I love talking about RKBA with anti's. I find it energizing. The discussion may cover violence statistics, Constitution, intent of the framers, or the legal history or gun bans in the US. But I always try to steer it back to a priciple.
Do you believe that an individual, if attacked by a criminal intent on doing that person harm, has the right to defend themselves?
If so, what tools does the person have the right to use? Hands? Stick? Knife? Firearm? Its interesting to see where others draw that line.
Do you believe that an individual, if attacked by a criminal intent on doing that person harm, has the right to defend themselves?
If so, what tools does the person have the right to use? Hands? Stick? Knife? Firearm? Its interesting to see where others draw that line.
