Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gun owners: the new apartheid

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Bubba613, Dec 25, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bubba613

    Bubba613 member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,953
  2. berettaprofessor

    berettaprofessor Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,897
    Location:
    Kansas
    The sad part about thoughts like this (dumping gun company stocks) is that once the company has sold stock through an offering, it really doesn't care what the current price is...the money has been raised and spent. The stockholders care, and have representatives on the board of directors, but the only people making money are the stockholders and the only people hurt if the stock crashes are the stockholders. The company doesn't care unless it owns it's own stock.
     
  3. Surculus

    Surculus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    145
    Location:
    Lo-cal So.Cal. where the money is plastic & the pe
    Not entirely true. There are listing requirements to meet, so for instance, if the share price never rises above $10/share in (I forget how many weeks), the stock will get de-listed from the NYSE. So within certain parameters, the company does care about the stock price. That said, when all the progressive funds started selling their shares of Big Tobacco, it just made it feasible for bottom traders like me, who despise the product but realize people don't change, to buy in & benefit from other peoples offensive habits. :D
     
  4. P5 Guy

    P5 Guy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,695
    Location:
    Tampa Bay area
    I wonder what the ratio of gun sales is, Commercial/Civilian Sales to Sales to Government Agencies? Did the past five years skew the ratio? Are the fund buyers willing to (no pun) shoot their investors in the foot over this?
     
  5. wojownik

    wojownik Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,872
    Um, if such a thing were done, as an orchestrated effort, could that not be seen as a violation of the Security Exchange Act (section 9(a)(3) under "PROHIBITION AGAINST MANIPULATION OF SECURITY PRICES". :scrutiny:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page