Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Fundamental Flaw in US Form of Government

Discussion in 'Legal' started by DunedinDragon, Apr 9, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DunedinDragon

    DunedinDragon Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    375
    Having followed the numerous stories regarding abuse of position and authority by LEO's as well as a somewhat callous disregard in the Presidency for protecting the BOR for law-abiding citizen's, I'm beginning to wonder if there is a fundamental flaw in the way our government is set up for enforcement.

    As we all learned in 9th grade civics class, the Legislative Branch writes the laws, the Executive Branch enforces the law, and the Judicial Branch validates the law against the constitution. But the problem I see is that the Judicial System is purely a reactive component of government. They don't actively seek out and prosecute to enforce the BOR or constitutionally incorrect behaviors. Instead, they are purely reactive to the Executive Division who supposedly "watchdog's" their own potential abuses.

    Case in point, who evaluates police misconduct? The police. At a minimum there's a potential for conflict of interest, at worse total abuse and disregard for applying the same rule of law to enforcers as we do citizens.

    Am I looking at this correctly? It seems to me if the judicial were given teeth in the form of active investigation and prosecution authority of abuses there would be a better check and balance situation than what we currently have.
     
  2. Kodiaz

    Kodiaz member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    680
    Location:
    Palm Beach County
    We're the fundamental flaw. We tolerate it. It's easier to do nothing than to take action especially since the only power govt. understands is violence.


    When was the last time the feds burned down a house full of kids. They haven't done it since McVeigh blew up the building full of kids. Coincidence I think not.


    The founders ambushed a British patrol that was coming to take their guns.

    We call it an ambush I'm sure in the British papers of the time it was called murder.


    We have grown soft. We tolerate way too much. And when someone does something about it they are called a crazy murderer.

    The feds murdered a bunch of kids no one was punished through the legal system. McVeigh goes out blows up a building and it is full of kids.

    I hate to say it but it does equal it out.

    We are suppoosed to police the police. We are supposed to be the last check. The people are supposed to balance the govt.'s power when we don't we wind up where we are now.

    The politicians that we elect don't do what we want they do what the fatcat donors want. Now if politicians were to start showing up with a bullet in the head and a little sign no taxation without representation around their necks you would quickly see the authority of the donors go down.


    But when the people don't take measured action then you get a crazy person like McVeigh who goes to far.

    If all those guys involved in the Waco disaster were dealt with by the people after they got off scotfree from the legal system. The Murrah building might still be standing.


    Ok I just proofread this. And it is really bad but I think it makes sense I'll delete it after I get home from work if a mod sends me a PM. I worked 18 hrs yesterday. I'll have to read this when I get home today.
     
  3. BigFatKen

    BigFatKen Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    Messages:
    971
    Location:
    Auburn, AL
    Timothy vs. Tooky

    Let's ask Timothy McVeigh if he met with Zacharias Musawi in a hotel. Evidence shows they were in the same hotel at the same time.

    Oh, yeah, Timothy was killed at warp speed while Tooky got to breath for ~25 years.
     
  4. 1911 guy

    1911 guy Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,484
    Location:
    Garrettsville, Oh.
    Our biggest problem? People in general.

    Our Constitution was written to allow give us the most freedom with the fewest restrictions. Then a group of guys were put in charge to ensure that nobody messed with it or abused it. We are now more than two hundred years removed from that time and place, those men of honest intent are gone and nearly forgotten by many. People we have elected to take their places have pursued their own pocketbook and ego before the duty placed on them. Meanwhile, we sit around and complain that "There's nothing I can do".

    Our government, never meant to be perfect, was sufficient for a long time and can be again if leaders will step up to do the job for the sake of the job and Country, and We, The People stop accepting anything less from our elected representatives. Tall order, isn't it?
     
  5. Steam dragon

    Steam dragon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    140
    Location:
    N.E. Ohio
    In Re: McVeigh

    Habeus Corpus?

    My tin hat always seems too tight when I think about the "special federal team" that flew in to administere the execution (cough) and transport the carcas.

    Just another thing than makes me go "Hmm..."
     
  6. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    The state of affairs is not so much the result of bad design as it is bad people. No amount of tweaking can fix a government comprised of liars, despots, and power whores.

    "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other." - John Adams
     
  7. RealGun

    RealGun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,309
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    If you removed the cost of getting elected and imposed term limits, the government would be quite different, I believe. I think the Senate should go back to being appointed by State legislatures. Those who make a career out of going to Washington are the root of the problem. Incumbency with name recognition is an unfair advantage. The privilege of senior members to sit on powerfully influential committees makes them want to act as a tribunal for the Presidency, actively running the country instead of merely holding the executive branch accountable. They have the power to hold the Judicial accountable but don't use it. The only difference is that there is no partisan politics involved with the federal courts.
     
  8. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    The constitution doesn't "give" us freedom. It promises not to infringe upon our freedoms.

    At any rate, we have a bad habit of worshiping our Constitution. I often wonder if the Constitution itself isn't the source of our problems.

