mljdeckard
Member
Recoil wasn't the problem the .40 solved. The problem it solved was how to put a more powerful cartridge into existing 9mm frames. THAT'S why it pushed the 10mm aside.
Originally posted by mljdeckard: I recently had this discussion with an army major, who has been deployed to Iraq twice. He was convinced that there is never a reason to have a round chambered, as it is unsafe.
The guy at the store is a moron, and definitely someone you don't want to take training lessons with.The guy at the store that sold it to me carries the same gun, and he says he carries without a round chambered and racks it as he draws.
imho, the only way to carry is with one in the chamber. if you don't feel safe with a loaded gun then you shouldn't be carrying
Only when I carry it. If I don't load it there isn't much point in carrying it.Do most other Glock owners/carriers carry with one in the chamber?
I guess this goes for revolvers too huh? This board is full of tactical geniuses.One in the chamber is fine IF, and only IF, you have a good holster for your Glock.
I guess this goes for revolvers too huh? This board is full of tactical geniuses.
Exactly!Carrying a Glock in a holster that covers the trigger is vital because the trigger pull is only 5.5 pounds. You can pocket carry a revolver or put it in a purse because the trigger pull is 12 pounds.