Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

FBI getting Social Security data

Discussion in 'Legal' started by onerifle, Jun 22, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. onerifle

    onerifle Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    176
    Location:
    Texas
    I guess that "optional" line for a SSN on a Form 4473 isn't going into a database somewhere, right? :rolleyes:


    FBI getting Social Security data
    By Eric Lichtblau The New York Times

    http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/06/22/news/social.php#

    WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22, 2005
    WASHINGTON The Social Security Administration has relaxed its privacy restrictions and turned over information on thousands of people to the FBI as part of terrorism investigations since the Sept. 11 attacks, newly disclosed records and interviews show.

    While the agency, whose main role is running the nationally financed retirement system, typically bans the disclosure of such sensitive information, officials began providing the information just days after the attacks to help the FBI get data on the hijackers, possible terrorists and even victims of the attack. The disclosures came in agency documents that were obtained by a private group through a freedom-of-information request and provided to The New York Times.

    Social Security officials, in policy memos beginning on Sept. 13, 2001, and updated through last year, authorized a policy allowing the FBI to gain access in some cases to the documents, including earnings and employer information.

    In the past, the agency had insisted on privacy standards that went beyond U.S. law, disclosing information to law enforcement officials only for someone who had been indicted. Under the eased rules, the agency also shared information in at least one other major investigation - the 2002 investigation of the sniper attacks in the Washington area, the documents show.

    "We ran thousands of Social Security numbers," said a former senior official at the FBI who spoke on condition of anonymity. "We got very useful information, that's for sure. We recognized the value of having that information to track leads and, to their credit, so did the Social Security Administration."

    But some privacy advocates and members of Congress, while sympathetic to the extraordinary demands posed by the Sept. 11 investigation, said they were troubled that the Social Security Administration abruptly shifted policy with no public discussion.

    "We in Congress were never told about this," said Representative Carolyn Maloney, Democrat of New York. She added, "This process has real civil liberties implications for abuse."
     
  2. rick_reno

    rick_reno member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,027
    It appears that implied power of Congress’s authority to investigate and oversee the executive branch and its agencies, such as the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice is literally "implied".
    They're not doing their job(s).
     
  3. ravinraven

    ravinraven Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    803
    Location:
    Brasher Falls NY
    If anyone ever had any question...

    ...about what is meant by the old guotation: "The road to hell is paved with good intenions," they need scratch their heads no more.

    rr
     
  4. odysseus

    odysseus Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    946
    Location:
    US Citizen
    Nothing to see here, move along!

    ...all is going according to plan.
     
  5. Zrex

    Zrex Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    572

    I haven't put my ss# on a 4473 on any of my recent purchases. As a matter of fact, the last time I would have possibly put it on a form was when I bought an SKS back in 1991.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page