Hi Point or AK

Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay, time for me to give the Hi-point its props.

It is light, and a joy to shoot. The sights are superior to those of the AK, and it is shorter and "handier." It fires a much cheaper round than the AK and 9mm can be found much more easily than decent priced 7.62x39.

That said, the AK will do everything the hi-point can and at longer range with a higher mag capactiy. I don't like Hi-point bashing (actually, it's okay to bash the pistols) but the AK really does beat it in every category.

The Hi-point owner who's friend has an AK has spoken, and he is jealous of his friend's AK.
 
I guess the real question is, what do you want to use the gun for?

Comparing a pistol-caliber carbine to a intermediate cartridge fullsize rifle is like comparing apples to potatoes. Kind of a silly question.

If you want to go blasting cheap ammo at 100 yards or less get the Hi-point. Despite what hundreds of Innernet parrots squawkingly repeat at the drop of a hat, Hi-Point guns are not as bad as their reputation, and their carbines are even better than that. My only dislike is the styling is too sci-fi and the magazines are 10-round max. Personally I would get a Kel-Tec Sub-Rifle 2000 instead of a Hi-point if I wanted a pistol-caliber carbine because you can use standard pistol mags from various makers in it (including the 33-rd Glock 18 mags). Either way, 9mm out of a 16" barrel has the same ballistics as a .357Magnum & a lot more accuracy than a pistol due to the long barrel. Nothing to sneeze at.

If you want a higher power rifle that is more conventional, feeds a heavier cartridge and takes longer shots (say, 300 yards) then the AK is for you. The ammo is more expensive and the rifle is heavier. There's nothing else like an AK.

The better question for you to ask yourself is: What do YOU need your rifle to do?

In a recent family/friends range outing, there was a 9mm K-T Sub2K with Glock 18 mags, a nice AK, a Galil, an FN-FAL, and a variety of milsurp boltys. We went through a solid 1000 rounds of 9mm, ran out of 9mm actually, people were standing in line to shoot the KelTec, and other range users came by to fondle it and brought their own 9mm so they could shoot it. The Ak was the third most popular gun there but we took ammo home for it. The second most popular gun there was a Colt HBAR national match with a 20" heavy barrel upper. Again, we shot about 300 rounds through it.
 
I've had a HiPoint 9mm for 3 years and an SKS.

My advice, get a Saiga for $275. Lighter than an SKS, can be 'converted' to AK form and done much cheaper than an Arsenal for $700. My HiPoint has snapped a couple parts off and been sent back to the factory 3 times.
 
9mm isn't much cheaper.

7.62x39 1,000 rounds = $170

9mm 1,000 rounds = $150
 
One big question would be where do you plan to shoot it?

A 9mm carbine can be used at an indoor pistol range, but most such ranges would exclude rifle caliber firearms.

The 9mm is smaller, lighter, and handier, somewhat quieter compared to 7.62x39mm, and recoil is practically nil. It is also less powerful, has less effective range, and (to my eye) doesn't look as good. The AK is an excellent carbine, but the sights aren't the best (the short sight radius doesn't help), recoil is not bad but much more noticeable than 9mm, it is bigger and heavier, etc.

My SAR-1 is my favorite rifle, but it wears a Kobra (collimator sight, i.e. tubeless red dot, with multiple reticles). I'd enjoy shooting it less if I were stuck with the factory sights.

I suppose you'd want to think about what you want to do with it. Also, I would handle both of them in the store, and see which one feels more comfortable.
 
bartsimpson123844 wrote:

JWarren- Oh, I didn't realize people actually hunted with them. Sorry, I guess I didn't think before I posted. Now I realize that the AK could be a good platform for a decent brush or truck gun.

No worries my friend. It is a common misconception. One can basically look at a 7.62x39 (with hunting as opposed to FMJ ammunition) as filling the same slot a 30-30 would fill-- and probably more deer have been taken with a 30-30 than any other caliber.


On a side note, AK's poor accuracy is overblown. There are basically 2 (in my opinion) major factors that contribute to inaccuracy in AKs: The iron sights and the trigger.