    Chew on this quote:

    "But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." - Lysander Spooner
     
  9. GoRon

    GoRon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,495
    Location:
    west burbs of Chicago
    How does that quote qo?

    America will cease to be great when her people cease to be good.
     
  10. neoncowboy

    neoncowboy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    636
    Location:
    land of cotton
    Another *huge* problem with our representative republic is that we allow everyone to vote...even illiterates who don't own anything.
     
  11. RealGun

    RealGun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,309
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    But it was okay to own slaves.:scrutiny: I am tired of hearing how sacred the original Constitution was and should remain. As we see with new democracies, a Constitution will not have enough substance to prevent a majority agreement, so that ratification is possible. Then the real work begins, which should not be left to the Courts to fabricate.
     
  12. Turkey Creek

    Turkey Creek Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2003
    Messages:
    356
    Location:
    MO
    The way I see it is the difference in the populace as a whole now compared to 200 or 100 years ago- Originially I think the populace didn't expect nor want governmental involvement in their lives other than to level the playing field so that everyone had as equal a chance to improve their lives as possible- Now we have a very large segment of the populace who depends on the government to provide for them through the myriad of entitlement programs that have developed over the years- This presents a radically different voting result than in the past- When you are beholding to the government for much of your life you will reward those that give by re electing your benefactors- The only way to reverse the slippery slope we find ourselves on is to have term limits everywhere in government- Unfortunately it's not going to happen, and as more and more of the populace finds themselves feeding at the trough of the government the more secure the government will be in enacting more and more restrictive legislation- Interesting that it's a lot like slavery
     
  13. Brett Bellmore

    Brett Bellmore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    979
    Location:
    Capac, Michigan
    There IS a fundamental flaw, it's the 17th amendment, direct election of Senators.

    The way our government was originally set up, it relied on setting interest against interest. Divide the power, and put it in the hands of people who had little reason to cooperate with each other unless on something self-evidently worth doing.

    As part of this, the Senate consisted of people appointed by state legislatures, and subject to removal by them. They were there to represent the interests of state governments, and did a pretty good job of making sure that federal power did not grow at the expense of the states. If they didn't, they could be replaced.

    The 17th amendment's direct election of Senators changed all that. Now, Senators have just as much interest as the House and President in the unchecked growth of federal power, and the states have no practical way to oppose any usurpation. And the judiciary lets the federal government get away with it, because they're nominated and confirmed by people who WANT those usurpations, and sellect the judges who will pass on them appropriately.

    We had a Constitution that worked pretty well. We broke it. And I don't see any way back, short of a constitutional convention, because the federal government won't originate any amendments to fix the problem, and with the help of the courts can "amend" the Constitution at will without the consent of the states. The states no longer have any way short of a Convention to exercise any check on federal power.

    And, honestly, if the states did call a Convention, I think it would just precipitate a confrontation where the federal government would refuse to allow it to take place, or would take it over in some way to cut the states out of the loop.
     
  14. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
    The fundamental flaw is US (as in you and me, not as in the acronym for United States). Our system of government was set up with the expectation that normal citizens would take some time off from conducting their normal lives to go to Washington and run the country. The concept of a year-round legislature filled with a bunch of congress critters who have never known any job other than being a congress critter wasn't even on the radar.

    It's our fault for re-electing these professional scam artists. This is why I advocate always voting against the incumbent. Nobody was supposed to spend 50 years or more in Congress. If they won't enact term limits ... we need to limit their terms in the only way available to us, the way that was built into the Constitution: vote 'em out.
     
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2006
  15. mordechaianiliewicz

    mordechaianiliewicz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,719
    Location:
    Western Missouri
    Oh, you think that's messed up, what about the fact that the Executive appoints Justices for life. And technically, the Executive could expand the judiciary if desired again.

    Also, because the states no longer elect senators, the senators are not beholden to fed gov, therefore making the 10th Amendment a joke.
     
  16. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    We will reach the point where slightly over 50% of the voters do not pay taxes. When this critical point is reached, it will be (by definition) tyranny. This is because the people who do not pay taxes can always be counted on to vote for tax increases.
     
  17. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    Sorry for the hijack, but this is my 1000th post.

    No party for me; I'm a black sheep here. ;) It's frick'n amazing the mods haven't booted me by now.

    So what prize do I get? Three days and two nights in Vegas? Heck, I'll even settle for the password to the secret "Over 1000" forum.
     
  18. Jeff Timm

    Jeff Timm Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2003
    Messages:
    933
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Don't get enamoured with the post count. It's wildly inaccurate. As note the two, 1000th number counts.

    Geoff
    Who doesn't expect perfection in computers. :rolleyes:
     
  19. Jeff Timm

    Jeff Timm Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2003
    Messages:
    933
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    As a former resident of Cuyahoga County Ohio, I've suspected for years that we have long passed the time when an honest vote count was possible. In the "democrat strongholds," like Cleveland, Ohio I believe the fraudulent votes keep them in office.

    It would not surprise me if I was still voting in Ohio and the straight democrat party ticket.

