whatnickname
Member
Back in the day the Colt Vs. Smith & Wesson argument kept the hot stove league in constant debate. “The Colt was a 41 caliber frame and therefore stronger and able to accommodate 38 Special high-speed loads.” “Colts never got out of time.” These were two of the arguments I heard when I was in grade school.
“The Smith & Wesson had a faster lock time and was much less complicated than the Colt.“ and on and on…
Smith & Wesson was more prolific than Colt and has withstood the test of time perhaps better. Both Colt and Smith
were and are excellent revolvers today. It’s harder to come buy vintage Colts this age in good mechanical condition. Both of mine have holster wear…the Official Police more so than the Army Special. Both have shiny bores, perfect timing and tight lock-up. Don’t have any idea who the original owners were, but it’s clear these two revolvers were well cared for. As far as I’m concerned, the holster wear gives them character. Wish they could talk!
“The Smith & Wesson had a faster lock time and was much less complicated than the Colt.“ and on and on…
Smith & Wesson was more prolific than Colt and has withstood the test of time perhaps better. Both Colt and Smith



