Glock 43X any thoughts?

The 43X has been my EDC since they came out. I've used the Shield Arms 15 rd mags with no issue so far and upgraded the magazine release. Trying 5 shot drills @ 10 yds. Goal is 6in or less in 10 seconds. I need more practice.
G43X.jpg
 
The only mod required for Shield mags is the installation of a metal Magazine Release on your Glock. The original or any other plastic release will get damaged.
The metal (steel is best) mag release isn’t required immediately, but the metal Shield mag will, as used, start to dig and wear out the plastic Glock OEM part.
 
Ah, ok. Im seeing on the interwebnets that there is an actual company called Shield Arms making making 43X magazines. Are these what we are talking about?I was thinking of magazines for the S&W Shield 9......?
I also have the mag release. I’ll respond to your message in a bit.
 
Palmetto State Armory also makes a 15 round magazine for the dagger micro/43X pattern

I haven’t tried them yet.
I had some issues with mine. I had some stovepipes unless they were downloaded to 13 rounds or less. Also. The baseplates are plastic and a bit thin- they "bowed" out a bit after a while and the warpage was still there even when they were unloaded. If Id kept the gun, probably would've added aluminum baseplates- assuming someone makes them, lol.
The nice thing about them was they have a polymer sheath on the front and don't require modifying the mag release.
 
Yes, completely different company from S&W.
I haven’t met or heard a person yet say one disparaging thing about them or their products.
Seriously?
We have multi page threads just here on THR.
Shield Arms mags have been problematic since day one.


Most telling is that Shield itself recognized a problem with their mags.
First they said a metal mag catch wasn't needed except for "high volume" shooters.
First they said their mags worked just fine with the factory mag catch.
First they said if you are one of those high volume shooters we'll sell you an aluminum mag catch.

Then........that all changed because, well, PROBLEMS.

Then they said a metal mag catch WAS NEEDED.
Then their own aluminum mag catch wasn't good enough, you need a steel mag catch.
Then they said their metal catch wasn't good with factory mags.

But its UNDENIABLE that enough people have had enough poor experiences with Shield mags that the manufacturer has done a 180 on their own recommendations and made changes to the S15 magazine.
 
I have a 43x that is my daily carry when I’m wearing enough clothes to conceal it. I pocket carry a Ruger LCR in .327 mag when I don’t. The 43x is one of the VERY few automatic pistols that has never experienced a malfunction (can’t say that for my Gen 5 Glock 20). I only use factory mags.

Like all small 9’s, it’s not an easy gun to shoot so get lots of practice.
 
Seriously?
We have multi page threads just here on THR.
Shield Arms mags have been problematic since day one.
Read what I said: I haven’t met or heard a person yet say one disparaging thing about them or their products.
“I” as in me.

And I stand by this. I never searched here for these mags.
 
To establish a touch of credibilty
glock.jpg

I own the G 43X. Even have a G 19X. Had substantial experience with Glocks having been issued the G 23 a ways back.

I admire Glock pistols' reliability. I don't however, care for the trigger dingus. And, for many of us, the Glock grip angle just doesn't do it.

I find the SIG P-365 models far more ergonomic, with clearly superior (flat-faced) triggers and far better factory night sights (the X-Rays with the big front dot are excellent). The 365 comes from the factory with 12 or 15 round magazines that actually function, no aftermarket purchases or amateur 'smithing on the mag release required.

I would quite confidently carry a 43X. It's flat, conceals well, functions perfectly. It would not, however, be my first choice.
 

I have

Like all small 9’s, it’s not an easy gun to shoot so get lots of practice.
I’ll be the first to say everyone is different and every gun is different. My 43x is the most shootable auto I have, I hit targets way better than I should with a small 9mm golf balls @30 yards 80% of the time I can hit with it just as well as I can with my single six or Blackhawk with a 7-1/2 inch barrel
And I am not talking about off a rest
 
Read what I said: I haven’t met or heard a person yet say one disparaging thing about them or their products.
“I” as in me.

