Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

First .22 - Mark III or Single six?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by TwoNiner, Mar 1, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TwoNiner

    TwoNiner Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    172
    I am looking to pick up my first .22 hand gun. My humble yet growing collection at present far consists of an GP100, SP101, and next week a Redhawk .44 will be added to the family.

    Right now I have my eyes set on the Ruger Mark III Hunter edition with the 6.88in barrel, cocobolo wood grips and fiber optic front sight. Then again, the Ruger stainless 6.5in single six convertible with rosewood grips also caught my eye.

    These two ladies are certainly about as different as possible from one another. One being a modern auto loader with all the safety features (mag disconnect, internal lock, and external safety), and the other, a simplistic, no frills single action cowboy gun. The single sixes' candor, and nostalgic demeanor of the wild west is attractive, but at times over-shadowed to the high capacity and rapid-plinking capability that the Mark III offers.

    Both .22s are easy on the eyes and balanced in the hand. The grip on the Mark III is a bit small for my large hands, so I may get some custom grips made for it should I choose that route.

    I would also point out I haven't shot either gun to date. Which route would you choose for your first .22?
     
  2. aHFo3

    aHFo3 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Messages:
    549
    Location:
    Redmond, OR
    Who are you kidding, you will own both at some point, so the question is which do you want first.

    Get the autoloader. For me it is all about the ease of loading/unloading. The single six is a bit cumbersome loading and unloading one at a time.

    Both are accurate and reliable, I chose the MKII for my first .22 handgun, but the III was a decade away.
     
  3. Gunfighter123

    Gunfighter123 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,473
    Location:
    IL/WIS State Line
    WOW --- a hard choice !!!! I own both of the .22s you ask about. I find I shoot my 5 1/2" Ruger bull barrel more BUT I've normally shot more centerfire 1911s in the past. I like the fact that I can have extra mags and practice mag changes and the grip angle is very close to a 1911 in my hands.

    For the past 4-5 years , I've been shooting TONS of SASS/cowboy action competitions and therefor have used a pair of Ruger Bisley single sixs for practice. The fact that if you have the spare cylinder , you can also shoot the more powerfull .22mag is a plus.

    Both the Rugers you asked about are way more accurate then most shooters -- so thats a draw !!!

    Given you have two Double Action revolvers ---- I'd suggest you think about a D.A. .22rf revolver ---- I have both S&W and Rossi revolvers in .22rf DA and they are a real plus for learning to shoot my centerfire double action revolvers accurately and rapidly.

    IF I could only pick one of the Rugers you asked about --- I guess it would be the Mk II or MK III semi-auto.
     
  4. Four Knives

    Four Knives Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    103
    Hunter Model Ruger MK III is tough to beat.

    I have both (albeit a blued version of single six convertible 22/22m), and the MK III IMO is a better all around plinker - and comes along more often than the single six.

    The slow loading of the single six will save you pennies on 22 ammo, but gets a bit cumbersome over time.


    ** eta
    Funny that I was drafting at the same time as the posts above adn that AH and I both used the word cumbersome.

    Addtnly, since the single six barrel is sized to accomodate the sliiiightly larger 22 mag round, there are many reports of accuracy falloff when using 22lr - granted, it's minor, but I find the MK III Hunter more accurate.
     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2010
  5. AStone

    AStone Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    24,176
    Location:
    Far N, E coast
    Interesting to find this thread.

    I've been pondering the same question.

    Reading with interest.

    Nem
     
  6. Old Shooter

    Old Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,041
    Location:
    Virginia
    You already have 3 revolvers so mayby it's time to try the autoloader side of the fence. I've had all three "marks" of the Ruger auto and all have been gret guns for plinking and target shooting. My current model is a Mark III 22/45 in blue and it's a great gun. And as has been said already, you will get the other one sometime anyway.
     
  7. pikid89

    pikid89 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,556
    Location:
    The Gator Nation
    get the autoloader, but make it a mark II, because of the reasons you mentioned,
    ...that stuff is useless
     
  8. BCRider

    BCRider Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,782
    Location:
    Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
    For larger hands do check out the Ruger 22/45. The balance at first feels a touch odd due to the lighter weight of the plastic frame but the classic 1911 sized and angled grip should fit a larger hand a little better.

    If you like the grip but not the balance then look at the Browning Buckmark. Metal frame means a less top heavy feel and the grip shape fits a larger hand nicely.

