Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gun Range Bans Department Of Justice In Response To Legislative Proposals

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Desertdog, Jun 17, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    Contact: Chuck Michel, CRPA Media Spokesman (562) 216-4444


    GUN RANGE BANS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    FROM USING FACILITIES IN RESPONSE TO
    LOCKYER’S LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS
    http://www.crpa.org/showpages.asp?pid=1167

    Range’s Move Reflects a Growing Trend In The Industry

    Reflecting the latest response to ill conceived legislative proposals from within the gun industry, a Sacramento shooting range banned the use of its shooting facilities by employees of the California Department of Justice because Attorney General Lockyer has misrepresented the truth in sponsoring two bills in the State legislature that the club, and other civil rights groups including CRPA, opposes.

    Club President Thomas Hause wrote to Lockyer that the organization "is concerned that your staff will further your efforts regarding AB 352 and SB 357 while using our facility." The Folsom club has roughly 1,000 members and its range sits on more than 880 acres. A copy of the letter is posted at:
    http://www.sacvalley.org/SacVal/Lttr_to_DOJ.html

    On bill, (AB 352) by Assemblyman Koretz (who has previously stated he advocates banning civilian handgun possession) would require handguns to include a device that stamps a specific number on cartridge cases that are fired by that handgun. The other bill (SB 357), authored by Lockyer and carried by Senator Dunn (D- Santa Ana) would require that ammunition manufacturers mark bullets with a serial number for potential tracking. The state Assembly passed AB 352. The same day the state senate passed SB 357. A day later, the State Senate passed SB 357. AB 352 is now in the State Senate and SB 357 is now in the Assembly.

    Both bills are impractical and constitute an enormous invasion of privacy - effectively creating a gun owner database in a state where registration has already lead to confiscation. The bills have the support of the California DOJ, but no other California law enforcement organizations support the measures.

    The club's stand has received support from other gun owners throughout the state. It follows a similar stand taken by Ronnie Barret, owner of Barrett Firearms, over proposals to ban .50 caliber single shot bolt action rifles. In 2003 Barrett refused to do further business with the LAPD because of misrepresentations made by the Department while advocating for a ban on the rifles. A copy of the Barrett letter to the LAPD is posted at: http://nramemberscouncils.com/caspecial/la50banbarrett.shtml

    Chuck Michel, attorney for the CRPA said the clubs’ move reflects an increasing trend. “As gun bans become more and more extreme, ever larger segments of the firearms industry are responding by cutting off the supply to government agencies. We all support rank and file law enforcement, but some of their leaders are out of control. In fact,” Michel added, “the major ammunition manufactures are warning that if SB 357 is passed, they will abandon the California market.”

    An industry representative confirmed that: "We continue to be strongly opposed to the legislation because it amounts to a de facto ammunition ban in California," said Lawrence G. Keane, general counsel for the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute. "Manufacturers cannot comply with requirements of the bill unless new factories are built. And they simply don't have the ability to build new factories for California, so they will have to abandon the market."
     
  2. Pilgrim

    Pilgrim Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Nevada, escaped from the PDRK via Idaho.
    I sincerely hope this is true and not a bluff.

    Pilgrim
     
  3. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Maybe the gun companies will get smart, come together and stop selling to the police. Let them defend the politicians with sticks and rocks!
     
  4. Yanus

    Yanus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    216
    Location:
    Central TX
    The DOJ won't have to worry about a source for PC ammo. I'm sure NORINCO, completely owned by the PRA, will be more than happy to supply their "comrades" with ammo......... :rolleyes:

    Yanus
     
  5. duckslayer

    duckslayer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Messages:
    495
    Location:
    NC
    I'm going to go buy some factory ammo just to help them out! If they abandon the California market completely, they have to somehow not sell to the LE agencies in order for their boycott to work. If the LEA's just order ammo (not marked as I am sure they will be exempt anyway:() from a distributer the plan won't work. Perhaps the ammo companies can strongarm the distributers into not selling to Cali LEAs, but I doubt it.

    Besides, someone would care more about immediate money than principle and set up shop to sell there and then they would have a niche market and no competition.
     
  6. woerm

    woerm Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    390
    Location:
    Glitter Gulch, LSR
    Yanus

    I know that Norinco guns can't be imported now.

    I don't recall if their ammo was covered by the same ban.

    8-P

    snicker snicker,

    that would be soooo ironic.

    r

    well that would go w/ kailifornica's usual level or moronic.
    :neener:
     
  7. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    After thay run out of ammo, let's see if Dillon refuses to sell them presses!
     
  8. Don of Kalifornia

    Don of Kalifornia Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    115
    Location:
    AZ
    One part of SB 357, is that law enforcement is NOT EXEMPT from have ammo serialized. Soon if this passes..LEO may no get any ammo either.

    Also all pistol bullets for reloading must have serial numbers too.
     
  9. Crosshair

    Crosshair Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,985
    Location:
    Grand Forks, North Dakota
    Can't wait until one of these idiot politicians gets their clock cleaned by somebody. Then wonder why their bodygaurds didn't do anything. :evil:
     
  10. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    The People's Republic of California Department of so-called "Justice" is playing politics with tax dollars. That's one of the many reasons I left the P.R.C. in 2002 to return to the United States.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page