Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Flawed numbers in Colorado gun law

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Huskerguy, Jul 25, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Huskerguy

    Huskerguy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    188
    Location:
    Central Kansas
    Not sure if this has been posted here or not. The state of Colorado made some bold estimates that are not even close to reality and it is costing tax payers a bunch of coin. Of course, there is the usual spin. I don't understand why people can't just say if something works or doesn't work and be honest about it.

    http://news.yahoo.com/apnewsbreak-gun-law-based-flawed-estimate-070030733.html
     
  2. gunnutery

    gunnutery Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,682
    Location:
    Iowa
    Yes, the usual spin. Those that passed the law and allocated the money can claim it's working while those that oppose the law will claim the law was too hasty and ambitious based on flawed info.

    Meanwhile thugs haven't changed their habits or stealing/buying practices since they didn't care about the law before or after it changed.
     
  3. MErl

    MErl Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,283
    My experience with a local board says private sales are way down. Guns sit for sale, especially lower priced ones like cheap shotguns and .22LR. A deal is much less of a deal when you have to add in $20+ in fees and a couple hours of your time.

    There have been a couple reports in the Denver paper about the number of BG checks and the number denied. The counts are low to the point of the # denied after appeal was in double digits for last year (sorry I cannot find that source it has been a few months). Those that know they are not going to pass a BG check will not try to pass one and will find other sources. Nobody can think a black market does not exist. This is catching the people with unpaid parking tickets and the like. (I have not seen a breakdown on why people were denied, only CBI has that data and it is not released. That last statement on who is being caught is my opinion)

    A more cynical way to look at it is the laws are working; sales are down. If you look at the laws as an attack on legal gun ownership and not as a safety measure they make more sense. The unenforceable magazine law means you cannot buy them in state or mail order, even if you'll never get caught for violating it. The fee to pay for CBI means that even with the BG checks being a complete waste of time and money the gun owners are paying for it so lawmakers can just laugh. The mandatory BG check cannot be enforced either but nobody is willing to trust a stranger so it gets honored. The laws are working in their true intent, just not in the theme of public safety.
     
  4. longknife12

    longknife12 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2010
    Messages:
    551
    Location:
    colorado
    That's what we tried to tell them. The general arrogant mind set of the lib legislature was totally beyond belief! They would listen to nothing that wasn't on their agenda.
    Dan
    :mad:
     
  5. X-Rap

    X-Rap Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,651
    The skewing of numbers regarding gun laws is no different than the way they are doing the numbers on the pot laws.
    They either ignore or refute data counter to their agenda or repeat the lies supporting it until it becomes the truth in media and social interactions.
     
  6. Rio Laxas

    Rio Laxas Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    874
    Location:
    Texas
    I was recently at a Denver gun store with someone doing a background check for a handgun. I was appalled at how long it took. It was at least 20 minutes, if not more. It was significantly longer than the longest NICS check I've seen (which ended in a delay).
     
  7. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,680
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    One of the worst problems with our system is that there are virtually NO metrics associated with a new law, and no review process to determine its effectiveness.

    A law should state up front what it is intended to accomplish, how that accomplishment will be measured, and should automatically expire in a reasonable time. Supporters of the law should be required to show it accomplished it's goals when trying to extend it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page