my hip as I could tell by the different feel/weight of each one.

The approach still works for me, so ...
 
I "alternate" based on the season. I very much prefer a "big" pistol. When I can get away with a reasonable amount of concealment due to jackets, etc. I carry my "big" pistol. When not, I carry a large-ish subcompact. Which I shoot fine, but it isn't like my comp gun.
 
When I started carrying 42 years ago, I had a Ruger Security Six, a PPK/s and a Colt Combat Commander, three very different pistols. I began alternating them to help maintain a comfortable level of carry familiarity with each. I quickly learned that I suffered no confusion regarding what was on my hip as I could tell by the different feel/weight of each one.
Whether you consciously "suffered...confusion" is beside the point.

Certainly any of us can learn in short order how to operate and fire a P-08, a 1911, a Beretta M9, and a Ruger Security Six without experiencing any discernible effects of "confusion"--at the range.

The critical question is whether you can consistently draw, present and fire as quickly and effectively in serious defensive encounters when you are "alternating" carry pieces as you would if you did not.

Perhaps you can.

If you can test that and prove it to yourself scientifically and objectively, fine. I do not think it worth the risk.

And I can see absolutely no reason to do it.

....a Glock is a Glock, switching between them is easy.
Yep. I can see certainly why someone might choose to carry different Glocks from time to time.

I carry the same OWB holster the same way every day, and the same handgun will suffice for any occasion.

Now, if I had to dress differently from time to time and were therefore made to carry differently, I might well have to assume the risk of carrying handguns with different manuals of arms, grips, trigger pulls, etc. But only if necessary.
 
Two reasons for switching things up. Because I can. And, because I want to.
Okey dokey, but in any decision involving serious business, to ignore considerations of risk and reward would seem rather imprudent.

Freedom of choice is a wonderful thing.
With freedom comes responsibility. Even if I am only endeavoring to defend myself, there are those who depend upon me.

Of course, if we are just choosing among toys for play, and if do not really carry to defend ourselves, and it's just a game, if doesn't matter.
 
One of those perennial questions for which the "answer" lies within the individual, including considering the individual's knowledge, training, skillsets, interests, experience ... and preferences.

As a young cop I used to only carry a couple of off-duty weapons, a Commander and a Security-Six. That eventually changed into more examples of that couple of types of handguns. Similar, but different models. It continued to evolve. Why? Several influences were involved.

I could afford to buy more handguns.

I had a safe in which to store more of them (kids started toddling, so guns got safely put up out of the reach of inquisitive hands and fingers).

I had more opportunity to use a private LE range, versus the expensive public ranges.

Finally, I became trained as a LE firearms instructor, and really started to focus on training with various handguns commonly used. I shot and practiced (trained, qualified, etc) with a lot of different guns. Frequently. Repeatedly. Continually. On the agency's dime, using the agency's ammunition.

Then, I started attending various armorer training, for an ever growing variety of firearms. Even if I didn't own some of the guns of the types I helped support/repair, I got ample opportunity to handle and shoot them.

By the time I retired, I learned I had acquired a list of more than 35 handguns (as best I can recall) with which I'd qualified and had listed in my training record. I stayed on as a firearms instructor and armorer post-retirement, working as a reserve, and continued to use various guns in my capacity as an instructor and armorer, and even added to the ones I'd normally used. However, considering the records-keeping and extent of the various training records, I started to simplify the guns I used for the range, and the ones I carried as retirement weapons. The numbers listed dropped down in the 20's.

Revolvers (mostly DA/DAO, but I first learned my revolver skills on SA wheelies, and still have an affinity for them), 1911's, some models of TDA (DA/SA) and DAO-ish pistols. Pretty much the ones I still like using and having as options for retirement CCW.

Like most of us, I've long heard the old saying about "beware the man with one gun, as he might know how to use it." Well, as an instructor who has seen my fair share of cops who only owned ONE off-duty weapon, or private citizens who only owned one handgun (I helped teach classes for private citizens for about 10 years), I've had ample opportunity to develop a corollary of that old saying ...

"Beware the man/woman who only owns one gun, as he /she might not be interested enough in gun ownership, and developing shooting skills, to have learned how to safely handle it and shoot it well."

