Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hey all

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Zecho, Apr 23, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Zecho

    Zecho Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2
    I have been stalk... err.. lurking for a bit, and now am in a position where I could use some advice.

    I have a Savage .243, Harris bipod, 6-24x50 scope blah blah blah. Around $1200 invested after the custom camo paint job.

    Anywho, I've been looking to trade it for a wheel gun and have had a couple of offers this week and am not sure which way to turn.


    First offer is for a Brand Spankin New Ruger GP100 357 6" barrel, still in the case with all of the stuff that gets stuffed in a box (paperwork, receipts etc.) and the full warranty card.

    Second is a S&W 629 .44 with 8 3/8 barrel, pretty much same cosmetics. Just a little older and without the paperwork.

    Now, if I go to W.Va and hunt bear, I would think I would prefer the 44, but considering I hunt here, in Oh, and for the most part I bow hunt, I would say the 357 would suffice.

    So, the caliber doesn't matter that much to me as I will be using this for HUNTING (not shooting, I got enough of the sport of shooting growing up on a Texas farm). I like to hunt. and carrying around a shotgun full of slugs isn't hunting to me. I'm more interested in something I can climb a tree and wait, or stalk if I feel the urge. And if the occasion arises to go gun hunting bears, I can always pack up the AR and take it (yet I would rather take my bow).

    So, opinions on which is more of a "hunter" I suppose, and which is a better deal I guess are my questions.
     
  2. jbkebert

    jbkebert Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    2,599
    Location:
    Kansas
    The Smith is worth a little bit more than the Ruger. Either one is not worth the price vested in your rifle. I am also a bowhunter and would rather do that than any other form of hunting. I also however handgun hunt and would opt for the .44 over the .357. I use my Smith 29 or Ruger Super Redhawk for deer and hogs. In my personal opinion the .357 is a little light for medium sized game.
     
  3. Zecho

    Zecho Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2
    To be perfectly honest, I'd be much happier if someone would come off of a Blackhawk or a nice Vaquero... But I don't see that happening.
     
  4. calaverasslim

    calaverasslim Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,006
    Location:
    San Antonio de Bejar
    I suspect if your willing to get up off the $1200 price tag a little you may get what you want. In today's economy, that is a chunk o change to put out for a hunting rifle.

    You may find a Blackhawk of the cal of your choice for around 400-450. I would seriously consider the 44 Blackhawk with either the 4.63" or the 5.5" barrel. then you would be set with what your looking for.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page