    While I don't mind loading .38's into a single action .22 just begs to be shot a bit faster. With that in mind I want a swing out hand ejector cylinder or something like the the old 9shot Harrington and Richardson top break .22 I got a few months back. But the star of my .22 revolver clan is the S&W Model 17-3 that I just got earlier this week. What a sweetheart to shoot! It's "only" six shots but with the swing out cylinder clearing and loading goes fast. I can hold and load two cartridges at a time with it. The 17 or the younger brother K-22 don't show up all that often and when they do they aren't cheap. But there's a very good reason for that. The owners don't want to sell them once they have one.

    Anyway as others are saying this won't be your last .22. It's just a question of which itch is bothering you the most... :D
     
  9. AStone

    AStone Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    24,176
    Location:
    Far N, E coast
    Browning Buckmark. One of 25.

    I researched those a few years ago along with the 22/45.

    Which one is so hard to field strip/clean?
     
  10. CajunBass

    CajunBass Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    5,690
    Location:
    North Chesterfield, Virginia
    I alwsy get a kick out of it when someone says a single action is slow to load and unload. So what? You in a big hurry to shoot up your ammo?

    Having said that, I'd say it's six of one, and a half dozen of the other. They're both good guns.. Just get the one you happen to like best at that moment. As others have said you'll end up with the other soon enoungh.
     
  11. ClemY

    ClemY Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    490
    Location:
    Maryland
    If you already have a GP100, SP101 and are picking up a Redhawk, perhaps you might want to consider a double action .22 to use as a subcaliber practice tool. I have a MK III Hunter and a 6 ½” Single Six, but I actually shoot my S&W 617 a lot more than either because it is a subcaliber substitute for my bigger double action revolvers. I can spend most of my time practicing double action shooting with a .22 before I start banging off more expensive ammo in a 627 or 625.
     
  12. BullRunBear

    BullRunBear Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,080
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    I'm a revolver guy, especially single actions. I like the history/nostalgia and prefer the slower, deliberate pace. Target shooting is relaxing for me and rushing through my ammo is not part of the picture.

    Having said that, I suggest getting the Mk III. I have a Mk II competition model with the bull barrel and it is more accurate than my Single-Sixes. I, too, have large hands and find the grip comfortable but everyone is different in their preferences. The Ruger automatics are a pain to take down for cleaning but I only do that once or twice a year. The rest of the time I just swab the barrel and make sure the feed ramp is clean. And being machanically challenged :rolleyes: If I can reassemble a MK II, anyone can.

    As almost everyone has said, you'll end up with both eventually. And keep an eye open for a deal on a K-22 or Model 17. They are superb. If I had to get rid of all but one of my 22s, :what: my K-22 is the one I would keep.

    Jeff
     
  13. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,450
    Location:
    TN
    I would choose the Mark III Hunter model. No question. I have nothing against single actions, but I find 22 rimfire single actions a bit slow to load and unload for my tastes. Most of it's likely use is plinking. That said, I think the larger caliber single actions are very good guns and the speed is less important. Cost of ammo comes into play as well as the size of the cartridges for the centerfire single actions.

    I would generally suggest you get the Mark III with the 5.5" bull barrel however as it is a bit easier to carry around. I carry my Mark II in a holster for woods use. I have looked at the Hunter Model and I like it. Go for it if the barrel length works for you.
     
  14. bflobill_69

    bflobill_69 Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    305
    Location:
    Northcentral, AZ
    Ruger's .22 rimfires are a tremendous value... and both the guns you mention are single action, so the question is, do you plan to shoot more semi-auto's in the future or revolvers?
     
  15. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    I am a revolver guy.

    But I have 2 22/45s and a Mark II Target. They're just that good, that affordable, and that much fun to shoot.

    .22 single actions, particularly Rugers with no inherent latching of the cylinder in line with the ejector rod, are a PITA.

    I someday want a Single Six to go with my Blackhawk, Super Blackhawk, and other single actions, but it hasn't been a top priority for me, obviously, since I have yet to get one.:)
     
  16. RonBernert

    RonBernert Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    183
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    I have both. You will eventually have both. It's just the way these things go!!

    It works this way: You own the 22/45. Someone asks you the exact question you are asking. You say "Here- borrow mine, JUST DON'T TAKE IT APART!! shoot 500 rounds thru it and make up your own mind!"
    Meanwhile, you miss the 22/45. You buy a Single Six to shoot for the 3 days your 22/45 is missing.. Don't think this will happen? Don't think you'd lend it out? Everyone here who knows these two guns will tell you that they're like dealing crack- Lend them out for free, and next thing you know, they buy one. Every time. Like death and taxes.. Ruger .22's....