    Geoff
    Who is old grey and cynical. :mad: :banghead:
     
  20. Deavis

    Deavis Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2003
    Messages:
    1,424
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    While that sounds good, it simply isn't true. That very point was discussed in the Federalist Papers. As a matter of fact, one of the main reasons they gave for supporting the Constitution was that regular Joe's wouldn't have to be involved in the government, just a rep for them.

    however, they also counted on the political process drawing the brightest and best that America had to offer. They thought, I'm paraphrasing the main ideas read 6-12, that the reps would be the creme of the crop. They would be people with morals and patriotism who wished to see this country fulfill its destiny. They reasoned that even if part of them were corrupt or beholden to local interests, that the rest would fight back and not allow them to move the laws of the nation for a faction.

    Now the factions, lobbying groups, have the politicians beholden and guess what we get? Out reps are now elected on their ability to not do anything controversial and never to speak out in truthful terms.

    The Constitution isn't the problem, it is our lack of regard for its principles that is the problem.
     
  21. R.H. Lee

    R.H. Lee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    7,377
    Location:
    CA
    "Police misconduct" is a symptom, not the cause IMO. It's a red herring. The REAL problem is that government at all levels is too big, too powerful, and has too much of our money. We've stood by for the last, what, 40+ years and allowed the power grabs by way of increased taxes, laws, bureaucracies and regulations. Focusing on police misconduct misses the point entirely.
     
  22. DRZinn

    DRZinn Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    Messages:
    3,991
    Location:
    In a pot of water, 200 degrees and rising slowly..
    That's because it's a running total of all posts from him. Go back to his very first post and it will also read Posts: 1000.
     
  23. Kodiaz

    Kodiaz member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    680
    Location:
    Palm Beach County
    I just reread my post and if that didn't get me a mod PM I don't think I'll ever get one. Congrats on hitting 1000
     
  24. gc70

    gc70 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,030
    Location:
    North Carolina
    One of the flaws in our form of government is that it is predicated on a relatively small population to be effective. Representative democracy still works in small towns and counties where the people and their representatives actually interact.

    The nation's population has become too large for people at the national level of government to effectively be connected with the people. The population of the entire country was less than 4 million people in 1790; today, the state I live in has twice that population. To put that in prespective, my voice means half as much to one of my Senators today as it would have to the President in 1790.
     
  25. Beachmaster

    Beachmaster Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    117
    Location:
    Arizona
    When I take over as DICTATOR of the USA, I'll set things straight. I'll stay as dictator long enough to put back into place a downsized federal gov that includes term limits for all politicians, a NO LOBYIST rule (Lobyists will be shot on sight within 100 feet of any politician), maditory teaching of the REAL MEANING of the constitution in all schools (especially the part about how the second ammendment is about how the only real check to the govt's power is an armed populace), and I will change all the gun laws into the following:

    *All honest persons who have not been convicted of a felony, who do not have a history of drug or Alcohol abuse, and who are of sound mind may own, buy, sell, trade, and otherwise use and enjoy handguns, rifles, shotguns, and all other small arms.

    *All states shall turn into SHALL ISSUE states for CCW, and ALL STATES shall allow OPEN CARRY.

    *There will be a manditory 5 day waiting period to do a background check before buying any gun, unless the buyer has a current CCW permit, or is a FFL dealer.

    *New machine guns can be made and sold to the public, but would require a permit to own, sell or transfer.

    * Criminals who use a weapon in the commision of a crime will recieve a MANDITORY 25 years attached to their sentance. If this 25 years puts their sentance over a 75 year total, then they will recieve a manditory death penalty. Plea Bargains and downgrading charges to lesser ofenses will be outlawed.

    * Citizens who use a weapon in self defense will get at least 5 minutes of positive air time on local TV and radio news, a $1000 check from "Crimestoppers", and a big button that says "My gun saved the day!" to wave in the face of all the anti gunners.

    Prisoners on death row for gun deaths get a maximum of 1 appeal, and then their method of execution will be determined by the victims family. Stoning and Poking with Hot Pokers will be among the methods allowed.

    Last I will fix the homeland security problems by:

    Rolling all the federal law agencies into the FBI. The DEA, BATFE, etc would all be disbanded, and the FBI will now have jurisdiction over all federal areas.

    The National Guard Air Guard and Coast Guard will be rolled into one new agency called the HOMELAND GUARD. It will be resonsible to protect our shores and borders. The National Guard will no longer be sent to fight overseas before the reserves! The Guard will secure our borders from all invaders.

    Requiring manditory federal service in the SERVICE CORPS for all people in this country over the age of 18 for 2 years. Service Corp members could vol for the Military, or Guard, work in schools or hospitals, work on engineering projects like building schools or fixing roads, or a variety of other areas.

    To VOTE in any election would require a person to serve in the Service Corp!
    Current adults between the age of 18-65 would have to serve in an abridged version of the service corp to keep their voting rights. Adults over 65 would be grandfathered into the voting program.

    After I set all of this in motion, I will then step down as dictator and retire to
    Camp David West (Hawaii) and spend lazy days on the Camp David West 600 yard shooting range!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page