Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Eyes and supplements questions

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Harve Curry, Jan 21, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Harve Curry

    Harve Curry Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,756
    Location:
    Black Range of New Mexico
    As it pertains to being able to shoot good and see your sights, the target whatever it may be. What is new in taking care of our eye health.
    Eye read that Billberry , Lutien are good for your eyes. Any truth to that?
    Also eye glass wearers have protection from the suns harmful rays.
    What does knowledgeable folks on THR say?
     
  2. Just Jim

    Just Jim Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,099
    In the long run stay away from sugar. It is a toxin to your body and can ruin your eyes with Diabetes. It is soon to kill more people than aides.

    jj
     
  3. Kingcreek

    Kingcreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,790
    Location:
    at the center of my own little universe
    Billberry is helpful if it is properly processed, stabilized, and stored. So are some other fruits and berries. There are some great herbals but most of the market is flooded with junk. Just Jim is absolutely right about sugar, especially evil is the high fructose corn syrup that is in so many processed junk foods.
    Don't get sucked in to the synthetic nutrient movement. Almost all "vitamin" supplements are synthetic fractions. (example: the FDA says that only ascorbic acid can be called "vitamin C" yet it represents only about 10% of the known vitamin C complex.) In the long term, these fractions may cause more harm than good.
    What's new in nutritional supplements? Nothing. The only real nutrition comes from fresh whole foods just like it always has. Fresh fruits and veggies, lots of variety and color. They are the best sources of real nutrients, essential co-factors, trace minerals etc.
     
  4. Khornet

    Khornet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,861
    Location:
    NH
    Actually,

    sugar is not a "toxin" and won't hurt your eyes *unless you have diabetes*.

    I'm not aware of any supplements which have been shown to benefit eyesight except in cases of actual eye disease such as glaucoma.

    As far as diet goes, eating three squares of a well-balanced diet is all you really need, as long as you don't have any diseases which cause nutrient deficiencies.
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2008
  5. Kingcreek

    Kingcreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,790
    Location:
    at the center of my own little universe
    Actually, high insulin is damaging to blood vessels by causing thickening, promoting oxidation of LDLs, increased fibrinogen, increased BP, etc. So indirectly, sugar is atleast somewhat responsible wether we call it a "toxin" or not. I tend to think of it as an "anti-nutrient" as it leads to depletion of some other nutrients (high insulin drives the kidneys to waste magnesium and potassium and retain sodium and water and causes excess sugar to be converted to triglycerides)
    I know this thread is wandering a little.
    I stand by my previous reply and quote myself:

    What's new in nutritional supplements? Nothing. The only real nutrition comes from fresh whole foods just like it always has. Fresh fruits and veggies, lots of variety and color. They are the best sources of real nutrients, essential co-factors, trace minerals etc.

    and I was not excluding fresh meat, eggs, nuts, etc.
     
  6. Chuckulator

    Chuckulator Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2005
    Messages:
    88
    Location:
    A Buckeye in MI
  7. B yond

    B yond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,270
    Just eat your carrots.
     
  8. Just Jim

    Just Jim Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,099
    Sugar is a toxin in the amount Americans eat. In one can of Pepsi there is a quarter cup of sugar. Diabetes in 1985 had 5 million victims, in 2003 17 million and it's all because there is too much sugar put in our foods. Eat only natural sugar or you may get diabetes and go blind or worse.

    jj
     
  9. Atticus

    Atticus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,794
    Location:
    Ohio
  10. Harve Curry

    Harve Curry Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,756
    Location:
    Black Range of New Mexico
    As we get older our eye sight changes. For whatever aging reason it seems to directly affect eyesight about 45-50 years old. Are any of the supplements for older eyes worth buying? Younger people might get along fine with three squares a day.
     
  11. AK103K

    AK103K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    5,774
    I crossed over the 50 year mark three years ago. I've been wearing glasses on a daily basis, and going in for regular check ups (and up grades) for about 25 years up until last summer. I trashed my photo gray, progressive bifocals at work and could not get anywhere to get a new set at the time, so I just started wearing my safety/sunglasses instead. I still havent got a replacement for the prescription lenses, and I dont think I'm going to bother. So far, other than trying to read small print, up close, I havent missed them at all, and I actually feel like my eyes are actually better. I picked up a set of the cheap reading glasses, not even a strong set, 1.25's, and the up close stuff has been fine.

    I've often wondered if going to the eye doctor and continually upping the prescription wasnt a counterproductive thing, and so far, I think I was right.
     
