Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

From Today's Chicago Tribune

Discussion in 'Legal' started by DonP, Apr 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DonP

    DonP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,294
    Location:
    Chicago area
    Considering that Chapman is a member of the Trib Editorial Board, this columns is kind of stunning. The link is here if anyone wants to read the enitre column.

    We had another round of killings last night on the South Side followed by another press conference with the new Police Commissioner, followed by the usual calls for banning .50 caliber rifles and assault weapons throughout the state.


    Link: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-oped0424...

    City misfires on gun violence
    Steve Chapman
    April 24, 2008

    When a rash of gun murders takes place, it makes sense for the police to do one of two things: renew tactics that have been effective in the past at curbing homicides, or embrace ideas that have not been tried before. But those options don't appeal to Chicago Police Supt. Jody Weis. What he proposes instead is a crackdown on assault weapons?


    I'm tempted to say this is the moral equivalent of a placebo—a sugar pill that is irrelevant to the malady at hand. But that would be unfair. Placebos, after all, sometimes have a positive effect. Assault weapons bans, not so much?


    If there are too many guns in Chicago, it's not because of any statutory oversight. The city has long outlawed the sale and possession of handguns. It also forbids assault weapons. If prohibition were the answer, no one would be asking the question.

    (edit)

    Gun control hasn't worked as a remedy for crime. So what makes anyone think the answer is more gun control?
     
  2. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    Linky no worky...
     
  3. DonP

    DonP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,294
    Location:
    Chicago area
  4. csmkersh

    csmkersh Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,050
    Location:
    San Antonio TX


    For direct link use THIS.
     
  5. BB62

    BB62 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    367
    Location:
    Ohio
    Thanks for the link. I sent the author a note, and I suggest everyone do the same.
     
  6. DonP

    DonP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,294
    Location:
    Chicago area
    Thanks for the help. I always have problems putting in links.

    FWIW, there is a comments section following the article where you can leave a thank you note or comment.

    In typical Trib fashion the comments (that are not published of course) tend to run about 20 to 1 in favor of gun rights.
     
  7. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Well, leftist extremists and completely stupid people would.
     
  8. Beagle-zebub

    Beagle-zebub Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    The think that struck me the most about the police chief's quote was that I'd seen nothing in the accompanying article to suggest that "assault weapons" had been used at all.
     
  9. Superpsy

    Superpsy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    463
    Location:
    Central OH
    I sent him a note. I hope that more people here do as well...
     
  10. kiko1

    kiko1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    32
    Location:
    OR.
    I did so as well. Rational thinking on this issue deserves recognition.
     
  11. MetalMan52

    MetalMan52 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    110
    This was a refreshing change from the normal columns written on guns and gun control here.
    I really think that it boils down to the fact that it's easier for them to blame some thing rather than admit that they have failed. How long have they been waging the "war on drugs"? How long have the gang task forces been in force? They have lost both battles and don't want to admit that fact. The two factors almost always go hand in hand in these shootings, gang related and drug related. Blame the weapon of choice and then the responsibility is deflected. The news keeps talking about "common sense" gun laws that are needed such as a ban on .50 cal rifles. When was the last time that a .50 cal rifle was used in a crime?
    What they don't want to talk about was how an existing state law prohibiting mental health patients from obtaining an FOID card failed miserably leading to the NIU shootings. The only explanation that I heard by the ILL state police was the he wasn't in their data base. I have a question....WHY NOT? It's like the news media doesn't want to even touch that one.
    Sorry for the rant but this state is so screwed up that it isn't even funny.
    Do you think there is any chance that Chapman would run for political office?
    Pat
     
  12. frankie_the_yankee

    frankie_the_yankee Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    Messages:
    466
    Location:
    Smithville, TX
    You're close, but the real reason is that it is easier to blame guns than to state forthrightly that Chicago happens to be a place inhabited by a high proportion of violent scumbags.

    It's not the guns of Chicago that are the problem. It is the large dirtbag population.

    Almost every city in America allows for easier (legal) access to guns than Chicago does. But most of them have far lower rates of violent crime.

    The problem is that if a politician tells his constituents the truth, that they are dirtbags, the dirtbags will get angry and vote him out in the next election.

    As long as irresponsible fools keep having children they don't know how or can't be bothered to raise, the ranks of the gangbangers will continue to be replenished and the overall situation will remain grim.

    Maybe if elected officials were joined by religious leaders and community activists where they all spoke with one voice to the general population, condemning their scummy behavior and telling them that it was about time they stopped acting like fools, it might make a difference. But this isn't gonna happen, because all too often the politicians, religious leaders, and community activists make excuses for dirtbag behavior instead of condemning it.

    Then they take the easy way out and condemn our constitutional rights instead.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page