Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gun controversy - EMAIL THIS ANTI-GUN SCUMBAG

Discussion in 'Legal' started by shooterx10, Jul 18, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. shooterx10

    shooterx10 Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    159
    GEORGE CARL | Outdoors

    Thursday, July 17, 2003

    If you want to get into a spirited debate in this country today, address the topic of guns. This is definitely a controversial issue with no easy solution. Let's face it; guns kill. People who don't own a gun fear them. We have seen too many movies that glorify killing with guns. Death by shooting provides for a lasting memory, and if we have had the experience of losing a loved one or a friend by the use of a gun, it is a haunting and terrible memory. A gun becomes an evil weapon. :what:

    But let's take a look at the cause for the use of that weapon. There is an inherent desire on the parts of many men to hunt and gather. Watch young boys when they get together. They often play pretend shooting games. I am a hunter, yet I, too, fear guns when they are in the hands of people I do not know. Hunters or sport shooters have probably been trained in firearm safety. Trained and licensed hunters are responsible for very few gun-related accidents in California. Unfortunately, we have more guns in the hands of the wrong people.

    Drugs and/or alcohol and guns don't mix. Those of us who hunt or enjoy shooting sports are always made to feel guilty because we own a gun. We are a minority, and every time a handgun is used in a crime against our fellow man, I feel for all law-abiding citizens. Would registering handguns be a bad thing? Maybe it is time to compromise on that issue and try to ease the tension between gun owners and non-gun owners, but will that help? I don't know. Hunters are afraid that once their guns are registered, their personal freedom will be invaded because all guns will need to be registered. Some gun owners also cite the Bill of Rights and the right to "bear arms."

    Let's look at some statistics. California is the most liberal state in the country. We have relatively few hunters but many people with guns. For every gun owner who has registered his or her gun as a law-abiding person, there are nine others who own guns that are not registered. It is hard to be a caring, conservation-minded sport shooter or hunter and know that others are using guns to kill people.

    Can we compare drunk drivers to people with guns? Yes, cars don't kill people. Instead, crazy, distraught, drunk, drugged, or dangerous people kill others. People who have a bad driving record should not be on the road. Drug-related and alcohol-related driving kills people. How do we stop that? All who drink fear the DUI arrests. I think we might make those offenses even stronger. Drunk drivers kill people the same way that people with guns do. This is a fact.

    But just who is the person who would kill someone else? We, as a society, have become more violent. We have less patience. I watch people in a crowd or on the road. They are often angry or in a frenzied rush. The problem may also stem from a person's upbringing. There are fewer family values today, and crazy, distraught, and drugged people are among us. At any time someone may run into me while I'm driving. At any time someone may be crazy enough to try to break into my house and harm my loved ones or me. It's a fact that even when prohibition was law, a person could still buy a drink just about anywhere. Drugs are illegal, but can drugs be found just about anywhere in America today? You bet they can. I believe that if all guns were illegal, a person would still be able to buy a gun just about anywhere on the black market. The problem is not the guns themselves, but some of the people who use them. This is why it is such a tough problem to solve.

    Again, I fear guns in the hands of people I don't know. I must admit, that I feel safer when I'm in the company of my hunting and fishing buddies. Also, all of my kids have been educated in safety of firearms, and only one chooses to actively hunt. Today, if a person wishes to hunt, he or she must pass a safety course prior to receiving a license. I feel that course should be even harder and longer. Today, if a law-abiding citizen wants to buy a gun, he or she must purchase the gun and wait five days before picking it up to allow for a criminal check to take place. I feel even more can be done. For example, when a gun is purchased, it might be automatically registered with the state.

    We should also return to family values. We need to spend time with our kids. Take them camping, fishing, and hunting. Let's allow them to enjoy nature and the outdoors instead of violent video games. Fewer kids involved in family fun outings get into trouble; that's a fact. Guns are a part of America, but guns in the wrong hands have created a horrible reputation in this country. I sympathize with those who advocate a policy for no guns or gun control, but how can we take guns away from the "wrong people," any more than how do we apprehend a crazed or drunk driver before he or she kills someone? I feel it should be harder to obtain guns and harder to get a license to drive. We have tough DUI laws, but make them tougher. We have tough laws regarding the use of a firearm in a crime, but we should also make those laws tougher. The administration of a nation of violence needs to create firmer policies so that we are not threatened by irresponsible members of society.

    This anti-gun scum's email is not listed, but you can let his employer know: napaopinion@napanews.com :cuss:

    Here is the link.
     
  2. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    What a ramble! :scrutiny:
     
  3. BenW

    BenW Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,116
    Location:
    CA
    Another case of a reporter lacking in basic research skills. This dufus wrote the article in California, where the wait is twice as long and we ALREADY register with the state. And yet he's complaining about bad people with guns. He's unwittingly made the argument that passing more laws against the law abiding does nothing.
     