  12. v35

    v35 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    728
    Location:
    V35 Family Compound, Bucks County, Pennsylvania
    Supplements are fine, but don't forget exercise

    I have been taking the ocular nutrition supplement from hi-health, and I do believe it makes a difference. It's basically a concoction of lots and lots of antioxidants along with amino acids, Lutein and herbs. I do not take the recommended dose of 4 capsules per day; I prefer just one or two.

    I've noticed I have a noticeably higher tolerance for bright light with the supplement. Without it I take much longer to get accustomed to darkness after being exposed to bright light. In any event, I've found it a good general supplement, and I've been taking it for years. My eyes are perfectly healthy.

    The retina needs copious amounts of oxygen to function. Anything that limits oxygen saturation or impairs your circulation is going to affect your eyes before anything else. Exercise has obvious benefits. Smoking is just as obviously out of the question.

    While reading glasses eventually become necessary for almost everyone as the lens loses its ability to focus on near objects, eyeglasses for myopia are nothing more than a crutch. There are numerous self-help courses on the market for counteracting nearsightedness (they used to have a lot of radio advertisements), but the technique they use is not new at all. In fact it's very old, and it also happens to work. If you want to try it for yourself go get a book called "The Art of Seeing" written by none other than... Aldous Huxley??? Yes. He was nearly blind, and cured himself with these simple eye exercises. He then wrote this little book to explain how he did.

    It's called the Bates Method. 100% of eye physicians will tell you it's bunk, it's a hoax, and doesn't work. 100% of people who have tried it report success. Some of it is dramatic. They can't both be right, but if more people tried the Bates Method a lot of eyeglass-dispensing doctors would be out of work. In any event you could buy 10 of Huxley's books for the price of a single pair of eyeglasses. Try it. Here's the link:

    http://www.amazon.com/Art-Seeing-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0916870480

    Reading the reviews alone is worth the effort. Good luck!
     
  13. AK103K

    AK103K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    5,774
    Thanks for the link V35. :)
     
  14. LAK

    LAK Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,487
    What Just Jim said.

    I agree - people should stay away from sugar as far as possible - especially the refined variety. High fructose corn syrup is another slow poison to avoid. Yes, it is in about everything processed, bottled, canned, etc. I eat well, and still avoid it almost completely. Odd it seems that so many food products "just have to" contain this junk.

    I disagree with the idea that one should wear sunglasses all the time to "protect the eyes from harmful uv". If this was the case, half the the world would be blind by now - esp in the mid east, africa and asia etc where people spend an enormous amount of time outdoors in intense sun at all altitudes. My info suggests that your eyes need at the very least 20 minutes of sunlight a day, as does the body (skin), for the production of vitamin D. 45 minutes or so is better. If sunlight caused skin cancer all the primitive peoples of the world would be ridden with it.

    The only time it is really necessary to wear sunglasses is on snow and perhaps water where the reflected light can be both severe and damaging. A brimmed hat helps as well.

    Vitamin C is probably the single most important supplement you can take - unless you eat alot of fresh citrus fruit. I would take at least one 1000 mg timed release tablet morning mid, afternoon and night. Or one 250 to 500 mg capsule every two to three hours.
     
  15. Khornet

    Khornet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,861
    Location:
    NH
    Studies? Data?

    any of you supplement users and sugar-avoiders have any studies or data to back that up?

    Insulin levels rise with calorie ingestion. If you have insulin resistance, which is what type II diabetes is, and which is also present in obesity, you will tend to have abnormally high insulin levels because you have a disease.

    Absent a disease or a true nutritional deficiency, I'm not aware of any good studies showing that sugar is a toxin, or that any supplements improve eyesight or prevent its age-related decline.

    This is not to say that sensible eating habits, exercise, and all-around common sense are not a good idea.

    I speak as an internist and gastroenterologist, not an ophthalmologist. So if there are any real studies, not anecdotes or folk-medicine beliefs out there, that contradict me, I'll be glad to start taking supplements. My scores could use some improvement.
     
  16. LAK

    LAK Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,487
    No "studies" to hand; it is interesting that there are apparently no indepth longterm studies to investigate the effects of refined sugar. There is a pretty good timeline though in the growth of the sugar empire and sugar consumption - and the explosion of a plethora of conditions and unexplained "syndromes".

    On the subject of diabetes; whereas in my youth (the 60s through early 70s) I had never even heard of diabetes - let alone anyone who had it. Now, everyone I know has, knows someone who does, etc etc.

    As far as vitamin c is concerned, it is simply an essential part of our diet. Unlike cats for one, our body does not make it's own vitamin c. If you eat a primitive diet with plenty of naturally sourced C by all means you are probably fine. If not, the C supplement is a good idea.
     
