Great day for watching the Bush admin implode

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Malone LaVeigh

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,136
Location
Washed out of Four-dollar Bayou. Now I'm... somewh
Scooter's singing, Brownie's complaining the WH abandoned him, an ex-CIA official has confirmed what anyone who isn't dead already knew about admin spin on Iraq, and the Reps can't even get their sound system to work right.

Though that last one reminds me too much of:

[nixon]... but that would be illegal![/nixon].

Not a good day for Bush loyalists. (Bush torys? Let's call them Bories.)

Yes, I'm feeling like my civil liberties might be getting some long-overdue CPR pretty soon. It's begining to feel a lot like the early 70s.

Y'all have a great weekend. See you at the range.
 
Malone LaVeigh said:
Scooter's singing, Brownie's complaining the WH abandoned him, an ex-CIA official has confirmed what anyone who isn't dead already knew about admin spin on Iraq, and the Reps can't even get their sound system to work right.

Though that last one reminds me too much of:

[nixon]... but that would be illegal![/nixon].

Not a good day for Bush loyalists. (Bush torys? Let's call them Bories.)

Yes, I'm feeling like my civil liberties might be getting some long-overdue CPR pretty soon. It's begining to feel a lot like the early 70s.

Y'all have a great weekend. See you at the range.
Click to expand...

Here's the problem. The significant voices of the Democratic Party have no interest in resuscitating your civil liberties. They are authoritarians.

Do the names Feinstein, Kennedy, Clinton or Kerry make you think "Yay, Freedom!"? If so, you must not read much.

Speaking of reading, have you read about Reid and Abramoff? Same corruption, different letter by his name on CNN.

The problem with Bush Derangement Syndrome is that it leads people to think only of their knee-jerk hatred for GW Bush, without giving any thought to the real alternative.

News flash: the Libertarian Party has a snowflake's chance in hell of getting a single Congressman in office. The next party in power will either be the R's or D's. Be careful what you wish for.
 
They are imploding because deep inside themselves, they are rotten beyond belief. Corruption, incompetence, and weakness do their damage regardless of what spin a Rove can put on them.

"The truth... in the end, there it is." Winston Churchill

I would be the first to throw a party watching them crash and burn, if I did not realize that We the People are to pay for their mismanagement.

The only hope for this country is the breach of the Kane-Kodos system. Otherwise, eventually we will be expected to choose between a douchebag and a turd sandwich.
 
What administration, really, has been a good one in the last few decades?

Nixon? LOL

Ford? Golfed while Rome's butt burned with the sometimes-fatal Swine Flu shot.

Carter? Nope.

Reagan? Some highlights, and some lowlights (e.g. the Drug War).

Bush 41? Got Iraq out of Kuwait, then left the real problems for the next people.

Clinton? At least he was such a poll-watcher that he went for welfare reform, but other stuff was downright scary.

W? Tax cuts. That was good. Then went RINO. Was better than Carter when handling Islamofascism. Better choice than Gore or Kerry; that's saying little.

Reality: I care more about the country than which of these $%^&heads is in office. I take no particular joy in seeing someone go down, just to be replaced by someone worse.

In 1930, the Germans were fed up with their incompetent government and the economic disaster that had befallen them. They started voting for the Nazis. By 1933, the German equivalent of "Anybody but Bush!" got them Hitler.

You have to THINK here, not just feel some sense of "righteous anger." What's important is the country, not some guy in Washington. I wouldn't lend $5 to ANY of them. So what about the country?
 
I can't help but think that another Bin Laden tape is about to show up. I no longer think that I'm paranoid.:cool:
Biker
 
Administration isn't going to implode. <Personal attack, albeit mild, removed by Art.>
 
ArmedBear said:
Here's the problem. The significant voices of the Democratic Party have no interest in resuscitating your civil liberties. They are authoritarians.
Click to expand...

Obviously, the Republicans don't either. Damned if ye do.....

Do the names Feinstein, Kennedy, Clinton or Kerry make you think "Yay, Freedom!"? If so, you must not read much.
Click to expand...

Yea, and the names Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc don't exactly inspire feelings of freedom either.

Speaking of reading, have you read about Reid and Abramoff? Same corruption, different letter by his name on CNN.

The problem with Bush Derangement Syndrome is that it leads people to think only of their knee-jerk hatred for GW Bush, without giving any thought to the real alternative.
Click to expand...

....I highly doubt the republicans here whom have voted for Bush and found out that he sucked are suffering from your version of BDS. Instead, I'd imagine they're feeling pretty betrayed at this point.
Or did we forget things like the Patriot act, which he supported, the wiretapping, or even his promise to renew the AWB?

News flash: the Libertarian Party has a snowflake's chance in hell of getting a single Congressman in office.
Click to expand...

So, basically, we should vote for the party that really *shouldn't* be screwing us, as opposed to the one we KNOW will screw us ahead of time, nevermind the one party that doesn't wanna screw us over. Gotcha.

The next party in power will either be the R's or D's. Be careful what you wish for.
Click to expand...

At the rate it's going, there's not gonna be much of a difference between the 2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top