Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hemming and hawing on an AR Barrel profile.

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by arthurcw, Feb 13, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. arthurcw

    arthurcw Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    939
    Location:
    Houston, TX (a.k.a. Free City of Aztlan)
    I’m looking at an AR build in the near future. It will actually be for the Mrs. Right now, we’re looking at a 16” mid length light weight barrel for the project (CMMG), but we were wondering if we should split the difference and go with a mid length government profile. It’s going to be a range toy mostly, with SHTF applications.

    Will we really gain all that much balance and handling going with the light weight barrel vs. heating and longevity issues?

    Thanks in advance.

    And yes… it’s for HER. She knows about it. It’s not some weird, “Oh look honey! I got you a new table saw for Valentine’s Day,” sort of thing.
     
  2. MMcfpd

    MMcfpd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    808
    Location:
    Houston, TX USA
    I have both profiles, in 16" and 20", and I definitely prefer the lightweights. They do heat up more quickly, but they also cool down faster, and they're easier to handle.

    The differences are not that great, so if you have some other reasons for preferring the gov't. profile, go for that.
     
  3. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    HBAR's are suited for machine guns, sniper rifles, and target rifles, so just avoid those altogether.

    They have no place in an AR15. The AR15 was made to be light and handy. I bought a 20" HBAR with my second AR15. Big mistake that was quickly rectified.

    That said, all of my AR15's are superlight or govt profile. Either will do fine. I built my wife a 16" superlight and it is extremely handy and points very fast. It is amazing how much faster and well balanced the lighter barrels are.

    Superlight-RMT.jpg

    I've taken coyotes with this superlight. I can easily put a couple mags through it in short order without losing a lot in the way of accuracy. It's a defensive carbine. Meant for short engagements, not for prolonged firefights.
     
  4. Ceemack

    Ceemack Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Messages:
    82
    Personally, I have a heavy-contour (not a bull barrel--just a heavy NM-type profile) barrel on my 16", and love the muzzle-forward balance it provides. I wouldn't enjoy the same weapon with a light barrel nearly as much.
     
  5. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,661
    Location:
    Norra Texas
  6. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,661
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    CMMG's lightweights are Da Bomb - I have built three rifles with 'em (two 16" and one 20") and have been very pleased with every one. They are as accurate as anything I have, handle very well, and are of high quality.

    I prefer the lightweight 16" profile over the 16" M4-style Gov't profile both because they are a bit lighter and because I do not need (and find objectionable) the M203 cutout.
     
  7. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    Hrm. You mean I should send that drill press back?

    Mike
     
  8. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    No... but you may want to wrap it with a box of chocolates!! :evil:
     
  9. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    Why not a fluted heavy contour barrel? I think it's lighter than M4 profile, but should be stiffer.
     
  10. Soybomb

    Soybomb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Messages:
    3,959
    CMMG also has a midweight barrel profile that I hear is about the same weight as a government profile but has the weight distributed differently for a little better balance. I just built a light and am eager to see how it shoots, my only concern is that its not floated and may flex more than I like when shot with a sling.
     
  11. arthurcw

    arthurcw Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    939
    Location:
    Houston, TX (a.k.a. Free City of Aztlan)
    Thanks for the info.

    Don't worry. It’s not a gift. But if it was, a box of ammo would be more appropriate than chocolates. Don'cha' think?

    Soybomb: I hadn't considered the flex when shot from a sling? I'll see if CMMG has a "Med Con" in mid length flavor and give that a ponder.

    Armedbear: is that a custom turned barrel or off the shelf somewhere?

    Thanks again.
     
  12. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    ArmedBear, it will be lighter; but not anywhere near lightweight or gov't profile territory. I think fluting might shave about 0.2lbs off an HBAR.

    I have the medium profile CMMG barrel. It was one of the first batch of 1:7 midlength barrels they ever did so I am not sure if it is still a production item. Very nice handling; but I believe the Gov't profile is a bit lighter.

    It seems like the main issue with lighter profile barrels is a shifting point of impact when slung, from a bipod, or with a suppressor. For most work, they seem just as handy as their heavier cousins.
     
  13. bogie

    bogie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,569
    Location:
    St. Louis, in the Don't Show Me state
    Keep in mind that if you every wish to compete with the thing (i.e., CMP/DCM/Whatever they call it this week...), it has to be the right kinda profile/sights, etc...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page