  17. Kingcreek

    Kingcreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,790
    Location:
    at the center of my own little universe
    respectfully,
    re Bilberry:
    Principles and Practice of Phytotherapy, Mills and Bone, Churchill Livingstone 2000- lists 67 references for published articles/clinical trials from 1964-1996 (pages 300-302)
    Specific to visual disorders: bilberry extract (including isolated anthocyanins) improved vision in healthy subjects. visual perception improved in %76 of myopic patients (equiv 54mg anthocyanins plus retinol per day). 115mg equiv for 90 days improved darkness adaptation in all myopic patients and improved day vision in light-medium myopia.
    also evidence of beneficial effects of bilberry on peripheral edema, venous insufficiency, microcirculation disorders including retinopathy, reducing capilary fragility.
    Dr Khornet,
    I don't think the Merck Manual or Gray's would dispute my comments re effects of hyperglycemia/insulin but if you disagree with any part of my statements, point it out and I'll try to back it up. I don't want to be responsible for spreading any misinformation.
    I also recomend reading:
    Weston Price's exhaustive compilations, though not recent are excellent.
    Biochemical and Physiological Aspects of Human Nutrition, Stipanuk, Saunders co 2000
    The Crazy Makers: How the Food Industry is destroying our Brains and Harming Our Children, Simontacci and Tarcher, Putnam 2000 (alarmist title but good read)
    Dr Bernstein's Diabetes Solution: The Complete Guide to Achieving Normal Blood Sugars (rev ed) Little, Brown, and Co 2003
    Politics In Healing: The Suppression and Manipulation of American Medicine by Haley, Potomac Valley Press 2000.

    CAUTION
    Herbal therapies are much more complicated than most folks realize. Only 4 countries require herbal products be manufactured to pharmaceutical GMP standards and the US of A ain't one of them. (IMO, Australia currently leads the world herbal market in quality and practice standards.) There are some potential side effects and drug interactions with some herbs and I recommend all herbs be used under the guidance of a competent professional. The likelyhood of buying a quality herbal product off the shelf in the US is probably slim to none. You can go to the corner health food store and buy armloads of herbal product and nutritional supplements but most of it is expensive junk.
    I consider nutritional support and herbal (phyto)therapy as 2 distinct fields of study.
     
  18. Conqueror

    Conqueror Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    RTP, NC
    Use a supplement that contains the AREDS formula (things like PreserVision). It's the best medically-supported eye health supplement. I'm a med student and JUST finished the ophthalmology block, they mentioned this as a good formula for overall eye health several times.
     
  19. Atticus

    Atticus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,794
    Location:
    Ohio
    Primarily related to Age-Related Eye Disease Study...but supports a lot of anecdotal reports. Sugar I'm not sure about. Most of the studies I've seen on the subject generally indicate that "carbs are carbs".

    The Role of Nutrition in Eye Disease Prevention
    In October 2001, the NEI published the results of a seven-year study -- called the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) -- that showed that a high-dose combination of vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, and zinc significantly reduces the risk of developing advanced stages of AMD by about 25 percent. These high levels of antioxidants and zinc are the first effective treatment to slow the progression of AMD. The nutrients are not a cure for AMD, nor will they restore vision already lost from the disease. But they are playing a vital role in helping people at high risk for developing advanced AMD keep their vision. In the same study, the antioxidant and zinc combination showed no significant effect on the development or progression of cataract.

    Lutein was not part of this study because during the AREDS planning stages in the early 1990s, lutein and zeaxanthin were not commercially available.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1 Seddon, Johanna M., MD, et al, "Dietary Carotenoids, Vitamins A, C, and E, and Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration," JAMA, Vol. 272, No. 18, November 1994, pgs. 1413-1420.

    2 Chasen-Taber et al., "A Prospective Study of Carotenoid and Vitamin A Intakes and Risk of Cataract Extraction in US Women," American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1999, Vol. 70, pgs. 509-516.

    3 Brown et al., "A Prospective Study of Carotenoid Intake and Risk of Cataract Extraction in US Men," American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1999, Vol. 70, pgs. 517-524.

    4 Lyle et al., "Serum Carotenoids and Tocopherols and Incidence of Age-Related Nuclear Cataract," American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1999, Vol. 69, pgs. 272-277.

    5 Mares-Perlman et al., "Lutein and Zeaxanthin in the Diet and Serum and Their Relation to Age-Related Maculopathy in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey," American Journal of Epidemiology, 2001, Vol. 153, No. 5, pgs. 424-432.

    6 Mares-Perlman et al., "Association of Zinc and Antioxidant Nutrients With Age-Related Maculopathy," Archives of Ophthalmology, 1996, Vol. 114, No. 8, pgs. 991-997.