    You'll own both..

    We're lauging at you, not with you.... We know what's going to happen!!:neener::neener::neener::neener:;)
     
  17. RonBernert

    RonBernert Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    183
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Oh- and in the time it takes you to re-load your magazines, I'm popping thru the .22's with the Single Six.. You'll own both.....
     
  18. Quoheleth

    Quoheleth Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,191
    Location:
    The Land of Bowie, Crockett, Travis & Houston
    Well, you seem to be a revolver guy. I would say start with the Single six. Add the MkIII later. Make sure you get the convertable with the Mag cylinder. You probably won't use it much, but if you want to give a new shooter a nice load between .22 and .38 Special, the Magnum is a nice step in that direction.

    Q
     
  19. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    LOL

    Yeah, sure. Like I said, I'm a revolver guy, and I tend to like single actions, too. But I shot NRA Sectionals last Saturday with a Mark II, and I assure you, reloading the Mark II from loose rounds can happen a hell of a lot faster than a Single Six.

    BTW why doesn't Ruger put their reverse-indexing pawl on the Single Six and the whole Blackhawk family? They'd sell me at least two new guns, really soon, if they did. Otherwise, I'd just as soon buy used and avoid the !@#$ lock they're sneaking in there now, as well as the throwaway plastic grips they put on the blue guns.

    I did buy another 22/45 from a guy in a parking lot a few weeks ago...
     
  20. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    14,630
    I remember facing this same question over 20 years ago. I found a limited edition Bisley which had a blued frame but with a stainless grip assembly. And just to make the decision more difficult, the same dealer had a Mk.II 5.5" bull barrel, built the same way; blued upper assembly with a stainless grip frame. Both were the same price too. The Bisley looked nice, but the slower reloading time tipped the scales in favor of the Mk.II in the end.
     
  21. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,317
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    Much as I love revolvers, get the auto first. Awesome accurate gun and along with the Buckmark, sets the standard for .22 plinker class guns. I'd look around for the slightly simpler Mk 2 used, though. They can be had for real reasonable. Mine's a Mk 2.
     
  22. Confederate

    Confederate Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,198
    Location:
    Arlington, VA
    Gun prices are soaring. Get one or both.

    I personally think you'll regret buying a handgun with a long barrel. It's tough to pick up on a moving target and the weight causes fatigue. I wholeheartedly recommend the 5-inch bull barrel and even the 6 7/8-inch tapered barrel and the one you want, but I like the shorter tubes. If you want a barrel that's longer, get a rifle.

    I have a Single-Six and love it. You'll never regret getting either...or both.

    Rugers_MkII_SS_3-1.gif
     
  23. RatDrall

    RatDrall Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    796
    The Mark III is much lighter and more compact. I have one that I use for a pack gun when out and about. I don't really like the slow firing speed of the Single Six, you never know when you might need a fast followup shot (or 9).

    I am constantly amazed at how easy it is to shoot the Mark III at full speed, there is so little recoil and the 6-7/8" barrel balances so well. I'm also amazed at the accuracy potential. The other day I shot mine and at 25 yards I was able to shoot out the bar code on the badguy targets I was shooting with my centerfire handguns.
     
  24. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,450
    Location:
    TN
    If your question or decision was between a Smith Model 17 or 18 (4 or 6" 617) and the Ruger, I would be hard pressed to choose the Ruger even though I love shooting my Ruger Mark II. I just like good double action revolvers better.

    I don't own a Single Six but I have shot them. The loading is okay if you can handle the little 22 cartridges; it is the unloading that bothers me in terms of speed.
     
  25. wanderinwalker

    wanderinwalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,027
    Location:
    SW NH
    I have a 22/45 Mk III, a Single Six and a S&W M-18 (4" K-frame .22LR). Of the three, I "THINK" the 22/45 is the most accurate, but the Smith is good too. The Single-Six is noticeably harder to shoot as accurately.

    Get the auto first, keep your eyes open for a K-frame .22 and pick up a used Single Six sometime. It's the only logical thing to to!

    Of course, my used S&W cost almost as much as both Rugers did new, but it's a different beast. It is NOT for sale, and I have been asked! ;)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page