Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Help choosing a spotting scope

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by dnmccoy, Feb 4, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dnmccoy

    dnmccoy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Messages:
    107
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    Hey all,Im looking for a budget minded (under $200) to get me started in NRA highpower and CMP matches. Most (98%) shooting will be from 300yrds and in. I was looking at a Barska Blackhawk if anyone can speak for it or throw me some ideas
     
  2. dnmccoy

    dnmccoy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Messages:
    107
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    Hey all,Im looking for a budget minded (under $200) to get me started in NRA highpower and CMP matches. Most (98%) shooting will be from 300yrds and in. I was looking at a Barska Blackhawk if anyone can speak for it or throw me some ideas
     
  3. EddieNFL

    EddieNFL member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,329
    A little over your budget, but Jim Ownes speaks very well of the Konous.
    http://jarheadtop.com/KONUS.htm

    If you stick with HP you will eventually ditch the Barska.
     
  4. jpwilly

    jpwilly Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,892
    Location:
    Phoenix AZ
  5. alemonkey

    alemonkey Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,678
    Location:
    Lincoln, NE
    Barska is absolute junk. Stay away from it.

    The Konus is the best spotter for the money, IMO. If you watch the sales at Optics Planet you'll sometimes see it for close to $200.
     
  6. Canuck-IL

    Canuck-IL Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,590
    Konus and Zhumell are the only 2 to consider before you step up to a Kowa. Of the 2, I think the Zhumell is a little better glass and slightly more robust construction. Either can be found for $199 - 209 if you watch for sales.

    Midway and Optics Planet have the Konus on sale from time to time and the link below has the Zhumell.
    http://www.spottingscopes.com/spott...tting-scopes/2060x80mmangledspottingscope.cfm

    /Bryan

    ETA: I've not seen the Barska spotter but from what I have seen of their other products, they're not likely worth whatever they charge.
     
  7. dnmccoy

    dnmccoy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Messages:
    107
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    I have heard of the Konus but not the Zhumell , I'll Hafta check into it
     
  8. ms6852

    ms6852 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,531
    Location:
    TEXAS
    DNMCCOY before you blow away $200 dollars I would recommend you read this article. The prices are a little different now since the article is a few years old but the wisdom behind the article is always timeless. If I were you I would save a little more. Be patient, and make a onetime purchase instead of 2 or 3 times because your first purchase did not deliver to your expectations. Here is the link, and good luck on your purchase.

    http://www.opticsplanet.net/spotting-scopes-for-target-shooting.html
     
  9. SGW42

    SGW42 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Houston!
    Harbor Freight sells a 20-60x60 for $60 (on sale now it seems for $50).

    I picked one up. The included tripod is flimsy, so I just use a small camera one that kept it close to the bench. Clarity is nothing spectacular but I can easily see .223 holes at 100 yards and probably beyond. I used it for about a year and never had a problem.
     
  10. finnwolf64

    finnwolf64 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    61
    Location:
    Down Under
    Redfield make a 20-60x60mm spotting scope for around $200. These were out of stock when I purchased a spotting scope 6 months ago, so I went with the Bushnell 20-60x65mm for about the same price. You can see .17 caliber holes at 200 yards with the Bushnell. I've since had a look through a Redfield spotting scope & in my opinion the Redfield has a slightly crisper image.
     
  11. P-32

    P-32 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,050
    Location:
    the dry side of Washington St
    http://jarheadtop.com/KONUS.htm

    I think this is a good deal.

    The spotting scope is an important piece of your gear. I would get the best you can. Most shooters use a 27X as anything much bigger diminishes the ability to read conditions. Reading conditions is really what the scope is used for. The other things the spotting scope does is just a benefit but I will admit a spotting scope makes it easier to see sighters and scoring disks. Reading the chaulk board too.

    I would let the older shooters know you are on the prowl for a scope. Maybe one of them will step up and let you borrow an old scope until you can get your own. Any HP shooter worth his salt will help when he or she can and be cheerful about it at least until you start beating them.

