Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by MatthewVanitas, Jan 19, 2010.
How or when a payment or Commision for Services Rendered is formally construed to be a 'bribe' ( instead? of a traditional and universal recompense-fee-consideration ) , is sometimes less than clear.
For any branch of the US Gov't to cast asperions like this, is like a giant Caldren calling a Thimble 'Black'...
The FBI does not pay 'informants'? Outside Contractors? Deal-smoothers? Consultents?
One truly needs hip waders, if not a Wet Suit AND Scuba Gear, to swim in the BS stew of those gameboards I recon...
The real moral of the story?
Somebody forgot to grease the right lofty-enough guys in the operatively right way...
Sure it does. Of course the government wont see things that way, but there have been many wars throughout history fought, at least in part, for that very reason. It should also be noted that many (if not all) of those laws were written and passed by those in charge.
Oh, right. Suddenly Obama is powerful enough to telepathically induce grown adults to willingly break the law.
Get real. Believe it or not, every bad thing that happens in the world is not Obama's fault, as much as you want it to be.
If I want to be in Business, anywhere in the USA, I am obliged to pay ( and keep paying ) for protection against the violence of a mechanised state, in the form of a 'bribe', which then sees me handed a 'Business License', co-memorating on record, the bribe having been accepted.
If I wish to be employed, or to have an income, I must offer bribes to the IRS, for protection against their violence, and, to preserve for years, the paper co-memorations of the offers of bribes being accepted, according to their whim.
Like our government and also sanctioned contractors and businesses do not 'bribe' other country's leaders and other potentates in endless ways for favorable business, military, trade, and other co-operations and concessions?
And if they refuse to be bribed, the CIA (and or sub-contractors ) remove ( tacit, and or security related ) 'support'?
What is the definition of 'bribe' anyway? Where all other forms of remuneration/pay/kickbacks/financial incentive, up-front-admission-fees or other quid-pro-quo etc are distinctly different/deiferentiatable?
My problem with this is, as usual, the media's spin machine.
If these guys were arrested at a Mc Donalds would that be in the headline?
No, only the SHOT show makes it sensational.
"FBI arrests 21 during Happy Meal" doesn't sell newspapers.....
Pretty much anybody that works for any company that exports anything outside the US knows this. I don't even work in sales, but I have to take an annual export compliance course. US companies are bound by US law when doing business overseas. That means no bribes and no gift beyond a $50 value. The fines are huge, your company can be denied the ability to export and you can end up in jail.
In fairness, this is the biggest annual trade-show event in the firearms industry. The article specifically states that the FBI did their sweep during this since everyone was in the same place at the same time.
It's not exactly coincidence, and given the media's penchant for attention-grabbing it's hard to fault such a catchy tagline.
Sounds like a good reason to not have a US based company.
Mom, I didn't know you were on THR!
HighCom Security and US Cavalry respectively.
Business is business and a bribe is a bribe. Learn it.... love it... or go to jail.
IF Glock was found doing this to get US contracts over S&W the forums would be flush with lynch mobs looking for Gaston.
S&W does it and its "why not... that how the rest of the world does it?".
Yea... a lot of the rest of the world doesnt have human rights like we do. By your logic, why dont we just forefit some more of our human rights because thats how it is in other countries.
Im proud to live in a country that protects good business practices. If some of you dont like it.... plenty of other (more) corrupt countries for you to move to.
Absolutly dumbfounding :banghead:
Chances are the head sales guy is the one calling these shots. Of course, the CEO knows nothing about it..... Let's not forget that the money used for these bribes is often times very big bucks. An employee just doesn't go to the finance office and asks for thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of dollars for incidental expenses!
Unfortunately this is not the case. Facilitating payments and grease money are a cost of doing business overseas.
Pretty much any civilized country has similar laws. So unless you want your corporate office in Mogadishu, you will have similar restrictions.
Even countries that have a history of bribery still have laws against it. If you don't bribe the right people, they'll be used against you.
More likely it was an event the brought all or most of the persons to the same area at the same time. Large numbers of persons arrested at a time and place tend to give better pr in the feds opinion.
If we intend to keep any manufacturing base here at all we must reform the way we buy and sell to foreign countries and compete in those markets. If it means tariffs and incentives then so be it, if not we will fail to compete completely with Europeans that bribe and get unfair subsidies or Asians who use slave labor and substandard materials as well as bribes and companies being owned by the government.
I also agree with those who posted on the bribes thrown out to get votes in congress.
It's to bad these guys felt they had to do this to conduct business but in a world market it is believable. Substandard equipment is what concerns me more, that is a crime that should have the harshest concequence.
Separate names with a comma.