  4. bjengs

    bjengs Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Messages:
    176
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Nearly every hunter (meaning someone who only uses guns for hunting) I know says crap like this. It's beyond the arrogance of anti-gunners, who say "I don't trust anyone with guns." These guys think "I trust only myself with guns, and frankly I sympathize more with anti-gunners than with people who would shoot for personal enjoyment."

    These jerks will sell us out in a heartbeat and the anti's know it. That's why they don't need outright bans and can word everything to be hunter friendly. Then, maybe a decade from now, they'll learn the lessons of WW2: "When they came for the recreational shooters, I said nothing..."
     
  5. rrader

    rrader member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    234
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Astonishingly poor research by a so-called reporter. Violent crime rates in the US are at a 30 year low.

    Hoplophobia and paranoia are a poor basis on which to pass laws.
     
  6. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    If not for lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, and fake facts, lefitst extremists would have nothing to say.
     
  7. seeker_two

    seeker_two Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,616
    Location:
    Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
    So he can divine that CARS don't kill people, but he can't do the same with GUNS?...:scrutiny:

    Maybe he can...:confused:

    And WHY is that?...:scrutiny:

    What about the guns in the RIGHT hands (LEO's, citizens defending themselves, our military)?...:fire:

    Like you said, laws don't work...

    Blithering hypocritical IDIOT...

    :barf:
     
  8. vmi93

    vmi93 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    163
    Location:
    VA
    Summary

    "I hunt, but I need to be accepted at NYC cocktail parties and in University staffrooms." "Therefore I must repudiate all other beliefs that might make me appear to be an adult human being with a spine or with control over my emotions."
     
  9. Don Gwinn

    Don Gwinn Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,385
    Location:
    Virden, IL
    He gets PAID to write that column? I've seen better from 8th graders (and those of you who know I taught 8th grade English know I'm not kidding.)
     
  10. Orthonym

    Orthonym Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,354
    Location:
    Southern Florida
    Uhh,... this IS the HIGH road, right?

    Chill out, guys! This thread started out wrong and got worse! I'm writing about the title of the first post!:fire: "scumbag" is cop-and-other-criminal slang for a used condom! I'm surprised Oleg and the mods allow its use here!
     
  11. joebogey

    joebogey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    482
    Location:
    KY
    And that boys and girls, is your word for the day. :rolleyes:
     
  12. joebogey

    joebogey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    482
    Location:
    KY
    I'll have to agree with you "runt".

    And to think all these years, I've been calling people such a nasty name.

    Guess we're gonna have to enlist the services of a younger group of moderators to keep us "pc".
     
  13. Betty

    Betty Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    933
    Location:
    Nashville, TN, USA
    Sorry, joebogey -
    That comment (now deleted) was made by Oleg Volk. We're on the same computer and he forgot that I use Netscape and he uses IE to surf THR. So he posted as me.
     
  14. joebogey

    joebogey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    482
    Location:
    KY
    That will be 3 minutes in the "Time Out" chair for Mr. Volk! :D
     
  15. PileDriver

    PileDriver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2003
    Messages:
    45






    tell that to your wife when you're standing there sucking your thumb while she's being raped.
     
  16. Malone LaVeigh

    Malone LaVeigh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,136
    Location:
    Washed out of Four-dollar Bayou. Now I'm... somewh
    The article was a disorganized, rambling mess. It was a pain to try to follow it.

    However, the author is not an "anti-gun" anything. He's a gun owner who happens to be open to a few of the more moderate anti-gun arguments. IOW, somewhat of a fence-sitter. Just the sort of person we ought to be working to bring over to our side. After all, he's already more than half way there.

    His next column will no doubt feature some of the more choice comments made by those stupid enough to follow the original poster's command. You people give the rest of us a bad name.
     
  17. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,906
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    my brother in law was shot dead in NYC

    HE fought back as best he could. Yet this guy thinks he speaks for me when he says
    ...
    I say WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!
    A gun is a tool that can be used to save your life,a tool denied my brother in law James W W----n in november of 1980 in the Bronx NY.
    Sacrilegious "guncontrol" insured that my brother in law had no tool to fight back "guncontrol" insured that the criminal had a tool to kill an innocent father of a one month old child.
    GUN CONTROL IS THE EVIL WEAPON THAT INSURES THUGS CAN KILL THEIR UNARMED VICTIMS :fire:
    I say NO to all gun control.
     
  18. Monte Harrison

    Monte Harrison Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Messages:
    253
    Location:
    Arkansas
    An old Joan Jett and the Blackhearts tune comes to mind: "I don't give a damn about my reputation...!"
     
  19. Partisan Ranger

    Partisan Ranger Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    672
    Location:
    Virginia
    Would registering handguns be a bad thing? Maybe it is time to compromise on that issue and try to ease the tension between gun owners and non-gun owners, but will that help? I don't know.
    ----------------------------------------------------

    Yeah right. If we cave and allow our guns to be registered, I have no doubt that the anti-gun extremist bigot parasites will just leave us alone.

    :barf: :barf: :barf: :barf: :barf:

    If you really think that these maggots will walk off fat and happy after our guns are registered, you are lacking in intellectual horsepower.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page