Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

experience with rohrbaugh?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by texas bulldog, Mar 21, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. texas bulldog

    texas bulldog Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,013
    Location:
    Central Texas
    hey there...

    for my next gun purchase, i am looking for something that can be my daily CCW. considering my typical attire in a mostly hot climate, my thought is that if i'm going to carry it habitually, it probably needs to fit in a pocket. this leaves me looking mostly at so-called pocket autos and j-frame smiths.

    while i love revolvers, i have to admit that i shoot much more accurately with autos [at least comparing full-size versions of each]. at the same time, i'm not all that comfortable with .380 as a personal defense caliber. so looking around the net, i've come across the rohrbaugh. 9mm i could be alright with, but i'm not crazy about going with a manufacturer with such a short track record.

    can anyone out there give me a firsthand [or secondhand, i suppose] account of this gun's reliability, handling, etc. obviously, reliability is probably the foremost requirement, but other info is welcome too.

    if the rohrbaugh is not a viable choice, then i will probably just go with a j-frame. at least i can feel comfortable with the simplicty of operation and the confidence it will go BOOM! every time i ask it to.

    thanks in advance for any feedback you can give...
     
  2. Michigunner

    Michigunner Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Messages:
    91
  3. texas bulldog

    texas bulldog Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,013
    Location:
    Central Texas
    wow!

    thanks michigunner.

    it seems like the expectations they have for a $1000 gun are ridiculously low. replacing mag springs and recoil springs every few hundred rounds seems beyond excessive to me.

    looks like i need to either reconsider the .380 offerings from kel-tec, kahr, walther and others or just get my hands on the smallest reliable .357 i can find. and given my anti-.380 bias, it'll almost certainly be the latter.

    and it'll be a heck of a lot cheaper!
     
  4. GEM

    GEM Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,419
    Location:
    TX
    The PM-9 from Kahr is a 9mm x 19 and not a 380 by the way and easily pocketable with looser pants.

    Good luck - I alternated between a J and a PM-9 depending on pocket fit.
     
  5. DAdams

    DAdams Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,081
    Location:
    East Tennessee
    I have both PM9 and J Frame 642 for CCW. I just ordered a set of Crimson Trace Laser grips for the 642. See how that works out. Feedback has been good from the 642 club members.

    I am also going to purchase a MP 340 new for 2007 which is less expensive than the 360PD and contains no scandium, SS and Titanium only. Lighter than a 642 heavier than the 360s in a .357.

    If you want a diminutive and small auto I would also look at North American Arms NAA .32 manufactured by Kahr and built in collaboration with COR BON. Packs a wallop for its size. Downside, special ammo. Buy a few hundred rounds.

    http://www.naaminis.com/32NAA.html

    The 32NAA is a new cartridge/firearm 'system' designed and developed by the partnership of North American Arms and Cor-Bon Ammunition.

    In essence, the cartridge is based on a 380 case, which is necked-down to hold a smaller 32 bullet. The benefit is a remarkable gain in ballistic performance.

    According to industry expert Ed Sanow, the 32NAA:


    Produces more velocity, more energy and more stopping power than any conventional jacketed lead hollow point (JHP) 32 ACP, 380 ACP or 380 ACP (+P) with 15% less recoil (Power Factor) than the (+P),


    Penetrates 8.3" of Gelatin after passing through four (4) layers of denim, expanding to a .55" mushroom with a retained weight of 100%,


    Has a Fuller Index of 62% One-Shot Stops, compared to (for example) the 380 ACP Federal 90gr. Hydra-Shok (53%).


    Here's mine.

    P2280046.jpg
     
  6. P95Carry

    P95Carry Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    16,341
    Location:
    South PA, and a bit West of center!
    A good many aspects of the R9, including some problems are contained in my R9 FAQ ... see link in my sig line.

    It's a thorobred gun and has not been without a few problems - but if we allow for high cost ''loaded'' guns also having problems sometimes, it helps put things in perspective.

    As a pocket 9mm I believe it is right up there despite cost - but the new .380 version could well be the better choice because when things get this small with a less than pure mouse cal - it is hard to make it all work very easily.
     
  7. mavracer

    mavracer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,450
    Location:
    wichita
    642/442

    get a smith 642 or 442 with crimson trace grips, a safariland comp 1 speed loader,1000 rounds of practice ammo and a couple hundred speer 135 gold dots add a desantis nemisis pocket holster and your set BTW you'll have enough left over to take SO out to dinner:)
     
  8. thirty-thirty

    thirty-thirty Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    178
    I love the P9 Kahr. You have to look at how thin they are, you'll love it. They are easy to hide.
     
  9. jlh26oo

    jlh26oo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,053
    If you'll notice in that thread, I refused to accept it as well, but you meant:

     
  10. Michigunner

    Michigunner Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Messages:
    91
    Chris made a good point about other guns.

    I didn't like having to break-in my PM9 with 200 rounds, and the Kimber with 400 rounds.

    My brand new Beretta 92FS 9mm Inox could not fire three straight shots without jamming during CCW class. It was quite a sight.
     
  11. Michigunner

    Michigunner Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Messages:
    91
  12. obxned

    obxned Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,490
    Location:
    OBX, NC
    For the price of the Rohrbaugh, I would buy a NNA min-revolver, a KelTeck P3AT, AND a KelTec PF9 or Kahr P9. I would still have a fat wad of money left over.
     
  13. rolltide

    rolltide Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Messages:
    256
    When I was researching a similar choice of pocket gun, there were some significant factors to keep in mind.

    1. The 38spl and 357 loose a LOT of ballistics in the tiny barrel pocket models, (the 38spl in a snub is generally is in the same ballpark as the 32acp and 380 in terms of stopping power.) I do not have any reliable data on the 357 out of a snub. Some rounds retain ballisitics well even when the barrels are short, 357sig and 40s&w are among the better performers for short barrels.

    2. Given diminished ballistics, repeat shots are a foregone conlcusion with a pocket gun. Therefore, recoil recovery speed and reload speed are significant factors to consider for a pocket gun. This made me eliminate the 38 and 357 from my consideration.

    My final choices were a NAA 32acp for true pocket carry and an AMT Backup in 40s&w or 357sig for larger pocket carry. I chose steel guns because they seem more durable and more controlable in smaller packages. I bellieve the 32 to be the equal of the 380 and the 38 in pocket size guns, and the 40s&w and the 357sig to be superior to the 357mag IN A POCKET SIZE GUN. Bigger guns is a whole other story.

    I mostly carry the AMT Backup in 40s&w now days and it is what I qualified with for my CCW. There are situations where I will carry the 32, but I am aware of the diminished ballistics and make appropriate tactical adjustments. Although the AMT Backup will fit in most of my pockets, it is heavy for pocket carry and there is a significant bulge (probably about the same size bulge as a pocket revolver though.) I carry it in a belt pouch a lot. If I must be more discreet, I carry the 32 or use the slower to draw but almost invisible belly band carry for the AMT in a Thunderwear position.

    Just my 2 cents

    Roll Tide
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page