DunedinDragon
Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2005
- Messages
- 374
Having followed the numerous stories regarding abuse of position and authority by LEO's as well as a somewhat callous disregard in the Presidency for protecting the BOR for law-abiding citizen's, I'm beginning to wonder if there is a fundamental flaw in the way our government is set up for enforcement.
As we all learned in 9th grade civics class, the Legislative Branch writes the laws, the Executive Branch enforces the law, and the Judicial Branch validates the law against the constitution. But the problem I see is that the Judicial System is purely a reactive component of government. They don't actively seek out and prosecute to enforce the BOR or constitutionally incorrect behaviors. Instead, they are purely reactive to the Executive Division who supposedly "watchdog's" their own potential abuses.
Case in point, who evaluates police misconduct? The police. At a minimum there's a potential for conflict of interest, at worse total abuse and disregard for applying the same rule of law to enforcers as we do citizens.
Am I looking at this correctly? It seems to me if the judicial were given teeth in the form of active investigation and prosecution authority of abuses there would be a better check and balance situation than what we currently have.
As we all learned in 9th grade civics class, the Legislative Branch writes the laws, the Executive Branch enforces the law, and the Judicial Branch validates the law against the constitution. But the problem I see is that the Judicial System is purely a reactive component of government. They don't actively seek out and prosecute to enforce the BOR or constitutionally incorrect behaviors. Instead, they are purely reactive to the Executive Division who supposedly "watchdog's" their own potential abuses.
Case in point, who evaluates police misconduct? The police. At a minimum there's a potential for conflict of interest, at worse total abuse and disregard for applying the same rule of law to enforcers as we do citizens.
Am I looking at this correctly? It seems to me if the judicial were given teeth in the form of active investigation and prosecution authority of abuses there would be a better check and balance situation than what we currently have.