And I stand by this. I never searched here for these mags.
There are literally millions of people, companies and products I haven't met or heard of that "I" wouldn't comment on until "I" as in me.......did a thirty second Google search on. ;)

I'm not calling you a liar, but pointing out the fallacy of your post. It's an anecdotal fallacy, often referred to as personal incredulity. This fallacy occurs when someone dismisses a claim or argument based on their personal lack of experience or understanding, rather than addressing the evidence or reasoning behind the claim. It implies that personal experience is the only valid form of evidence, which is not a sound basis for evaluating the truth of a statement.
 
I had a 43X first,then bought a 48 MOS. I sold the 43x,not because of anything wrong with it. I thought it a very nice pistol,I just found my LC9S better suited for my carry use. I still have the 48 as a nightstand guardian. On the other topic on this thread I purchased the Shield mags 1.0, changed out the mag catch,had failures to feed,changed it back to OEM catch and mags pronto. The Shield mags and catch are still around in my playpen somewhere.
 
There are literally millions of people, companies and products I haven't met or heard of that "I" wouldn't comment on until "I" as in me.......did a thirty second Google search on. ;)

I'm not calling you a liar, but pointing out the fallacy of your post. It's an anecdotal fallacy, often referred to as personal incredulity. This fallacy occurs when someone dismisses a claim or argument based on their personal lack of experience or understanding, rather than addressing the evidence or reasoning behind the claim. It implies that personal experience is the only valid form of evidence, which is not a sound basis for evaluating the truth of a statement.
You are calling me a liar. Period. You have your opinion. I have mine.
If you want to be insulting do it somewhere else.
 
You are calling me a liar. Period. You have your opinion. I have mine.
No sir, I didn't write or imply anything of the sort. I wrote "Seriously?"
Thats incredulity given the numerous threads and posts on the web regarding Shield S15 magazines.

You can't read a thread on the 43X or 48 without seeing comments on aftermarket magazines.


If you want to be insulting do it somewhere else.
I wasn't. "Seriously?" isn't an insult. It's a genuine response to a comment thats difficult to believe.
 
No sir, I didn't write or imply anything of the sort. I wrote "Seriously?"
Thats incredulity given the numerous threads and posts on the web regarding Shield S15 magazines.

You can't read a thread on the 43X or 48 without seeing comments on aftermarket magazines.



I wasn't. "Seriously?" isn't an insult. It's a genuine response to a comment thats difficult to believe.
You said you weren’t calling me a liar then proceeded to basically say I was. No matter. I am done discussing that with you.

In your first post you talked about your Micro Dagger mag and how happy you are with it. You should probably take your own advice and research those.
I did. I bought 3 of them. They failed due to too much polymer getting into the mag tube during manufacture and hanging up the follower. PSA replaced the mags and I had the same issue with 2. One phone call back and they apologized and reimbursed my money once I sent them all back on their dime.
This was in early 2024. I was told by a PSA rep that they were refining their manufacturing practices in regard to their mags. I hope they corrected their issues.
I am glad you are happy with those mags. There are many that weren’t.
 
You said you weren’t calling me a liar then proceeded to basically say I was. No matter. I am done discussing that with you.
Oh please. I did no such thing, and that you say I did ......IS A LIE. ;)




In your first post you talked about your Micro Dagger mag and how happy you are with it. You should probably take your own advice and research those.
What makes you think I didn't?

I didn't jump on the Shield mags bandwagon because of my customers complaints and I waited until the Micro Daggers had been out for almost a year before buying. I DID my research.
 
I didn't jump on the Shield mags bandwagon because of my customers complaints and I waited until the Micro Daggers had been out for almost a year before buying. I DID my research.
At that time when I had my G48 and my G43 I decided to go back to Glock mags and stop trying to make my G48 a higher capacity gun through aftermarket mags.
I did the same with my G43,
I sold them both in May of ‘24.
 
Back
Top