Iron sights are not a real issue. If someone wants better accuracy from their iron sights, Mojo makes a great replacement that will tighten groups significantly. Heck, considering that my Remington 700 doesnt' even have iron sights, I barely consider them part of a firearm. If anything, they are a factory installed "accessory."

Triggers are a different matter-- and largely a personal choice. Some learn their trigger and BECOME accurate with the one they were given. Others can install RAA adjustable triggers with good results. My first deer was taken with a HK-91 that had a trigger like a child's cap gun. Because I was a kid, and there were not any other options, I learned that crappy trigger and became accurate with the firearm. It can be done.

While I wholy concure that the 7.62x39 in an AK platform is a good truck gun or brush hunting rifle, this is largely a limitation of the caliber. Again, I'd use 7.62x39 in any role I'd use a 30-30 and would not use the AK in any role that a 30-30 would be passed over for.

In 308 win., My Saiga has proven to be an accurate and capable rifle to any distance I've taken game with a bolt action. With optics, it is pulling 1-1.5 MOA groups. Or course, I can do better with a quality bolt action, but it's still in the vitals.


The main thing is getting to know a rifle and its capabilities and determine if you are comfortable with it. As Zumbo seems to be learning, there's more than one way to skin a cat. (who the hell came up with that phrase anyway?-- and why would anyone want to skin a cat???)



-- John
 
He is from California. So it doesn't make a difference.
I don't believe either the Hi-Point or any AK lookalike is legal in California unless you owned it prior to the ban.

That brought to mind one thing in the original post, though:

*ETA* Disregard the CA location thing because once I purchase the "assault weapons" I want and keep them at my father's house in ND, I will send in my California Out of State Military Assault weapons permit. Then bring them out to California where I can LEGALLY own and posess them.
I don't think you can legally purchase long guns out of state under California law (I *think* Federal law allows states to allow it--I may be wrong--but would be surprised if California allowed it), but I am not an expert on Cali gun laws. (I trust you've looked into the legalities of this?)
 
+1 on going the Saiga route. I just got mine last week (7.62x39) for $324 OTD. Still unconverted as of now, but will make it's way to AK status soooooon.:D
 
quote: (who the hell came up with that phrase anyway?-- and why would anyone want to skin a cat???)

It originally referred to removing the skin from a catfish prior to cooking it.

Bill
 
Is this a joke!? Go with a ak!! ive shot a hi point carbine in 9mm and was very unimpressed. The finish, stock, and overall design of the rifle sucks and when the guy let me shoot it tried to do a "tactical" reload, the POS jammed, and he had trouble getting it undone. As a proud own of a mak-90 and a Rob arms vepr in 7.62x39, they are far superior to any hp!! (Vepr is THE best ak on the market, except for some of the arsenal aks)
 
I don't think you can legally purchase long guns out of state under California law (I *think* Federal law allows states to allow it--I may be wrong--but would be surprised if California allowed it), but I am not an expert on Cali gun laws. (I trust you've looked into the legalities of this?)

California cannot stop you from buying a long gun in a state which will allow you to purchase it. They can however not allow you to bring it into California. You can still own it though...

Man... California is F'd up.
 
hmm... were hi-points ever relied on by an actual military force? that would be enough to influence my decision.
most widely recognized assault rifle in the world vs. chunky POS.
that being said, I have both, and my WASR 10 is a heck of a lot more fun then the hi-point.
 
California cannot stop you from buying a long gun in a state which will allow you to purchase it.
True, but federal law says you can't buy a gun out of state that isn't legal in your home state.

...
(b) It shall be unlawful for any licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector to sell or deliver—
...
(3) any firearm to any person who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe does not reside in (or if the person is a corporation or other business entity, does not maintain a place of business in) the State in which the licensee’s place of business is located, except that this paragraph (A) shall not apply to the sale or delivery of any rifle or shotgun to a resident of a State other than a State in which the licensee’s place of business is located if the transferee meets in person with the transferor to accomplish the transfer, and the sale, delivery, and receipt fully comply with the legal conditions of sale in both such States...

18 USC 922
 
Bazooka Joe said:
LOL

This is a joke, right?



HAHA, took the words out of my mouth.


