Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gov't looks for "Gun Melting" super spray

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by depicts, Mar 4, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. depicts

    depicts Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2005
    Messages:
    329
    I just saw this on the Military.com website. I thought it was pretty interesting...that the Military is looking for a way to destroy huge arms caches with a non reversable instant spray.

    http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002213.html

    Almost everywhere they go in Iraq, American soldiers find stacks of explosives and guns. According to one 2004 survey, at least 7 million small arms -- including AK-47 rifles, rocket launchers and mortar tubes, and more sophisticated arms like ground-to-air missiles -- have fallen into the hands of Iraqi civilians since "Mission Accomplished" in 2003.

    U.S. troops would like to get rid of all of those weapons, as they find them. "However, the extremely large number of both weapons and storage sites has rendered global securing and destruction of caches nearly impossible," notes Darpa, the Pentagon's way-out research arm.

    What the agency want to see instead: a non-toxic spray that can "penetrate rapidly into the [weapon's] active firing and/or actuation mechanisms and render them instantly and permanently inoperable."

    The formulation will produce an accelerated corrosion (or other) reaction over a longer period of time (a few months or less), perhaps using the weapon material itself as a metallic catalyst, to destroy the weapon internal structure. The formulation must be effective in small quantities (i.e., a few grams per weapon), safe to use, stable over the range of operational temperature/humidity conditions, have a long shelf-life, be capable of large-area dissemination, and produce a non-toxic residue after the weapon is destroyed...

    [The spray] must not be reversed by simple chemical, thermal, or other means. Such a chemical system has the potential to enable the systematic and effective removal of small arms from the battlespace.

    March 3, 2006 01:59 PM | Ammo and Munitions
     
  2. kjeff50cal

    kjeff50cal Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    686
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    cosmoline??? :evil:

    kjeff50cal
     
  3. 1911Tuner

    1911Tuner Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Messages:
    18,550
    Location:
    Lexington,North Carolina...or thereabouts
    Super Melter

    Willy Peter comes to mind...
     
  4. Pork Fat

    Pork Fat Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    157
    Location:
    Charleston SC
    The coffee we have at work-ugh.
     
  5. Manedwolf

    Manedwolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    3,693
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    And of course, the enemy will NEVER get hold of the formula, make their own, and break our $$$$ tanks, helicopters and support equipment with it...

    That sounds like the ideal tool for a guerilla insurgency to use to wreak havoc on an invading, superior force, NOT something a "superpower" needs.
     
  6. blackhawk2000

    blackhawk2000 member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2003
    Messages:
    851
    Location:
    Mi
    Why don't they get a civilian contractor over their, have them demill them, and then ship them to companies like Century. The whole process should pay for itself if done properly. Then AK prices should drop here in the States[​IMG]
     
  7. erik the bold

    erik the bold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    325
    Location:
    Middle of the Mitten, Somewhere' Nort of Hell
    Wouldn't a nice salt water bath or two do about the same?

    Or, as an alternative, send 'em all to Rouge Steel. It could be your next F150 :uhoh:
     
  8. Thain

    Thain Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    704
    Location:
    Lansing, Michigan
    Load them all up in crates, but them on a cargo ship, bring them to port in Detroit and start selling them through the Civillian Marksmanship Program. :D

    The Iraqi rebellion wouldn't have them anymore, and they'd be in the hands of law-abiding Yankees! Win/Win!
     
  9. One of Many

    One of Many Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    370
    Location:
    Shiawassee County
    Does the chemical warfare restriction apply to the use of hydroflouric acid as a metal cleaner; this stuff is used as an etching solution - but it is hazardous to human touch and by inhalation. If the weapons were sprayed with this, and signs posted all around the area that toxic substances were applied to the weapons, would that meet requirements of treaties?

    Anyone that handled the weapons without measures being taken to remove the hydroflouric acid would suffer severe burns and pain, with possible fatality; assuming only the terrorists would attempt to recover the weapons, and therefore be exposed, is this allowable?
     
  10. boofus

    boofus Guest

    What about driving a M1 tank over them?

    It won't work well on the artillery shells, rockets, and explosives but for regular small arms I think it'd be a cost effective way to render them inoperable.
     
  11. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,056
    Location:
    SouthEast PA
    Apparently, no one thought of backing up a cement mixer, folding out the chute, and pulling the spill leverl. :scrutiny:
     
  12. Spiggy

    Spiggy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Messages:
    651
    Location:
    The Sunny PR of Kalifornistanichevolakia, Right be
    why not just slather it with pork fat?

    I mean, it is non-toxic:evil:

    anyways, dont the iraqi people also have some natural rights to own firearms too?
     
  13. marshall3

    marshall3 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    326
    Location:
    Signal Mountain, TN
    Sell them to the Iraqi's...

