Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Federal bill Sportsman's Act

Discussion in 'Activism Discussion and Planning' started by Ryanxia, Jul 9, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ryanxia

    Ryanxia Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4,298
    Location:
    'MURICA!
    So coming up we have a Senate bill that will be introduced called the Sportsman's Act which has to do with hunting it sounds like but both sides have plans for Pro gun and gun control amendments.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs.../new-gun-control-fight-brewing-in-the-senate/

    So obviously we want to let our reps know which amendments we support and which ones we don't, does anyone know how quickly the amendments get voted on? Do we wait and see what amendments are proposed and THEN contact our reps? That's what I'm thinking.
     
  2. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,566
    A snowball on the sidewalk today had a lot more chance than that bill does. Forget it.

    We need to support pro-gun candidates (not fake "sportsmen"), contribute to their campaigns, and contribute to effective pro-gun organizations. (Watch for fake "Sportsmen for XXX" groups that are designed to mislead us.)

    Support/oppose bills that have some chance of passage; wasting time and money on bills with zero chance or bills that are designed to be defeated for political reasons is not sensible.

    Jim
     
  3. barnbwt

    barnbwt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    6,797
    Granted, it is a remarkably cool year, so far.

    The facts as I've seen regarding this bill, are that the Republicans are testing the waters as far as pro-gun legislation, to see how much interest there is. We've demonstrated loudly that there is no practical interest whatsoever in increasing restrictions, but what about relaxing them? Given how long it's been since we dared dream of gun friendly legislation at the national level, how would the congress-critters know if we'd even support them in the endeavor? The closest thing to a pro-gun move we've seen recently --universal reciprocity-- was widely met with shades of suspicion and ambivalence (some of the former for good reason, at least until we see a real bill drafted) and the lawmakers promoting it went largely unthanked. Why bother loosening restrictions in DC? Those guys can't vote for federal reps that matter, and won't vote Republican, in any case :rolleyes:

    So, they send up a few trial balloons in a 'safe' non-controversial area like sport shooting to see if we'll fight half as hard for freedoms as we do against restrictions. Since the Dems own the Senate, of course they'll seek to add amendments of their own, while they can. But the fact that they'd be putting efforts at gun-restriction in a gun-centric piece of legislation should drive home the fact that they know they won't be pulling a fast one over on us this time.

    BTW; what the hell, WaPo? "Bipartisan legislation?" You mean Manchin-Toomey? Really? The legislation so 'bipartisan' it couldn't even make it past the first vote and will probably cost Begich his seat? Four republicans apart from the supposed 'author' do not a bipartisan measure make :rolleyes:

    Unlike the anti's, our side doesn't ever seem to even propose legislation, Hail Mary longshots or otherwise. I honestly have no clue what the NRA or any other advocacy group's goals are once they get the ear of the senate again. Do we have a plan, or is our opposition purely defensive?

    TCB
     
  4. rockhopper46038

    rockhopper46038 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2013
    Messages:
    302
    What I have done is called my two Senators and informed them that unless the Amendments proposed by Cruz, Rand, Lee, et. al. are heard, (which is what Reid wants to stop) then I expect them to vote AGAINST cloture.
     
  5. Ryanxia

    Ryanxia Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4,298
    Location:
    'MURICA!
    Interesting.

    I hope these amendments materialize into something we can get behind (or stand in front of). We've done an excellent job of stopping further gun control on the federal level, it would be great to get over that tipping point and actually start to see some pro Gun legislation banging on the door.
     
  6. Outlaw Man

    Outlaw Man Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,870
    Location:
    Cleaning my guns.
    GOA has been hammering this bill, despite its support from the NSSF. From my understanding it has the potential to benefit hunting, but most of the provisions are toothless and just pandering for votes for Democrat Senators up for election.

    I've heard of potential pro-gun amendments from national concealed carry reciprocity to ending Operation Choke Point. Any of these will certainly kill the bill, which is, I believe, the desire of Paul, Cruz, etc. If they can force them to vote on legitimate pro-gun legislation they'll have to either support it or expose themselves for the anti-gunners they are.
     
  7. oneounceload

    oneounceload member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,710
    Location:
    Hot and Humid FL
    But THIS little bit in the bill merits a LOT of support:

     
  8. JERRY

    JERRY Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Messages:
    2,349
    Jim K is right. if you want meaningful laws which protect our rights, you need to start electing meaningful people.
     
  9. alsaqr

    alsaqr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,276
    Location:
    South Western, OK
  10. AlexanderA

    AlexanderA Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,859
    Location:
    Virginia
    barnbwt wrote:

    The last time the NRA seriously went on the offensive was with FOPA, and that ended up giving us the Hughes Amendment. What did we get that was positive? An unenforcable "safe harbor" for interstate travel with guns, and the ability to buy long guns over the counter in gun shops across the country (not just in home state/contiguous state). That is, if you can get the out-of-state gun shop to sell you one. In return, we got shafted with the MG freeze that has made MG's all but unaffordable. Big time net loss for gun owners (IMO).

    I would be very leery of the NRA "going on the offensive." The general culture at the NRA is a defensive one (but above all the culture at the NRA is all about raising money for themselves). I say this with sadness, because it's the best lobbying organization we have.
     
  11. MErl

    MErl Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,283
    FOPA also got rid of ammunition tracking and put the registry prohibition into law.

    It also seems that the rules for amendments have changed since 86.
    If the poison pills don't even get speaking time they cannot get into the bill.
     
  12. Deltaboy

    Deltaboy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Messages:
    6,262
    Location:
    Texas
    Good to see this bill DIE.
     
  13. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,243
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    The Hughs amendment was the ONLY downside to Volker-McClure. Are you cognizant of the abuses people suffered at the myriad tentacle ends of a rogue ATF from '68-'85?
     
  14. barnbwt

    barnbwt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    6,797
    Or today?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page