    The scope stand is also important and one really needs to look past the first scope to make sure it will fit the new scope when that happens. One inch rods with three feet on the ground seem to be the standard. It’s not fun when your brand new $1k scope tips over because of the combo of a cheap scope stand and wind.
     
  12. agshooter

    agshooter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    21
    I'd be willing to part with my Redfield Rampage. I am thinking of upgrading.

    PM me if interested
     
  13. UcanRun

    UcanRun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2011
    Messages:
    52
  14. 30Cal

    30Cal Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,298
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    22-25x is about ideal. It's biggest use is in watching conditions, not spotting holes. An angled long eye relief eyepiece is ideal
     
  15. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    If you can put off the purchase and save a little longer, you will be happier in the long run. You get what you pay for in optics. Buy once, cry once.

    If you cannot exceed that budget, do some research on a birdwatching forum on what is good in that price range. Birdwatchers know more about what makes a good spotting scope than any of us. They're the ones who look through them 10 hours a day. We just occasionally glance after a string of shots.
     
  16. SwampWolf

    SwampWolf Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,997
    Location:
    North Central Ohio
    This is good advice. My pick for a "reasonably" priced spotting scope was the Leupold "Sequoia" 20-60x80mm model with the angled eyepiece ($336.45 from www.sinclairintl.com). When it came to choosing a quality scope stand , there are several viable options, including Creedmore, Freeland, Saturn, Schneller, First Strike, Giraud, Ewing, and Ray-Vin. After examining features, quality of construction/materials and price I opted for the First Strike unit-and have not been disappointed.
     
  17. gamestalker

    gamestalker member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    9,832
    Location:
    SW Arizona
    Barska is total garbage! If you want a spotting scope that will make bullet hole identifiable at 300 yds. your going to need something fairly decent. Leupld has a 15x45 for around $300 that will do quite well.
     
  18. Pat M

    Pat M Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Messages:
    249
    I've been using the Konus 80,Freeland Heavy Duty Stand (1" rod), and the Freeland swivel head. I'm happy with this setup.
     
  19. DanTheFarmer

    DanTheFarmer Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Messages:
    379
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Good Evening,

    I have a Barska scope and it does exactly what I want it to do and does so cheaply. That's the good news.

    I use it at 100 yards as I'm working on various powder/bullet combinations during load development.

    The bad news is that I looked through another, more expensive, scope being used by another shooter at the range one day and the difference was dramatic. The better scope (I think it was a Bushnell) was really a lot better...more clarity and contrast...just easier all around to look through if that makes sense.

    So I have no complaints with my Barska but I wouldn't want to use it at 300 yards. I recommend actually looking through a few scopes. More dollars spent may actually prove to be a bargin.

    Good Luck!

    Dan
     
  20. lonniemike

    lonniemike Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    150
    Even with $1000 glass, spotting little holes at 300yds and further is tough under the best of conditions. On top of that, you probably want to see the shots in the black too, good luck with that.
    For under $200 a birding scope suggested to me was the Celestron Ultima 80. It is excellent and has worked well for a number of years. As was mentioned in eariler posts, do get a good mounting system for what ever scope you get. Old and heavy mounts can be good. I have stand up tripod and table mounts. They are durable.Best
     
  21. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    Once you get past a certain magnification range, even the best glass will start losing contrast and "gray out". However, with good glass, the image quality will always be better compared to mediocre glass so the viewing experience is more enjoyable. It depends how much time you spend behind it. Most people can get by with a generic spotting scope to get the job done. If you're more critical of the sight picture, then the extra money is worth it.

    Again, I suggest checking out birdwatching forums for advice on spotting scopes because the birdwatcher demands accurate picture reproduction.

    For a stand, I use a Giotto 9240 tripod with a pan head. It ends up being cheaper and sturdier than some of the shooting-specific stands and it doubles up as a camera tripod. A pan head allows very precise movement and lockup. I tried the spotter on a Gitzo tripod with a Markins ball head but the ball head didn't have enough precision at magnification. Maybe it's possible for smaller spotters to get away with a ball head. I run an 80mm spotter so maybe it's simply too hefty for that.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page