I've invested all of my adult years in the pursuit and practice of some martial arts. Not just one style, art or discipline. There are some advantages to learning to effectively use more than one.

As a firearms instructor, I've been required to be familiar and skilled using more than just one or two handguns I "liked", or was issued, including many of them which I'll never have a desire to personally own.

If someone considers themselves well versed in shooting handguns, and well served by only being familiar with one make/model/caliber, that's their prerogative. Me? I want to be able to use virtually any handgun I may have cause to pick up.

Plus, I still enjoy being able to demonstrate skill at shooting all of the handguns with which I've become familiar over the years.

So, I think of the answer to the question of "how many" as being ... "it depends", meaning on the individual. ;)
 
Last edited:
Though I have four in general "rotation", all four are drawn and fired the same way, what I call "pull, point, and press-to-play." Being left-handed gives me yet another reason not to use safety levers.

If anyone wants to turn this thread into a different one on why it's "wrong" to use different guns, have at it.
 
I carry a variety of guns, from single action revolvers to striker fired pistols. As standard practice, when I am changing the type of pistol I am carrying I do a bit of dry fire and practice draws to re-familiarize myself. However, even without doing that, when I have gone out to my backyard range to pop off a few rounds even if I have been carrying a 1911 and I am drawing a double action revolver my hand knows what is right even when my brain doesn't. Most well designed handguns seem to put your hand in the proper position, whether it is right to the trigger or to a safety that needs deactivation first.
 
I'm not a fan of the "carry rotation" and generally stick to CCW guns in "pairs"; one a compact size and the other a sub-compact for when I can't conceal the compact due to the situation/activity. The "pairs" usually operate the same. I also try to use a similar pistol in matches to what I'm carrying at the time.

I find it takes me some amount of trigger time/ammo with a pistol before I'm comfortable carrying it, which is why I don't switch often.

Chuck
 
Realistically I only really EDC about 6 on a regular basis all point and click propositions.
 
Can anyone come up with a good reason for "alternating" what one carries from one day to the next?

I can understand why a need to dress differently from time to time might indicate that different firearms would be appropriate. But the guns should operate the same way, and so should the holsters.

Carrying a firearm for use as a last resort in the gravest extreme is not an appropriate excuse for making fashion statements.

I don't alternate on a whim, but more based on what I'm doing. Most of the time I carry is when I need to get milk or something on the way home from work, so I drop a j-frame in my pocket that's kept locked up in my truck (can't carry at work). Likewise, a quick trip to the hardware store on Saturday means 40 minutes of driving and 30 minutes at the store, so I again pocket carry because I find a IWB holster uncomfortable in the car. And my family does a fair amount of hiking, and with a baby backpack on I can't carry IWB, so again the j-frame goes in my pocket.

But those times I know I'm going to be out all day shopping with the wife, I much prefer to have my P938 on my hip. It just isn't always practical.
 
I don't alternate on a whim, but more based on what I'm doing. Most of the time I carry is when I need to get milk or something on the way home from work, so I drop a j-frame in my pocket that's kept locked up in my truck (can't carry at work). Likewise, a quick trip to the hardware store on Saturday means 40 minutes of driving and 30 minutes at the store, so I again pocket carry because I find a IWB holster uncomfortable in the car. And my family does a fair amount of hiking, and with a baby backpack on I can't carry IWB, so again the j-frame goes in my pocket.
I once carried a J-Frame in my pocket fairly frequently.

Three things caused me to stop:
  1. After taking a couple of good defensive pistol shooting courses, I learned that I could not draw while moving, present, and fire as quickly and effectively from a pocket as from an OWB holster
  2. I concluded, after very careful thought, analysis, and consideration, that a five shot capacity was not really advisable for primary carry
  3. I found that the firearm I replaced it with, a good ten-shot double column sticker fired pistol. not only had a much better trigger pull, it was within fractions of an inch of the j-Frame in height, width, and length
But of course that eliminated the convenience of dropping a gun (in a pocket holster) into a pocket.

I am retired. When I cannot carry, I can keep an empty holster concealed OWB.

If I were more constrained, I would look into the possibility of acquiring a holster that can be very easily attached and removed I have not searched, and I have no recommendations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top