    Don't we believe in the 2nd amendment?
    Don't we believe in "Thou shalt not steal?"
    These guns belong to the Iraqi people. Arm the people, and let them fight for whatever government they like. Then we can go home.
     
  14. MatthewVanitas

    MatthewVanitas Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,463
    Location:
    Burlington, Vermont and Montreal, Québec
    We found out that driving an LAV over them sure won't do much; probably get much better results with the M1.

    Most of the demilling I saw done in Iraq was achieved by propping the barrel of the AK up on one rock, lifting a BFR (big frickin' rock) up over the head, and throwing it down. Usually two or three hits with a 60lb BFR would break the receiver, and then it would all go in the burn pit.

    But we kept the good-condition AKs to issue to Iraqi police and Iraqi Nat'l Guard. One day we had a convoy down to a small farming town to pass a few score AKs over to the local ING unit, and the captain asked me if there was any device we could use to disable the AKs in a hurry if we came under attack by insurgents. I thought a minute, and replied "Sir, if our convoy is hit so hard that insurgents are unloading the rifles from the rear of your Humvee, we probably have much larger problems to deal with."



    This whole "Gun-B-Gone" spray sounds like they're putting too much thought into it. Crushing followed by burning seems a lot more practical for non-explosives, and simple mass burns out in the open desert for explosives.

    -MV
     
  15. Zen21Tao

    Zen21Tao Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,960
    Location:
    Gainesville, Fl
    How long before gun grabbers adopt a similar program to find a way to quickly dissolve legally owned firearm? What we need is a criminal melting spray. :D
     
  16. paul45

    paul45 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    Messages:
    371
    Yes, I will take it a step further.....a Democrat dissolving spray...:neener:
     
  17. DesertRat

    DesertRat Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2003
    Messages:
    117
    Well, this is likely a long shot, but two thoughts.

    1. Perhaps they ought to think about going through some type of a bid process to allow small businesses locally, throughout Iraq disassemble or otherwise destroy these weapons and then recylcle the scrap metal for other uses. I'm sure Iraq has plenty need for varying grades of metals for their reconstruction efforts.

    However, I realize that from a practical standpoint many of those guns may be made from metals which are inferior. I'm thinking specifically of the the virtually home made grade AK's and the like (isn't it amazing what some of those guys can build over there with some simple hand tools?).

    2. Alternatively have somebody (contractor) go through the literally dump truck loads of small arms to determine which guns are of decent quality and serviceable. Clean those weapons up and then reissue them to Iraqi police / military forces.

    Any remaining, unservicable weapons can simply be sent to the smelter and recycled. I know, I know, that's assuming they have a smelter anywhere in that country.
     
  18. 2TransAms

    2TransAms Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2006
    Messages:
    814
    Location:
    Illinois,by St. Louis MO
    Clean 'em up and trade 'em back for oil.

    That won't happen.

    So,I'm sure they have chemicals that will dissolve your receiver,but I guess they want something more localized,that will do it quickly and won't contaminate a large area.
     
  19. gezzer

    gezzer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,052
    Location:
    NH
    Sell,them to SARCO in a few days of their storage and they will be renderd useless junk!:evil:
     
  20. denfoote

    denfoote Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,622
    Location:
    Near the border of occupied Azlan and Mexico.
    +1000!!!!

    The problem is that Bushco doesn't really believe in that section of the Constitution. Yeah, he SAYS he does, and I'm gunna take a lot of heat for this, but the fact that there is NO right to keep and bear arms in the NEW Iraqi Constitution bears witness that he really wants to keep guns OUT of the hands of the people!!
     
  21. MrTwigg

    MrTwigg Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    570
    As only an enlisted man can say...

    Ya made my day ! :D 'Scuse me whilst I wipe the coffee off the screen.
     
  22. Vic

    Vic Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Messages:
    145
    Sell 'em to Sarco???

    I liked that statement. I bought from them ONCE...I learned quickly!
     
  23. Justin

    Justin Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    Which sounds typical of DARPA.

    After all, this is the same group of government brainiacs that's working on remote control sharks.

    I just hope they have the sense to put some frickin' laser beams on 'em.
     
  24. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,750
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    The primary component of Magic is Unobtanium. The government's substitute is Expensivium.

    :), Art
     
  25. CDignition

    CDignition Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    897
    Location:
    Sarasota Florida
    2nd Amendment applies to the US, not Iraq...if Iraq has a right to bear arms in their constitution, I would be surprised..they wrote it, not us...

    Mission Accomplished...sigh.I keep seeing this and keep having to explain it to dunderheads who mis understood it... It simply meant we were done wit hMAJOR conflict in the country...all the stuff that has been happening there(except for the Fallujah stufff) is just minor and terrorist related..the main mission of getting Saddam gone and getting rid of the Batthists there....looks like that was true.


    As for the guns, just run em through a steel shredder...no problem,lol
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page