    7 VandenLangenberg et al., "Associations Between Antioxidant and Zinc Intake and the 50-Year Incidence of early Age-Related Maculopathy in the Beaver Dam Eye Study," American Journal of Epidemiology, 1998, Vol. 148, No. 2, pgs. 204-14.
     
  20. TEDDY

    TEDDY Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    884
    Location:
    MANNING SC
    eye supliments

    Dr Whitaker:Whitaker wellness institute=newport beach cal.
    health & healing forrester center wv 25438
    I used his vision essentials and did seem to help.however the VA offered to do cateract surgery and it worked fantastick.you might try contacting the wv group as he recomends their quality.:)---:)

    I am 83 and can see the front rear and target on pistol.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2008
  21. LAK

    LAK Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,487
    For what it's worth ....

    http://www.drmyhill.co.uk/article.cfm?id=319

    Chromium - a major player in the prevention of arteriosclerosis

    Chromium - a major player in the prevention of arteriosclerosis and a risk factor for diabetes. From Dr John Mansfield's paper on arteriosclerosis and heart disease.

    Since the early 1960s chromium has been recognised as being essential to human beings. Substantial geographic and racial variations have been found in chromium concentrations reflecting probable differences in chromium ingestion in various parts of the world and chromium appears to be absolutely necessary in the maintenance of human health. There is now an exceedingly well documented paper coming from the Biolab Medical Unit demonstrating a marked decrease of chromium levels both in the sweat, hair and serum with age.

    Chromium levels can be seen to be lower in males than females from about the age of 20 onwards and there is a marked decrease in chromium levels between the ages of 45 and 65 which correlates well with the increase in coronary artery disease during those years. This study was the result of a retrospective computer analysis of chromium levels in 51,665 samples of hair, sweat and serum from 40,872 patients according to age and sex. The numbers involved here are so enormous that very little doubt can be ascribed to these findings. [24]

    Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus have lower serum chromium than non-diabetics and chromium supplementation in diabetics has been shown to improve glucose tolerance, decrease blood cholesterol and triglycerides and increase high density lipoprotein cholesterol. [25]

    The aorta in patients dying of coronary artery disease has been shown in an Israeli study [26] to contain exceedingly little chromium, whereas the aorta of patients not dying in accidents has been shown to contain aortic chromium. Chromium supplementation has been shown to reverse arteriosclerosis in rabbits.

    To test whether increased chromium intake could improve glucose control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Richard Anderson (Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, M.D., USA) and colleagues in the USA and China studied 180 people with Type 2 Diabetes. Patients were assigned to three groups; a placebo group, a group where the normal diet was supplemented with 100 meg of chromium (as chromium picolinate) two times a day and a third group given 500 mcg of chromium - 2 x three times a day. All patients continued to take their normal medications. There was enormous improvement in all objective criteria in patients taking high dosage chromium, even by two months, and more markedly so by four months. [27]

    Natural sugars and grains do contain substantial concentrations of chromium sufficient to facilitate the metabolism of these high carbohydrate foods. However, almost all chromium is removed during the refining process leading to the production of most of the sugars which we eat, either in the form of sucrose or glucose. Evidence from human studies links deficient or marginal chromium intake with diets high in such processed carbohydrates.

    Such findings would correlate well with the observations that societies who increase their refined sugar intake have a very high incidence of coronary artery disease. While the amount of fat in the diet has not increased significantly over the past one hundred years, refined sucrose intake has increased by over a thousand percent and it is this factor which lead me, back in the 1960's, to feel very uncomfortable about the cholesterol theory.

    Thus, chromium depletion is demonstrably a major factor in the formation of high serum cholesterol levels. Chromium supplementation of a previously low chromium diet decreased rat serum cholesterol levels and in males restrained the tendency of cholesterol levels to increase with advancing age. Other studies showed that elevated age dependent serum cholesterol levels in rats consuming white purified sugar. In contrast, low cholesterol levels were found in rats ingesting brown sugar or white sugar with added chromium. All these findings and countless other ones of a similar nature suggest that serum cholesterol is not a fundamental cause of coronary artery disease, but a result of other factors such as chromium deficiency, which are themselves major factors in the engendering of this disease.

    AND ...

