Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Glock 17 Gen 3 vs. Gen 4.

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Allist816, Jul 24, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Allist816

    Allist816 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    27
    Which of the two should I go with. I know the Gen 4 has some improvements over the Gen 3 but their are more spare parts out there for the Gen 3. Is the Gen 4 more Heavy Duty then The Gen 3.:confused:
     
  2. W.E.G.

    W.E.G. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    7,392
    Location:
    all over Virginia
    The big issue is the Gen 4 has the "double-spring" recoil spring.
    There have been some breakage issues.

    The other issues are cosmetic - like the shape of the serrations on the slide and the texture of the frame.

    My Glocks are Gen 3, and I have no interest in the "improvements" of the Gen 4.
     
  3. bds

    bds Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    13,664
    Location:
    Northwest Coast
    Gen3 Glocks already came with fairly stiff captured recoil spring sets (dual-springs for subcompacts). Gen4 Glocks have even stiffer recoil springs sets (now dual springs even for the full-size models).

    I shoot mostly reloads and would not like to push my loads even higher to reliably cycle the Gen4 slides. Most of my reloads are loaded to mid-to-high range load data. Stiffer recoil springs mean that only high range to near max load data charges will reliably cycle the slide on Gen4 Glocks.

    I am happy with my Gen3 Glocks and the recoil spring rate for my reloads. If Glock addresses the recoil spring rate or offer less-stiff replacement set comparable to Gen3 spring rate, I would buy Gen4 Glocks.
     
  4. REAPER4206969

    REAPER4206969 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,037
    Location:
    Idaho
    No.
     
  5. klash545

    klash545 Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    141
    Location:
    Fort Worth,Texas
    stick with the gen3,they aren't cancelling production of them for a reason
     
  6. CountGlockula

    CountGlockula Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,522
    Location:
    In a Los Angeles coffin.
    I have a Gen4G17 and love it. Recoil is much more reduced. I'd say get both generations to build your collection.
     
  7. Balrog

    Balrog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,986
    Is Glock making both Gen4 and Gen3 pistols now?

    Why are they going to continue making Gen3?

    Yea that 9mm recoil is a real wrist breaker.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2010
  8. REAPER4206969

    REAPER4206969 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,037
    Location:
    Idaho
    Yes. A member of AR15.com attended a private meeting for U.S. Embassy staff at Glock headquarters, Deutsch-Wagram, Austria. This question was asked, and this was their answer:

    There are various reasons.

    1)The GEN3 Glock is one of, if not the best selling handguns on the planet.

    2)Glock has thousands of LE/MIL contracts, many of whom that specify exactly what is to be delivered (GEN3.) This is why Beretta had to make two versions of their model 92. The "92FS" with the radiused tang/slanted dust cover/three dot sights, and the "M9" to MIL-SPEC.

    3)As of 2007 there are five million Glock's in circulation. These pistols need to be supported with parts, so Glock might as well keep making complete pistols.

    4)GEN4 optioned models can not be sold in California. Only the GEN3 can. California is one of the worlds largest consumers of firearms, it would be nonsensical to kill off that market.

    5)I doubt many models can receive the GEN4 alterations (18/25/28/36.)

    6)The GEN4 was never intended to replace the GEN3. It is only an option for those that feel the need for the features it offers. Here is Glock headquarters official position on the GEN4:
    http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=13&t=91249&page=3
     
  9. Balrog

    Balrog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,986
    What was the perceived need for the Gen4? It seems to me my Gen3 is just fine.

    What "improvements" (or changes) does the Gen 4 have?
     
  10. REAPER4206969

    REAPER4206969 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,037
    Location:
    Idaho
    A lot of midgets/Edward Sausagehands whine about the grip size.

    1)Dual recoil spring assembly.

    2)2mm shorter backstrap with two, 2mm increment larger add-on backstraps.

    3)Enlarged, reversible magazine catch.

    4)RTF3 frame texture.
     
  11. bds

    bds Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    13,664
    Location:
    Northwest Coast
    One of many complaints that's been raised against Glocks has been the grip/angle. S&W M&P addressed this issue by offering three different "palm swell" inserts that work surprisingly well. My first impression of handling the M&P was a grip that fit my hand like a glove with a more "natural" grip angle of 1911/Sig.

    Many owners of Glocks also have shaved/melted the "grip hump" to make the grip more straight. The Gen4 grip inserts now offer the owners the option to keep the hump or reduce it.

    Although I am a fan of Gen3 Glocks, I will admit that ergonomics of pistol controls could be improved. Magazine release requires a shift in grip and some owners have difficulty with the small slide lock/release. There are quite a lot of semi-auto pistols on the market now that have very good ergonomics that do not require a shift in grip to release magazine or slide. Gen4 Glocks also try to address these ergonomics issues.

    I do not believe Gen4 is more "heavy duty" than Gen3. It does have stiffer recoil spring that reduces felt recoil for heavy charged factory JHPs. This however, aggravates the "limp wrist" issue and decreases reliable slide cycling with some "lighter charge" factory ammunition and light charge reloaded ammunition (some reloaders have posted that few published starting charge load won't cycle the Gen4 slide reliably).

    Like the Rough Texture Frame (RTF) and the Short Frame (SF) Glock models, Gen4 models may become another option in the growing Glock product line. I prefer the Gen3 over Gen4 for many reasons that are personal.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page