Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Enemy at the Gates

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by dasmi, Nov 25, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dasmi

    dasmi Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,781
    Location:
    Colorado Springs, CO
    I just watched this movie last night, and wow. That was a great flick. Ed Harris was especially good. I very much enjoyed seeing Mosin-nagants in action. My 91/30 is even more attractive to me now. The only thing I didn't like, and that I don't like about most movies, is the British, "generic foreign" accent that any non-American character in movies will use.
     
  2. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,056
    Location:
    SouthEast PA
    Read the book!

    The movie was derived from maybe 10 pages from the book, which covered the overall battle in great detail.
     
  3. Darth Ruger

    Darth Ruger Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    525
  4. dasmi

    dasmi Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,781
    Location:
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Oh, I didn't know there was a book. I'll order it now.
    Also, anyone who has played the game Call of Duty, did you notice a striking similarity to the Russian portion of the game?
     
  5. Texfire

    Texfire Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    603
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    I've read War of the Rats, excellent book. I Didn't know that Zaitsev had written his own account.
     
  6. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,723
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    Vassili was a dedicated communist, as well, but a pretty interesting guy!
    Here he is in wartime..
    Vasili_Zaitsev.gif
    And many years later...
    VassiliZaitsev.gif
     
  7. Darth Ruger

    Darth Ruger Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    525
    It was originally published in 1956, the new edition is 2003. It includes a 1941 map of Stalingrad, wartime documents and photos of him and his fellow snipers, and a short version of his experiences he put together for Russian reporters in 1942. He also tells of his growing up as a hunter in the mountains. Lots of details about his experiences fighting before he became a sniper that were left out of the movie. More info:

    http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=165720
     
  8. antsi

    antsi Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,398
    An even better book about the Stalingrad battle is "Stalingrad: The Fateful Siege" by Anthony Beevor.
     
  9. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,573
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
    Please note, in the first photo (wartime) he is wearing the Order of the Red Banner and the Bravery medal. Second photo, the Hero of the Soviet Union Gold Star medal (Solid Gold).

    Don
     
  10. entropy

    entropy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    4,306
    Location:
    G_d's Country, WI
    Indeed, he was awarded the first one before the Battle of Stalingrad was over. The reason for the accents is most of the actors were British. (Bob Hoskins, Rachel Weisz, Joseph Feinnes (Well, he's Welsh actually) and Jude Law.) Only Ed Harris was American, and had an American accent, not a German one in the movie. I still want the Left-handed PU on the cover of the DVD. ;)
     
  11. jefnvk

    jefnvk Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,938
    Location:
    The Copper Country, Michigan
    After watching many movies and playing many games, I have come to the conclusion that most game maps are built on movie scenes.
     
  12. Stauble

    Stauble Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    353
    Location:
    Tallahassee, Florida
    if any of you have played medal of honor allied assault, you will notice that that the D-day invasion is almost exacly the same as Saving Private Ryan
     
  13. MechAg94

    MechAg94 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,748
    I liked the movie, but I was put off by the apparent very short ranges at which most of the action took place. I can understand though since Hollywood thinks you have to be a sniper to shoot accurately at over 10 yards.
     
  14. MatthewVanitas

    MatthewVanitas Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,463
    Location:
    Burlington, Vermont and Montreal, Québec
    Though this is horrbly gun-geeky, the main thing that struck me from that film was the futility of firing the PPSh-41 at aircraft.

    Admittedly, even modern Field Manuals explain how to (attempt to) engage Close Air aircraft with the M16. Thankfully, this has not been an issue in my lifetime. But really now, 7.62x25mm from one individual vs. aircraft?

    But still a good film. I do reccommend that you check out the Finnish film "The Winter War", if you are into the whole Russo-military scene. I do understand that the DVD sold in the U.S. is missing about half of the material, but I still greatly enjoyed the film.

    -MV (who has fired a genuine PPSh-41, and was sorely tempted, but left in in Iraq, where it presumably well-serves a certain Iraqi National Guard unit)
     
  15. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    A lot of the sniping on the Eastern front from the Winter War on was conducted at an array of ranges including very short range. Simo Hayha used a subgun for a lot of his work. The Eastern style sniper used in Finland and the USSR was quite different from the modern US style sniper who's deployed as a kind of tactical weapon. Eastern style snipers would just set out and hunt the enemy, killing as many of as high a rank as possible while going from position to position. I don't recall too many stories of their snipers taking weeks to get into the perfect position to kill a single key political leader or general, then slowly exiting. THis is one reason their confirmed kills are so much higher than anything a US sniper has ever racked up. They just kill, kill, kill all day every day. And they had a huge impact on the battlefield.

    Another thing that surprises me is how tiny these guys were. Hayha was a little guy, and from the photo it looks like Vassili was dwarfed by his 91/30.
     
  16. MechAg94

    MechAg94 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,748
    The accounts I saw on the History Channel indicated that duel between him and the German sniper happened at a respectable range. In the movie, they should have just used pistols. I wasn't expecting some 1000 yard sniper duel in the woods, but a hundred yards wouldn't be too much to ask for would it? :)

    From what I have seen of US snipers in Vietnam, they weren't too picky about who they shot either.
     