    Tissue levels of chromium tend to decrease with age, which may be a factor in the increase of adult-onset diabetes, a disease whose incidence has risen more than sixfold in the past 50 years. This increase may mirror the loss of chromium from our diets because of soil deficiency and the refinement of foods. Much of the chromium in whole grains and sugarcane is lost in making refined flour (40 percent loss) and white sugar (93 percent loss). In addition, there is some evidence that refined flour and sugar deplete even more chromium from the body. Reduced absorption related to aging, diets that are stressful to the digestive system, and the modern refined diet all contribute to chromium deficiency. Higher fat intake also may inhibit chromium absorption. If chromium is as important as we think it is to blood sugar metabolism, its deficiency may be in part responsible, along with the refined and processed diet, for the third leading cause of death (more than 300,000 yearly) in this country, diabetes mellitus, and this figure does not reflect other deaths that may be related to chromium deficiency, since high blood sugar levels seen in diabetes also increase the progression of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, our number one killer.

    http://www.bodyandfitness.com/Information/Weightloss/Research/chromium1.htm
     
  22. LAK

    LAK Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,487
    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 84, No. 5, 1171-1176, November 2006
    © 2006 American Society for Nutrition

    ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

    Consumption of sugar and sugar-sweetened foods and the risk of pancreatic cancer in a prospective study1,2,3
    Susanna C Larsson, Leif Bergkvist and Alicja Wolk
    1 From the Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (SCL and AW), and the Department of Surgery and the Centre for Clinical Research, Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden (LB)


    Background: Emerging evidence indicates that hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia may be implicated in the development of pancreatic cancer. Frequent consumption of sugar and high-sugar foods may increase the risk of pancreatic cancer by inducing frequent postprandial hyperglycemia, increasing insulin demand, and decreasing insulin sensitivity.

    Objective: The objective of the study was to examine prospectively the association of the consumption of added sugar (ie, sugar added to coffee, tea, cereals, etc) and of high-sugar foods with the risk of pancreatic cancer in a population-based cohort study of Swedish women and men.

    Design: A food-frequency questionnaire was completed in 1997 by 77 797 women and men aged 45–83 y who had no previous diagnosis of cancer or history of diabetes. The participants were followed through June 2005.

    Results: During a mean follow-up of 7.2 y, we identified 131 incident cases of pancreatic cancer. The consumption of added sugar, soft drinks, and sweetened fruit soups or stewed fruit was positively associated with the risk of pancreatic cancer. The multivariate hazard ratios for the highest compared with the lowest consumption categories were 1.69 (95% CI: 0.99, 2.89; P for trend = 0.06) for sugar, 1.93 (1.18, 3.14; P for trend = 0.02) for soft drinks, and 1.51 (0.97, 2.36; P for trend = 0.05) for sweetened fruit soups or stewed fruit.

    Conclusion: High consumption of sugar and high-sugar foods may be associated with a greater risk of pancreatic cancer.

    http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/84/5/1171
     
  23. Just Jim

    Just Jim Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,099
    I am not real big on medical studies because I don't trust the proffesion. Most are anti gun. However I remember when the proffesion kept telling us all that we eat too much salt causeing blood pressure problems. So Americans cut back on salt (sodium) and now we have problems with erectile dissfunction. The doctors come up with Viagra (a sodium dirivative) to help the problem.

    I really don't think they have fine tuned enough information to take the stands that they do in most cases. The numbers on diabetes speak for themselves.



    jj
     
  24. Kingcreek

    Kingcreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,790
    Location:
    at the center of my own little universe
    Off topic but true:
    Many of the studies are designed and funded by drug companies. Negative outcomes are less likely to be reported than positives.
    The Journal of the American Medical Association relaxed its standards on accepting papers from authors with financial interests in the outcomes.
    Conqueror,
    I am curious. How much, if any of the current medical education curriculum includes nutrition and/or herbal therapy?
    An effort to be ON topic:
    I think evidence and not just opinion has been presented for the OP in this thread.
     
  25. Conqueror

    Conqueror Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    RTP, NC
    ^^^Probably not enough. We do spend a bit of time in each block talking about relevant herbal therapies. The trouble is that many herbal therapies are unproven, and more often are interfering with proven medicines. I do think herbal remedies have a valuable place in medicine when properly studied and used. Unfortunately most people who use herbal remedies don't understand what's in them. For example, many people drink Valerian Root tea because they don't trust prescription sleeping pills. They don't have a clue that the main active ingredient in valerian root - desmethyldiazepam - is also the main metabolite of prescription benzodiazepines like Valium. So they're getting the same chemical, but in an uncontrolled, random dose from the tea, which can be dangerous.

    Uh, what? Viagra has nothing to do with sodium. I'm not even sure what "sodium derivative" means, since sodium is a bare element - you can't derive anything from a single atom. Anyway, sildenafil is a phosphodiesterase inhibitor that relaxes smooth muscle throughout the body. If anything it lowers blood pressure by dilating arteries - so it acts synergistically with a low-sodium diet, not against it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page