Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Fin stabilized smooth bore sabot slug?

Discussion in 'Shotguns' started by Blakenzy, Nov 10, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Blakenzy

    Blakenzy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    Messages:
    904
    I saw one in a catalog a looong time ago. It looked like a ribbed dart in a sabot, minus the sharp tip. I think the brand was Sauvestre or something like that, but I have never seen one in real life, nor any where else. I guess the idea of fin stabilized projectiles fired from smooth bores works well enough that it is used in main battle tanks. Why isn't it more popular with shotguns?
     
  2. highorder

    highorder Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,349
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Because fin stabilized projectiles dont have the mass that a sabot or rifled slug does. Mass conveys energy to the target. Finned projectiles are meant as high velocity penetrators.

    Slugs are for killing animals, not penetrating armor.
     
  3. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    I think mainly because:

    (a) in order for a gas seal to form, the fins must be folded or retracted in some manner while going down the bore - such a design is EXPENSIVE to produce, and
    (b) Most people that use shotguns for game hunting do so ONLY because their states are "shotgun-only" big game hunting states - well, since most if not all of these states DO allow a "rifled shotgun" to be used (which is not really a shotgun at all, but that's for a different thread), there's no NEED to stabilize it with any other method other than rifling.

    As for why do .mils use smooth/fin-stabilized in ordnance delivery, IIRC I believe it's in order to gain a higher velocity (the rifling slows things down a bit), but for non-mil uses, there's no need for that kind of extra velocity, espec. in light of the expense noted above.

    Then there's that, too.
     
  4. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    Sabot tank rounds only weigh a fraction of what a standard main gun projectile would weigh.

    That allows extremely high velocity of over 5,500 FPS to be achieved at allowable pressure levels.
    The high velocity is needed to penetrate armor.

    Something you don't need or want in a shotgun used for hunting or SD.

    rc
     
  5. Blakenzy

    Blakenzy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    Messages:
    904
    Wouldn't it offer a significant improvement accuracywise for smooth bore owners?

    Well, I can't find anything on www.sauvestre.com. they only have rifle rounds. Either they don't make it anymore or I have the name wrong.
     
  6. highorder

    highorder Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,349
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Smooth bore shotguns do just fine for people that hunt with them. Rifled slugs are accurate enough for the range they are intended for.

    There's no need, therefore no market for finned projectiles considering the quality stuff available for rifled shotgun barrels. As the good Dr. said, anywhere you are limited to a shotgun for deer, rifled barrels are permitted.

    As RC said, even with improved accuracy, you would sacrifice killing power with a much lighter finned projectile.
     
  7. bigalexe

    bigalexe Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    931
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    I think the difference between a tank gun and a shotgun slug is that with the tank gun if you miss by half a meter it really doesn't matter much because the projectile is still going to explode and at least maim if not kill the intended target. Tank guns have accuracy measured in meters for this reason. A shotgun slug that misses its target by 8 inches will not explode (with few exceptions called bird bombs, but that's another topic entirely) and still have the same effect. When we hunt we intend to kill the target completely so a near-miss is unacceptable.
     
  8. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    I don't think there would be any accuracy improvement.

    Forster & Brenneke slugs are inherently stable from the get-go because they are heavy on the front and light on the back like a badminton shuttlecock.

    A Sabot gets destabilized to some extent when the sabot seperates.
    Then it has to regain stability as it flys to the target and the fins kick in.

    When you are talking 20 - 75 yards with a shotgun slug, starting out stable like a shotgun slug has a lot to say for it.

    BTW: Sabot anti-tank / tank main gun rounds do not explode.
    They are just an inert rod, and drill through enemy armor because they are going faster then a speeding bullet!

    rc
     
  9. Fred Fuller

    Fred Fuller Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    Messages:
    21,221
    Location:
    AL, NC
    http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m1.htm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M829

    Kinda hard to compare... 120mm vs 12 bore, 5,550 FPS vs. 1600 FPS, thermal sights vs two each Mark 1 eyeballs, computerized gun stabilization system vs. brain, nerves and muscles, etc.

    Ever seen an M1A1 doing live fire on the run? Spookiest thing I ever saw, watching that muzzle track as the tank changed inclination and direction.

    lpl
     
  10. Beagle-zebub

    Beagle-zebub Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    Mmmmmm, I don't think that's entirely right. This FAS article says that "DU is a natural pyrophoric material," and that's what those rods are made of. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/pgu-14.htm

    This Global Security article says it is also "self-sharpening." http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/du.htm

    Nasty stuff, that! :evil:
     
  11. Shawn Dodson

    Shawn Dodson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,308
    I tested the Sauvestre fin stabilized slug about 8-9 years ago using a Remington 870P. I still have a few left.

