Freeh: Clinton undermined Saudi bombing probe

Status
Not open for further replies.

rick_reno

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,027
Clinton sure was a turd.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/10/freeh.clinton/index.html

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former FBI Director Louis Freeh on Sunday accused former President Bill Clinton of ditching the investigation into the 1996 bombing of a U.S. barracks in Saudi Arabia to pursue better relations with Iran.

In an interview with CBS' "60 Minutes," Freeh said Clinton failed to seek Saudi cooperation with the investigation into the Khobar Towers attack, which killed 19 U.S. airmen. He said Clinton instead pressed then-Crown Prince Abdullah, now king, for a donation to his presidential library -- a charge the former president's spokesman and a former adviser told CBS was false.

"I was very disappointed that the political leadership in the United States would tell the families of these 19 heroes that we were going to leave no stone unturned and find the people who killed them, to give that order to the director -- because that's the order that I got -- and then do nothing to assist and facilitate that investigation, and, in fact, to undermine it," Freeh said.

Representatives of the former president did not return CNN calls seeking comment. But former Clinton spokesman Joe Lockhart said Freeh's accusation has been disputed by "everyone who was in those meetings."

"All he is trying to do is follow the right-wing playbook, which is to make up a bunch of charges about President Clinton and do it in a way that you can line your own pockets," Lockhart said.

Freeh is promoting a new memoir, "My FBI: Bringing Down the Mafia, Investigating Bill Clinton and Waging War on Terror." He said his Khobar Towers investigation pointed to Iran, but said the probe was derailed by Clinton's desire to improve relations with the reformist Iranian government elected in 1997.

He said U.S. investigators only gained access to Saudi suspects in the bombing when former President George Bush, who sent American troops to defend the kingdom in the first Persian Gulf War, asked Abdullah for his assistance.

Asked why he did not resign and go public earlier, he said, "I had a different response. I said, 'This is too damn important for me to stop investigating it,' and I didn't stop investigating it. I wanted for a change of administration, which happened when this President Bush was elected."

Clinton named Freeh, a former FBI agent and federal judge, to lead the bureau in 1993 after the fiery raid that ended the Branch Davidian standoff in Waco, Texas. But Freeh's agents ended up conducting multiple investigations of his boss during the 1990s -- including the probe of the president's sexual relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, which resulted in his 1998 impeachment and eventual acquittal by the Senate.

Freeh said those investigations dominated his tenure. But Lockhart said Freeh wasted his time pursuing allegations of wrongdoing leveled by Clinton's political opponents.

"No one made Mr. Freeh go around and chase political rumors and scandals, to go and get into the depths of the president's personal life," Lockhart told CNN. "He did that to win favor and curry favor with the far right wing of this country. What he didn't do was run the FBI."

In his book, Freeh writes that he realized the United States was in a global war with terrorists after the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center and responses to terrorist attacks in the 1990s were inadequate.

"We lacked the political will, the spine, to take military action against our enemies," he told CBS. "It was obvious for years that that's what our position had been."

The 9/11 commission report issued in 2004 credited Freeh with recognizing the terrorist threat early on -- but it also criticized him for failing to shift FBI resources to combat it. And the Justice Department criticized him for failing to improve the FBI's computer network, which investigators said kept agents from "connecting the dots" before the 9/11 attacks.

Freeh told CBS that he had to ask Congress for permission to reassign agents.

Freeh resigned in June 2001, less than three months before al Qaeda's attacks on New York and Washington. On his last day in office, he revealed indictments against 13 Saudis and a Lebanese citizen in connection with the Khobar Towers bombing, all accused of being members of the Iranian-backed Islamic militia Hezbollah. The indictment stated that Iranian officials directed the bombing, but none were charged.

He said he remained in office until 2001 because he didn't want Clinton to name his successor.

"I was concerned about who he would put in there as FBI director because he had expressed antipathy for the FBI, for the director," he said. "I was going to stay there and make sure that he couldn't replace me."
 
Two observations:

1. Freeh is following the right-wing playbook on this? Whu- uh- why is that? He was the Democrat's appointee. I mean, if he was a Bush appointee, that might have credibility (might...). But This sounds like the Democratic Playbook in action. Page 1. Anyone who criticizes us is part of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.


2. Freeh might have waited to speak up until he was asked the question. I don't know the man's record or personality very well, but he never struck me as someone who would seek the spotlight like a politician would, post 9/11. Just a thought.
 
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former FBI Director Louis Freeh on Sunday accused former President Bill Clinton of ditching the investigation into the 1996 bombing of a U.S. barracks in Saudi Arabia to pursue better relations with Iran.

Yeah the former FBI director blames Clinton for his miserable performance on the terror front (even though he admitted all he had to do to shift manpower allocation to increase the terrorist investigation force was to ask Congress for a waiver). He had about 30X as many people allocated to "drug enforcement" as to terrorism.... and yet, the terror problem is all Clinton's fault.


On a parallel path, the former director of the CIA claims that they had Bin laden lined up for a "sure kill" but Clinton refused approval..... this, from the man and group who couldn't find Bin laden if he walked into the lobby at Langely and mooned the recptionist.

In reality, the CIA lined up a "sure kill" on a guy in a white robe spotted from a satellite who turned out to be a member of the royal family of one of our allies.

The bottom line is, the heads of all the organizations that failed so totally know have joined the "blame it all on Clinton" club. Clinton was a do-nothing partyer but that doesn't chnge the fact that they screwed up big time.
 
And there were a couple of talking crotches on Fox News dismissing Freeh's book as irrelevant... It is obvious that the reach of the Clinton tentacles is long
They sure ain't long enough to be able to strangle the mouth of Rupert Murdoch's GOP mouthpiece. If there was any meat on the bone to beat Clinton with, FOX would be on it like a hound dog on rib roast.
 
And why should i care...?

Clintons gone, this was years ago. Not to mentuion its a small issue.
Because the incompetent morons who fought turf wars and screwed off while the 9/11 plot was hatched and carried out are still throughout our intel services like roaches in the walls.... and they are all begging absolution by claiming "It was all Clinton's fault."
 
Anyone that has paid attention, AT ALL, knows the Clinton Administration sat on their hands when it came to terrorism. Bin Laden was offered up to us, and does Jamie Gorelick, and her handcuffing of America ring a bell? SHEESE!!!! They then put her on the 9/11 commission! :barf: Still, I would have more respect for Freeh, if he had spoke up louder, BEFORE he was selling a book.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top