Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Garand, WWII Issue quality

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by DMK, Aug 14, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    Would soldiers in WWII have gotten issued field grade rifles?
     
  2. MikeH

    MikeH Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Messages:
    571
    Location:
    MoCo, MD
    Why not? I'd bet units still equipped with 1903 and other less advanced rifles would have been glad to take them.
     
  3. Steve in PA

    Steve in PA Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,568
    Location:
    NE PA
    The Garands were all new back in the day. The grading CMP uses was after they were used and abused, then sent to the CMP for sale. In other words, if you get a rack grade from the CMP, that means it was used and abused while in service.
     
  4. 30Cal

    30Cal Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,294
    Location:
    Albany, NY
  5. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    They certainly weren't new after 3 or 4 years of combat.
     
  6. BigG

    BigG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    7,081
    Location:
    Dixieland
    3 or 4 years of combat? I thought the vast majority of the mobilization came in 1944 and petered out in 1945. Maybe a year, year and a half. I'm not talking about the naval battles in the Pacific.
     
  7. Limeyfellow

    Limeyfellow Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,394
    Location:
    NC, USA
    Pretty much. They didn't really start producing them on mass until 1941, and weren't being seen on general issue until 1943. By early on 1944 they had already started spitting out M1 Carbines at a faster rate as they were easier and quicker to make and since they didn't have enough M1 Garands alot of these got issued too especially with the island hopping.

    I know of 5 veterans that served and 3 of them were issued the M1 Carbine, though one dumped it for an M1 Garand, though he was a forward observer on Iwo Jima and on top of the volcano all night. Before getting sent off they were still being trained on the M1903a3s.
     
  8. Steve in PA

    Steve in PA Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,568
    Location:
    NE PA
    There were no "rack grades" or any other grades of rifles during WWII. The Garands were issued brand new. If you came to a unit you may have got a Garand that was used by a GI that was killed, captured, etc. The rifle was turned into the armory for re-issue to the next GI.

    Again, the "grades" are put out my CMP......NOT the US Army.
     
  9. cbsbyte

    cbsbyte Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,978
    Location:
    Cradle of Liberty
    Most of the rifles sold by the CMP have served in both American and foreign militaries. Millions of Garands after WWII where loaned to many countries around the world. After many decades of hard service they where returned to the US as surplus. Many where destroyed, a small % are being sold by the CMP. The CMP is not part of the military so the grades have nothing to do with military issue.
     
  10. cracked butt

    cracked butt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    6,986
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    They just had to meet minimum specs for function and within a certain spec for throat and Muzzle wear. CMP didn't invent the TE and Muzzle guages afterall.
     
  11. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    Thanks 30cal, this is helpful and very interesting:

    http://www.fulton-armory.com/tea/tm-fig23.htm

    So what does a "3 on a muzzle gauge" (to use CMP's jargon) mean as compared to where Army ordanance says the bore must be Max. 0.306 to be issued and Max. 0.310 to stay in service?

    I understand that.

    But..
    I guess what I'm asking is would a rifle of "CMP field grade" have been issued to a soldier deployed to land on Okinawa, or how about later in Korea? Or would they have been all issued "CMP service grade" or better?
     
  12. Wes Janson

    Wes Janson Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,962
    The question is, just how badly beat up would an M1 have to be before they'd pull it from service and give the soldier another one instead?
     
  13. Gator

    Gator Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2003
    Messages:
    2,231
    Location:
    Stuck in Crook Co., IL
    Quite possibly. The CMP field grade allows some minor hairline cracks in the stocks which unit armorers would probably have fixed, but the bore and muzzle specs are within US Army limits.

    A "3" on the muzzle gauge = .303.
     
  14. tkendrick

    tkendrick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    351
    Location:
    Wittmann, Arizona
    My uncle was with a graves registration unit. He once told me that the procedure was to secure all the weapons they found and send them back to Battalion where they were inspected, repaired as needed and issued to replacements.

    I would imagine that they used bore guages as part of the inspection process, but every-one is right. My first two years in the service was as a unit armorer, and I never heard the terms rack grade or service grade until I bought my first M1 from CMP.
     
  15. Sunray

    Sunray Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,791
    Location:
    London, Ont.
    "...pull it from service and give..." If a troopie wanted another rifle, he'd lose the old one and get another one. Whether it came from his unit or not is another thing.
    Okinawa kit would depend on what unit the troopie was in. Some units came directly from the U.S. Some were experienced troopies from Australian, et al training bases. All their kit would be serviceable, no matter where they came from.
    Korean War kit was pulled out of storage and issued. It may have been new or rebuilt, but they'd be serviceable. The CMP's "Service Grade" is likely as close as it gets.
     
  16. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    Thanks, but my question wasn't about the terminology specifically.

    Thank you!


    http://www.fulton-armory.com/tea/tm-fig23.htm

    So it looks like a even a "CMP Field Grade" would have been well above the "issuable for combat" threshold according to the Army specs above.

    What I find especially interesting is the Army doesn't appear to have a spec for muzzle wear listed there, assuming that "Breach Bore" is a measure throat wear.
     
  17. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    Most garands would not have seen that length of service. D Day occurred in on June 6, 1944... and the war was over in 1945. We were a different country back then, I guess, and didn't let wars drag on indefinitely like we do now.

    Most of the garands produced in WWII were probably never fired in anger.
     
  18. 30Cal

    30Cal Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,294
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    Correct. MW is a relatively new measurement and wasn't used for M1's in the service.
     
  19. praharin

    praharin Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    422
    Location:
    Pennsyltucky
    you mean like WW 1? 1914-1918 as i recall. and the american revolution was 5 or 6 years too. i guess you are right. this country was different back then, look at back then :rolleyes:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page