HD gun for older woman

Status
Not open for further replies.

HSBB

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
32
Location
Suburban DC
Been shopping around for a handgun for my mother-in-law.

Here's the scenario: Single woman in her late 60s looking for a gun primarily to protect an isolated vacation home. I feel safe to say that she is not interested in CCW.

More than likely she will not train with it either. It will sit around and primarily function as a talisman, making her feel safer. (I know, FAR from ideal...)

She has little or no experience shooting, but long ago when her husband was alive there was a snubby in the house. It's now long gone.

She will not want to spend a lot.

Given these parameters, I'm thinking a 4" .38, most likely a LEO trade-in K frame (eg. Models 10/15/64) or Service Six.

Thoughts?
 
Yep, those pistols you listed would be perfect.

357 Magnum would be just fine too. Can always shoot 38 +P out of it.

Take her shooting and let her decide.
 
I would second the K-frame. A 357 might have a bit too much kick and be a bit intimidating for her.
 
A used 327 mag would fit the bill.

Thanks, but I agree with paradox998. I'm thinking .327/.357 would have way too much giddyup for her!

From http://www.gunsandammo.com/content/ruger-sp101327-magnum?page=2
Now, there will be some who will use their experience with earlier .32s and declare it "a fine round for the ladies and for new shooters." Excuse me, but weren't you paying attention to the "115 at 1,316" part? The SP101 kicks, and it kicks pretty briskly. The .327 Federal Magnum, with the factory full-power loads, is not a ladies' or beginner's load. You want the performance, you have to pay the price. If you want more than the .327 delivers, you have to go to the .357 Magnum, and having done so you will pay mightily for it. An SP101 in .357 delivers a 125-grain JHP at more than 1,300 fps, but you get only five shots and muzzle blast and recoil that could make a brass monkey flinch.
 
Uh, you guys do realize that 38 special works quite nicely in a 357 Magnum gun?

I do. The only advantage I see in buying a .357 to shoot .38 is if the gun is substantially heavier, thereby absorbing more recoil. The LEO guns all have the heavy barrel and, more importantly, come in around $275. All things considered, I'm not convinced it's worth it going to the .357.
 
Yes, but there are nice S&W 38 specials on the market used, that would be fine for her purposes. I have a k frame 38 spl, and it is my favorite revolver. Old, beat-up, but accurate, and reliable.
 
Actually, come to think of it, if she's never going to carry it, and it's just for HD, might a shotgun be a better alternative? Can be had for cheaper than the revolver, less paperwork when buying, easier to point/aim for someone who is not going to train much, more stopping power, and if she is the type who is going to hole up in the bedroom in the event of a "bump in the night" the maneuverability of a handgun is really no advantage at all.
 
Rule #1: Let her shoot it and choose it.

That being said, my wife, who is well on

The North side of sixty, purely shoots the piss

Out of a CZ P-01 loaded with 124gr JHP's.

Its why I had to get a second one..........


isher
 
I'm thinking a low-power rifle. A plinking gun.

If she's worried about an odd sound or a bump in the night, it's going to let her fire .22LR easy and will dissuade varmints of many varieties, including the 2-legged kind. The size and heft should reassure her, while taming the caliber and not being too much. It should look like business. Maybe the Henry Repeater?

Remember, most of us are looking for a solution that will pick someone up and throw 'em away. I don't think that's the need here.
 
Actually, come to think of it, if she's never going to carry it, and it's just for HD, might a shotgun be a better alternative? Can be had for cheaper than the revolver, less paperwork when buying, easier to point/aim for someone who is not going to train much, more stopping power, and if she is the type who is going to hole up in the bedroom in the event of a "bump in the night" the maneuverability of a handgun is really no advantage at all.
Good thoughts, Ben, but I'm pretty sure she'd be much more intimidated by a long gun. I need to ask her.

I guess I'm in Kathy Jackson's camp on this one! :D
http://www.corneredcat.com/FirstGun/handgun.aspx
 
Given these parameters, I'm thinking a 4" .38, most likely a LEO trade-in K frame (eg. Models 10/15/64) or Service Six.
That's exactly what I would recommend.

Something with adjustable sights is good because you can help her zero it for the ammunition she's using. For a beginner, different points of aim and impact can be very frustrating.
 
Shockwave may be on to something. Something like a Ruger 10/22 might even be good. Think about it. She can just pull the trigger and let the rifle do the rest. Doesn't need to do any manipulations at all.

I can see what you mean about a handgun being less intimidating which is why I had suggested it initially. Either way, I think she's lucky to have you helping her out.
 
Hand strength could be an issue. A decent used .38 K-Frame is an OK idea but they are heavy. A square-butt-gripped J-frame might be better. A .32 might be even better than that.

A removeable mag 16" .22 semi-auto -- not the worst idea. I got an ex-girlfriend, "an older woman" LOL, the best Valentine's Day gift ever -- a-harder-to-find OEM nickel 10-rnd. mag for her semi-auto "black" Marlin .22. Now she's got two, a coupla boxes of High Velocity ammo, and she's ready to defend the homestead all by herself.

Al
 
Good thoughts, Ben, but I'm pretty sure she'd be much more intimidated by a long gun. I need to ask her.

In my experience people are less intimated by long guns than they are handguns. Shotguns are good but pistol caliber carbines are another option. Hardly any recoil and much easier to aim.
 
More than likely she will not train with it either. It will sit around and primarily function as a talisman, making her feel safer. (I know, FAR from ideal...)

She has little or no experience shooting

A .22 LR revolver.
 
I disagree w/a .22 LR revolver. A revolver is better'n a semi-auto pistol. But if she can shoot a revolver don't bother w/a .22. They are better'n nuthin' but too weak. Get at LEAST a .32 (i.e. a J-Frame sized 6-shot) which is generally consdered to be the smallest caliber acceptable to stop an attacker. At least the .22 LR from a RIFLE is about the same power as a .32. And quieter!
Al
 
Last edited:
Just suggested a .22 revolver because grandma will probably never practice with or even touch the gun. Whatever she gets, it's gonna sit in a drawer for years without being touched or maintained. Which is why I'd prefer a revolver. Simple and easy to use. Simply point and pull the trigger, no safety to worry about. The .22LR is a very small caliber, but it will actually hurt someone. And grandma might actually hit what she's aiming at if she ever has to use it. JMHO.

Edited to add: you guys are actually advocating a shotgun for someone who doesn't shoot guns, and who is never going to practice with the gun? All that recoil and noise are gonna make her flinch like crazy if she ever has to use it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top