Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Guns as an art material

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by iapetus, Jan 1, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. iapetus

    iapetus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    614
    Location:
    UK
    These sculptures were on display in the British Museum in London when I was living there a few months ago (only got them developed the other day). All made for old gun parts (mainly AK47s).
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Third_Rail

    Third_Rail Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    Ruined parts that can't be saved, using them like that? That's fine.

    Ruining parts to use them for that? That's not fine.


    Interesting art, though not to my taste.
     
  3. VirgilCaine

    VirgilCaine Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    617
    Bleaugh. Abstract crap. I'm a realist to the core.
     
  4. nfl1990

    nfl1990 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    385
    That's sick and perverse. Would you use body parts that way?
     
  5. GunnySkox

    GunnySkox Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,129
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Doesn't look very abstract to me, honestly. That third one is pretty clearly a gunmonkey climbing a guntree, there's a magturtle (with dustcover eyes!) in one, and the first one is clearly a falcon descending on some..thing.

    Additionally, I don't see that it's perverse, either. It's freaking metal. METAL. Just because a Russian in a factory somewhere yanked a lever and a big machine squished it into the shape of a useful part of a device doesn't make it sacred. I could go chop up my old computer crap upstairs (which is still perfectly useful, just old, and cost a damn sight more than my guns when I first got it) and glue it together in an astonishing facsimile of a big motherboardgle descending on a harddrivecupine and y'all wouldn't give half a crap.

    Badgers aren't bishops, anthills aren't mountains, and a sculpture is just a freaking sculpture. You're free to not like it. Heck, you're free to find it "perverse", but I think the medium is a silly reason to hate a sculpture.

    ~GnSx
     
  6. nfl1990

    nfl1990 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    385
    I was just kidding.
     
  7. GunnySkox

    GunnySkox Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,129
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    *cough* Er, yes, uhm, of course. I was, too. I totally didn't get all worked up and bitchy because of that, not at all. *ahem, cough* I'ma.. go.. place.

    You can't prove a thing! Lies! Lies and slander!

    :eek:
    ~GnSx
    And libel!
     
  8. Taurus 66

    Taurus 66 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,485
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    This passes for art? :barf: I must not have any culture.
     
  9. AF_INT1N0

    AF_INT1N0 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    484
    I gotta admit they make an interesting sculpture.

    Untill you realize that those guns used to protect the Brits. :uhoh:

    Now, as Oleg would say they must settle for extra vaseline (and interesting art).:(

    "Hey!! Stop robbing her, or I'll create interesting sculptures!!!"
     
  10. nfl1990

    nfl1990 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    385
    It would actually only be libel.
     
  11. Preacherman

    Preacherman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,309
    Location:
    Louisiana, USA
    Now, if only some of those magazines still contained live rounds, and we could apply a welding torch at the right spot...

    :evil: :D
     
  12. cosine

    cosine Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Messages:
    573
    Location:
    Suburb of Milwaukee, WI
    I think that the tortoise made out of the mags is kinda cool.

    At least that art is better than the U.N. sculpture of a revolver with its barrel twisted into a knot.
     
  13. Sinsaba

    Sinsaba Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2005
    Messages:
    585
    Location:
    Northern VA
    I would be interested in what the museum posted about the exibit. I know I'm jumping to conclusions but I wouldn't be at all surprised it it wasn't an anti-gun exibit.
     
  14. iapetus

    iapetus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    614
    Location:
    UK

    Unfortunately you're right - there is a "getting rid of dangerous weapons" motivation behind it, and they were made from decomissioned weapons.

    On the other hand, all the weapons were exchanged for tools, rather than confiscated, and if someone decides that they need something else more than their gun, I guess that's their choice. (And they may well have been smart enough to only trade in their nonworking guns). There's more about the project here:

    Link

    I did think they looked quite cool though, and justified liking them on the grounds that if the artist had instead declared "I like guns, and when I found a load rusting away beyond the point of use, I though't I'd turn them into something neat" I would have approved, so its the artist that's objectionable, not the art. After all, its not the object thats the problem, just what its used for. And if you refused to appreciate art on the grounds that you disagreed with the artist's politics or opinions, then that would rule out an awful lot of art (e.g. Wagner).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page