    Out of my 870 it was less accurate than a standard foster slug. (My 870 was fitted with a Vang Comp barrel which could have affected accuracy.)

    Basically it turned my 12 gauge into a .45-70 Gov't. That's about it.

    It had no problem penetrating two pieces of 20 gauge sheet metal set at an angle (simulating a car door), with little deflection.

    I tried measuring velocity but one of the sabot halves struck my Oehler 35 skyscreen, damaging two of them.

    Intriguing concept.

    I also shot 105mm and 120mm sabot projectiles when I was an M1 Abrams tank commander, but I digress.
     
  12. bigalexe

    bigalexe Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    931
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    Ok I always assumed tank rounds went boom but I guess that's not correct. I do know interestingly that the British Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank uses a rifled 120mm cannon designated the L30A1 which is the only one in NATO.

    Thanks for the lesson anyway.
     
  13. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
  14. Blakenzy

    Blakenzy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    Messages:
    904
  15. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    So, lead slug and gold plastic fins.

    Same heavy front end - light rear end as the other slugs & stabilized like a badminton shuttlecock.

    rc
     
  16. Shawn Dodson

    Shawn Dodson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,308
    Yup, that's what I tested.
     
  17. RandKL

    RandKL member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    602
    *cough* oblique fins *cough* spin stabilized *cough*

    ;)

    r
     
  18. desidog

    desidog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Messages:
    2,317
    I'm surprised that DRT doesn't have an edition of this load....
     
  19. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    Cough all you want to, but the "oblique fins" on a rifled slug do little or nothing to impart spin to the slug.

    The super-sonic shock-wave over the nose of the slug leaves them operating in what amounts to an air burble.
    There is no laminer air flow over the "rifling" fins to make them do anything much at all.

    They are well past 50 yards before they go sub-sonic and even begin to get a little laminar flow over the fins.

    The fins are there to give excess lead a place to go when the slug hits a choke and has to squeeze down to get through it. Nothing more.

    rc
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2009
  20. RandKL

    RandKL member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    602
    Wow, I've really been taught a lesson there....and it has nothing to do with the entire topic. Then again, I already knew about rifled slugs, too, so maybe I wasn't.

    The fins on the FINNED slug in question, RCM, have pretty danged obvious oblique leading and trailing edges that DO impart spin to the FINNED slug in question.

    r
     
  21. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    I still contend that there is no laminar air flow over the fins on a super-sonic slug with rifling or fins. The shockwave coming off the nose of the slug leaves a semi-vacuum in its wake until it goes sub-sonic at extended range.

    The finned slug may have an airfoil shape, but without laminar air flow over them, they are stalled out, and provide no spin.

    rc
     
  22. highorder

    highorder Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,349
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    I agree with RC here. Not to mention the moment of inertia provided by the heavy projectile that needs to be overcome by the stubby fins in the slipstream.

    The rudder on the Titanic was capable of making turns, but not to the extent necessary. :)
     
  23. RandKL

    RandKL member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    602
    Contend all you want, RC. The makers of said FIN STABILIZED slug said it does. Who do I believe?

    They also advertised that said FIN STABILIZED slug as making 12" groups at 200 yards. Something quite a few users at the time agreed with. In your experience with fin stabilized slugs, do the fins ever stabilize the fin stablized slug inside that range?

    Me, I'd guess that since Foster slugs aren't that accurate at 200 yards, the oblique fins are doing a pretty good job of it.

    r
     
  24. Remo-99

    Remo-99 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    673
    Location:
    S32-E152 Hunter Valley
    U-238/DU penetrators were originally employed for their mass density ratio and lower cost than a tungsten equivelant, the 'pyro' effect was a bonus side-effect.
    After penetrating thick bunker walls, the material generates massive heat from friction and will incinerate targets within a certain angle/radius/proximity.
    No explosives, just plain old positive temp coeffient of fraction + velocity.
     
  25. Shawn Dodson

    Shawn Dodson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,308
    Oblique leading and trailing edges? No. Each fin is tapered on both sides to make them aerodynamic. Their purpose is to facilitate drag stabilization.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page