  17. Darth Ruger

    Darth Ruger Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    525
    In his book, Zaitsev describes making several shots at 600 yards.


    Vassili also did a lot of fighting with a subgun and grenades, quite a bit of it in fact. Another detail left out of the movie.


    He was. He was a little guy. But one of his buddies was even shorter than him. :D (But that person was not included in the fictional versions.) It must have made things difficult with their hand-to-hand training.

    When they arrived at Stalingrad, they spent the first three days training for street combat, learning grenades, hand-to-hand combat, etc, before they actually went into the city. They didn't just jump off the train when they got there and run right into the battle with no weapons. On their first day of combat, Vassili's first act was to take out some machine gun nests with hand grenades. And rather than stay behind to shoot any soldiers that retreated, their Lieutenant led the charge against the Germans.
     
  18. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    It's a moral and fighting spirit thing. Armies have been doing it for almost a century (ever see anti-aircraft sights on a bolt action Arisaka?). It's better to teach the troops to fire their guns at an enemy attacked by aircraft and armor than to tell them "you don't have a hope of doing damage with your puny weapon so just hide."
     
  19. ctdonath

    ctdonath Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Messages:
    3,618
    Location:
    Cumming GA
    Elsewhere on THR...
     
  20. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    It's never been a secret that the film was highly fictionalized, so I'm not sure why that gets people worked up. OTOH I don't trust ANYTHING coming out of the heart of Stalin's empire. So claims that all the Soviets fought willingly and nobody was used as fodder don't really fly too well. As a hero of the Soviet Union, Zaitsev had a vested interest in removing any negative aspects ot the account. So while I know that the love affair was fictional, I also take his reports re. the willingness of the average Red Army Man to fight with a grain of salt.
     
  21. Darth Ruger

    Darth Ruger Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    525
    It's not about getting worked up about it, it's just a matter of pointing out that many people don't realize just how fictionalized it is.

    Those are my words someone quoted from another thread. Yes, I saw the movie, several times. It was well made, but fictional. Are you saying a fictionalized movie is a more reliable source of information than Zaitsev's own words?

    After Zaitsev was wounded, he was recovering from his temporary blindness in Moscow, and he was then sent to a meeting where he was to describe his experiences to high-ranking officers (he received his "Hero of the Soviet Union" medal shortly after that). In his own words...

    "And soon enough, I found myself in the General Staff's office. There I met for the first time with renowned snipers Vladimir Pchelintsev, Lyudmila Pavlyuchinko, and Grigory Gorelick."
     
  22. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    I'm not saying the film is a historical source of information. But most of the complaints I've heard about it have been rooted in soviet era denials that any Red Army Men were sent to the field poorly equipped or forced to fight. I respect Zaitsev's account, but I take it with a big grain of salt. This is an empire built on lies we're talking about, not some bastion of free expression. Sadly Zaitsev died before the Soviet empire collapsed. If like Hayha he'd lived beyond the cold war we could have gotten a more detailed and agitprop-free account of the battle from him. But all through his life the man had handlers and his words were subjected to layers of censorship. So by all means read his account, but always remember where it's coming from.
     
  23. Darth Ruger

    Darth Ruger Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    525
    I see your point, and I agree with you about that. I'm not trying to say his account is the gospel truth. I was just pointing out how much of Robbins' book and the movie was changed to make a good story out of it. The political overtones probably are the result of much censorship. His book and the movie are probably the two opposite extremes regarding Communism, with the truth being somewhere in the middle. But the details of his personal life and his fighting experiences are what interest me, and the movie greatly distorts them. The politics don't really interest me that much. My point is to read his book if you want something closer to the truth regarding his combat/sniping experiences.
     
  24. antsi

    antsi Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,398
    Zaitzev himself may not have experienced the NKVD "backstop" troops gunning down Russians who retreated, but it certainly did happen. Stalin's infamous order #221, "Not a Step Backward" specified criminal penalties for the families of any soldier who was captured - some members of Stalin's own family were imprisoned for this "crime." Many soldiers were shot or sent to punishment battalions to carry out suicidal missions as punishment for fighting their way out of encirclements. The Red Army horrors depicted in the movie were not exaggerated. This is not a "truth is somewhere in the middle" issue. Under Stalin's leadership, Soviet authorities committed brutal atrocities against Red Army conscripts on a regular basis.

    Again, if you want to see credible history on this era from a serious researcher, read Anthony Beevor's book about Stalingrad.

    Also, Kruschev was the chief political officer for the Stalingrad Front. He may not have done the things portrayed in the movie, but he was certainly there.
     
  25. Beetle Bailey

    Beetle Bailey Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,240
    Location:
    California
    I'll second that. It's a very readable book that made me glad I wasn't there :uhoh: .

    But enough about reality! That movie was pretty exciting, with some very tense scenes. What was your favorite part? Mine is near the beginning, when Danilov first meets Zaitsev. "Wait 'til there's an explosion. . . :uhoh: :D "
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page