Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Fired my new Enfield #4 Mk1 today

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Devonai, May 23, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Devonai

    Devonai Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,827
    Location:
    Connecticut
    So I finally took my recently purchased #4 to the range this morning. The free range I use is limited to 35 yards, but this was fine since I wanted to see how the rifle was grouping.

    Firing from the prone resulted in a 3" group about 10" low and 5" right. I was able to bring the windage over a couple of inches simply by being more careful with my trigger pull, but the elevation correction had to be done manually. Aiming at point approximately 10" above the target resulted in a good group.

    When I bought the rifle, there was an almost identical #4 sitting right next to it. It was ten dollars less and I pored over the two rifles, trying to figure out the price difference. Finally I decided on the more expensive one ($199). However, I thought that I'd purchased the rifle with a 0.30 front sight blade. Today I realized that my rifle actually has a 0.60 front sight blade. Time to hit the books and find out which sight to use.

    I also discovered that my rifle doesn't like Remington UMC brand .303 for some reason. The bold either won't strip the round from the magazine or it will slip, jamming the round and damaging the case. Sellier & Bellot, however, resulted in no functions problems whatsoever.
     
  2. Lone Star

    Lone Star Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,744
    Location:
    SW USA
    Remington .303 ammo that I've seen has a roundnose bullet. Sptizer (pointed) bullets approximating the shape of Mk. VII British ball ammo often feeds better. Try Winchester, Federal, or Norma ammo.

    Lone Star
     
  3. jem375

    jem375 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,508
    Location:
    Minnesota
    It should shoot better than 3" at that distance......try the Federal 150 gr. SP's.......mine shoots the 150 gr. ammo much better than the 174 gr............
     
  4. Fatelvis

    Fatelvis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,848
    Location:
    Lockport, IL
    Both of mine shoot Lymans 314299 cast bullet, better than any jacketed bullet. (a little slower though)
     
  5. RON in PA

    RON in PA Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,032
    Location:
    S.E. PA, USA
    Unless your #4 is a total wornout rifle it should shoot under 4" groups at 100 yards and under 1.5" at 35. If the gun shoots low can't you raise the rear sight or does it have the simple L-shaped flip sight?
     
  6. Andrew Wyatt

    Andrew Wyatt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,468
    Location:
    Bakersfield, California
    he needs to zero it using the front sight. moving the rear means he's zeroed for that distance only and then the sight graduations don't work.



    I use PMC .303 exclusively. i'd zero your gun with the 174 grain fodder it was designed for and then see where it shoots with the 150s.
     
  7. Devonai

    Devonai Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,827
    Location:
    Connecticut
    I have the older-style fully adjustable micrometer rear sight. Today I was using the large aperature. I was firing from the unsupported prone. If I'd supported the rifle with my ruck or something I'd expect better groupings.
     
  8. Oleg Volk

    Oleg Volk Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    9,155
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    UMC ball ammo doesn't confirm to the standard 303 dimensions, AFAIK...won't work in clips at all.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page