Imagine if M. Kalashnikov read this thread - he'd keel over dead that his rifle, perhaps the greatest firearm invented in the 20th century is being compared to a hipoint.


:)
 
Not a good comparison but give the Hi-point its due.
It weights 5.75 pounds AK-47 8.3. The 995 carbine is 32.5 inches long. the Ak 35 inches. The 995 can be fired one handed by a normal person. The ak is a little more difficult. You can reload the 995 faster and in a battery position to be back on target sooner. The AK limited in CAlly to 10 rounds is the same maga capacity as the 995. In a urban or heavy wood situation over 100 yards shot would be the exception.
Personally in my piney woods I will be running around with my SAR-1 with its 30 round magazines but if scouting around and in the trunk of a vehicle the 995 fits a nice useful nitch
 
BillinNH,

More than one way to skin a cat? I was told that it is atleast as old as the Thirty Years War of the early-mid 1600.

As late as the 1980's anyone selling a butchered rabbit in Bavaria and Hesse at least had to display the carcas un quartered with the furry little feet still attached because historically when ever rabbit got scarce greedy butchers would skin cats, remove the feet and heads, hack them up and sell them as rabbit.

At least that's what one German gastehous owner told me after I finshed my rabbit and commented on seeing the bunny feet on carcasses down in the local Metzgerie.

Oh yeah and to the original thread starter.......

HiPoint vs AK.....

Whatever blows your skirts up. As to the arguement about military adoption......I've heard of no US police departments purchasing any model of AK for patrol rifles. I understand HiPoint has made department sales and continues to in both calibers.

I live out in the five acres and larger rural area and still I think I would rather see my average neighbor trying to defend himself with the Pistol Caliber carbines than an AK in 7.62x39, 5.45x39 or 5.56 NATO.

I also would rather see a HiPoint stollen from a car than an AK.

I think most folks even in non stressfull times would be on higher alert seeing a young buck with a military style AK than a HiPoint Carbine. The AK is so recognizable and associated with bad guys and bad deeds that I might consider that if all I really wanted was a plinker and HD gun.

If I had to choose one to go to war with, well yes I would pick an AK, but for Plinking, bumming around, a car gun or even Home Defense I might look real hard at the HiPoint myself. I have only little experience with the guns having shot only a few rounds from two 9s when they first came out. Looked fun, less recoil and less noise. I imagine they have less flash at night as well but have no experience to back it up. Loaded up with something Marshall and Sanow rate at 80 percent or better from a handgun I doubt they would be anything to sneeze at inside just about anyone's house.

Handle both, heft both, convince everyone you are a know nothing noob by throwing them up to shoulder point a few times (with a mag in the AK), shoot them it you have a range that does rentals or can fire even a few rounds at the range, then decide. If you aren't happy with your choice keep saving and use that puppy as a trade in on something in the future.

No one here has to live with your choice or knows what is best for you.....even (don't tell anyone) me.

-Bob Hollingsworth
 
Ak. No question. The AK will feed you, protect you and will be much more effective than a pistol caliber. It's also just as fun.
 
I guess the real question is, what do you want to use the gun for?
Comparing a pistol-caliber carbine to a intermediate cartridge fullsize rifle is like comparing apples to potatoes. Kind of a silly question.

The intended purpose would be to hit paper and have fun.

I want to cheaply and effectively shoot targets and the occasional little critter once I go back to the farm.

*Critter=little animals smaller than a 'yote

~Sub question: Would a 9mm out of a carbine work at yotes? if so, at what range?
 
I'd be comfortable with 9mm out of a carbine on coyotes using 124-147 grain hollow points as far as I could keep all rounds in the chest... say a 6" circle. So probably inside 100 yards would be a go for me.
 
The OP asked about shooting paper and having fun. Also, HD and hunting small critters (yotes). As long as we're talking about less than 100 yds or so, the Hi Point is hands-down. It's lighter. It's cheaper. It's cheaper to feed. It's shorter. It's unstoppable.* When it's not a gun, its a good club.

*I have limited experience with Hi Points. I only have one, and it's a 9mmComp. About 4 or 5 thousand rds no problems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top