ny32182
Member
No problem JA, if everything falls apart after 5k next time that will be my new change interval.
As far as I know now I'll be shooting this same gun next year so should be into the upper 30's on it by October '13.
One more comment on this gun vs. the Glock; there is a whole lot I like about the Glock such as the size/shape/width of the frame, and even the "grip angle" that seems to cause so much knashing of teeth from many. I also like the push pins vs. the M&P roll pins, making it easier to disassemble, and also the ability to get the striker block safety out with no fanfare is nice vs. the M&P. It is also a simpler, slightly more rugged design IMO as noted above. I also think it shoots "flatter", (comes back on target quicker and smoother) than the M&P which seems to have a little more front sight bounce on the return. Push comes to shove I couldn't show that this has an impact on my shooting; it is still settled by the time I'm ready to shoot again; it is just very slightly annoying is all.
My two key issues with the Glock are that I'm a lefty (no ambi slide catch available) and also as soon as I started doing dedicated gripper/forearm exersizes to improve pistol handling, I started getting very bad slide bite off the Glock, so long term I would have had to go to a beavertail option of some kind on the Glock. The M&P has it from the factory. What I do to compensate for the super-slim frame of the M&P is to put on the SMALL backstrap without the bulbous palm bulge, and then build up the ENTIRE grip with lots and lots of grip tape all the way around. This gives a uniform increase in size vs. the large backstrap with just makes it feel like you're gripping a golf ball and still doesn't give you anything to grab on the front strap.
As far as I know now I'll be shooting this same gun next year so should be into the upper 30's on it by October '13.
One more comment on this gun vs. the Glock; there is a whole lot I like about the Glock such as the size/shape/width of the frame, and even the "grip angle" that seems to cause so much knashing of teeth from many. I also like the push pins vs. the M&P roll pins, making it easier to disassemble, and also the ability to get the striker block safety out with no fanfare is nice vs. the M&P. It is also a simpler, slightly more rugged design IMO as noted above. I also think it shoots "flatter", (comes back on target quicker and smoother) than the M&P which seems to have a little more front sight bounce on the return. Push comes to shove I couldn't show that this has an impact on my shooting; it is still settled by the time I'm ready to shoot again; it is just very slightly annoying is all.
My two key issues with the Glock are that I'm a lefty (no ambi slide catch available) and also as soon as I started doing dedicated gripper/forearm exersizes to improve pistol handling, I started getting very bad slide bite off the Glock, so long term I would have had to go to a beavertail option of some kind on the Glock. The M&P has it from the factory. What I do to compensate for the super-slim frame of the M&P is to put on the SMALL backstrap without the bulbous palm bulge, and then build up the ENTIRE grip with lots and lots of grip tape all the way around. This gives a uniform increase in size vs. the large backstrap with just makes it feel like you're gripping a golf ball and still doesn't give you anything to grab on the front strap.