Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gun Rights

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by sprice, Feb 26, 2011.

?

Human right or Civil right?

Poll closed Mar 28, 2011.
  1. Human

    64 vote(s)
    77.1%
  2. Civil

    19 vote(s)
    22.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sprice

    sprice Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2008
    Messages:
    916
    I was having a conversation with a fellow member the other day and he brought up an interesting point.

    Is the right of arms (firearms) a civil right or a human right?

    Human right- rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled. God given.
    Civil right- protected by the government for individuals' freedom from unwarranted infringement by governments and private organizations. Given by the government for citizens of that state/country only.
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2011
  2. david58

    david58 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    301
    Location:
    High Country New Mexico
    Please exlpain the definitions you employ.
     
  3. Sky

    Sky Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    2,927
    Location:
    Texas
    Hummm Human right is to defend ones self and property.

    Civil right granted by the founding fathers in the 2a.
     
  4. Manco

    Manco Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    I'm not sure how to answer. In that self-defense is a natural right that existed long before civilization (and will exist long after civilization collapses ;)) and exists independently of it, I guess it's a human right as well. Since guns are the most effective means of self-defense, then it follows that gun rights are human rights, at least in my view. If in a civil society, as most of us understand it, there are egalitarian principles such as equal protection under the law, then it stands to reason that guns, being the great equalizers that they are, would be an essential part of ensuring equality. In this case it takes us away from certain aspects of nature (e.g. superior physical strength allowing one person to dominate or kill another at will) while reinforcing other more fundamental aspects (the right to defend oneself and the freedom to live), which I think is the very basis of civil society. Therefore gun rights are also civil rights.

    This civil right is enumerated and protected by the Second Amendment, but not granted by it--none of our rights are granted by the government (which can only either defend or take them away), and we have other rights that are not enumerated.
     
  5. mcdonl

    mcdonl Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,228
    Location:
    Southern Maine
    Civil - Civilization - Lack of either and you do not need to worry about RKBA.....
     
  6. DoubleTapDrew

    DoubleTapDrew Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,356
    Location:
    Oregon
    +1. "Shall not be infringed". It's a restriction on the government, nothing more. We are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights.
     
  7. gordy

    gordy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    509
    Location:
    south central Minnesota
    I believe that God has given me the right to protect my self and family.
    That could be with a sharpened stick or a firearm.
    Man has taken the rights away from some individuals who have shown the lack of common sense and the ability to act the way man has made his own laws.
     
  8. NMGonzo

    NMGonzo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,691
    Location:
    Albuquerque & Santa Fe
    Human Right.

    Because there would be no civility without arms the right to arm one-self.
     
  9. Caliper_Mi

    Caliper_Mi Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,617
    Location:
    Michigan
    :scrutiny: If civilization collapses, you'd better have some way to protect yourself.

    RKBA is certainly a Human right. The right to defend your person, your property, your territory.
     
  10. Sky

    Sky Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    2,927
    Location:
    Texas
    No argument here.
     
  11. Nushif

    Nushif Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,082
    Location:
    Corvallis, OR
    I'd call it a human right, to be honest.

    Because at its core it's not about firearms, it's about self defense.
     
  12. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18,302
    Location:
    Ft. Worth
    Human rights seem to be things that are an innate part of being human.

    "Civil" rights seem to be things that are guaranteed to a person by civil society. I disagree that civil rights are necessarily "given", more like they are codified in some manner.

    So we seem to have in the Second Amendment a bit of both. The right to protect one's own life pre-existed the Constitution, making it a human right, the Second specifically protects it, making it a civil right in our society.

    My opinion anyway.
     
  13. sprice

    sprice Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2008
    Messages:
    916
    I like what you had to say texasrifleman. I agree with that but it's sometimes hard for me to put my ideas into words.
     
  14. Millwright

    Millwright Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Messages:
    396
    Location:
    New Jersey
    In our "Western/Christian" legal system the right of self-defense dates back to the OT biblical era. More recently, (and for our legal purposes), English Common Law deemed that right just. Writings of prized jurists like Blackstone emphasized it. Our Founding Fathers - after much public writings and debate in their local governing bodies - incorporated it into our organizing documents. Until the latter half of the 20th century it was "part and parcel" of most of our common law.

    Only with the advent of the "nanny government poloice state" have we been denied the right of active self-defense or defense of family by some states' governing bodies. >MW
     
  15. danprkr

    danprkr Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,337
    To me it's a human right in that every human in the world will instinctively fight to stay alive if necessary. With that in mind denying someone the ability to do so to the best level possible is taking a basic human right.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page