Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

high end hk clone?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Ian Johnson, Jan 25, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ian Johnson

    Ian Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    123
    Location:
    Ponchatoula, LA
  2. TwoWheelFiend

    TwoWheelFiend Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2011
    Messages:
    361
    Location:
    Vermont
    My LGS has one, doesn't seem to be the greatest thing in the world. Ive held it a few times, way too utilitarian for me. And the sights are got awful. Just my .02 tho
     
  3. JustinJ

    JustinJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,046
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Too utilitarian? I'm not sure how that happens but PTRs are generally considered to be of high quality and are supposedly built on real HK machinery. Short of the real deal they are probably the best bet.
     
  4. Ar180shooter

    Ar180shooter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    510
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    [​IMG]

    God, how I wish I could get one of these up here... :(
     
  5. animator

    animator Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Messages:
    477
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    They're fine rifles.


    I used one of PTR91inc's barrels for my G3 build. I've been happy with it.
     
  6. Ian Johnson

    Ian Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    123
    Location:
    Ponchatoula, LA
    Yeah I cant decide if I want one of these or a Daniel Defense m4 for my first battle rifle.
     
  7. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    I had one several years ago. In terms of accurately copying the HK design, they are very good. (They have original HK tooling, in case you didn't know.) I just don't happen to like the HK design much and ended up selling it. That's another topic, I suppose.

    If you don't own any military-style rifles, an AR/M4 clone like a Daniel Defense will be far more versatile, reliable, and easier to service and upgrade than almost anything else.
     
  8. Hanzo581

    Hanzo581 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,798
    Location:
    Chesapeake, Virginia
    You forgot "much cheaper to shoot/practice with".
     
  9. Ian Johnson

    Ian Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    123
    Location:
    Ponchatoula, LA
    yeah I do own military rifles lol but they are of a much older variety(mosin, sweede mauser) but this was gonna be my first black rifle and the ar does make more since, plus being a broke college student it REALLY makes sense, but I liked the ptr cause it was different, its definately on my list but might not be what I get next
     
  10. GCMkc

    GCMkc Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    281
    Location:
    Kansas City
    I own a PTR-91 (16" bbl variant) and can say that it is a beautifully made rifle. All of the welds looks good, parts fit tight, action is fluid, and it has had zero malfunctions. I shoot steel case and brass case stuff through it without hiccup. Some accessories are super cheap and some are outrageously expensive (ze German parts). I've had zero experience with a real HK91 but have heard that the PTR's compare most nicely.

    C93 on the left, PTR-91 on the right

    [​IMG]

    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
     
  11. gotboostvr

    gotboostvr Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,367
    Location:
    Buckeye Country
    You could always look at the CETME, sights aren't as nice and you might have to pick over a bad one or two, but they're still very nice rifles.

    My shooting buddy has one, threw a claw mount and a cheap 3x9 on it and we were shooting some pretty small groups with it .
     
  12. seasmoke

    seasmoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    118
    Location:
    Downeast, Maine
    [​IMG]The PTR's are well made firearms. Also check out Vector. The CETME/G3 platform are very reliable and tons of fun to shoot. If your a re-loader, they are not your best choice. My CETME throws brass like a monkey flings poo, 45ft:what: If going for a PTR91, stick with the GI model.
    These guys have a nice selection: http://www.atlanticfirearms.com/category.aspx?cid=93
     
  13. dprice3844444

    dprice3844444 member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,264
    Location:
    se fla i love claymores 01/sot
    they also make a pistol version in 308 and 762x39
     
  14. bozzman3

    bozzman3 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    152
    Location:
    CT.
    Ptr is a great fun rifle.I own A PT and a C93. I would not recommend it as a first battle rifle.The Daniel defense is a great first battle rifle.Cheap to shoot ,high quality and more bells and whistles to add on if you like.
     
  15. seasmoke

    seasmoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    118
    Location:
    Downeast, Maine
    Does Daniel Defense make a Battle Rifle? Don't see one there, just poodle shooters and mall ninja stuff.
     
  16. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    FYI, to many people "battle rifle" always means a rifle firing a full-powered, as in .308 or larger, cartridge (although I can't think of any battle rifle offered in .30-06, 7.62x54R or any other cartridge other than .308 / 7.62x51mm NATO), and a design that was never successful as a fully-auto rifle even if it was offered that way (like the FAL or G3). Obviously a lot of people newer to guns are using "battle rifle" as just any military-style semiauto.
     
  17. Eric M

    Eric M Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    M1 Garand is .30-06.

    FWIW OP, I got to fondle my buddy's PTR-91 and it seemed like a nice rifle.
     
  18. seasmoke

    seasmoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    118
    Location:
    Downeast, Maine
  19. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    I've never heard the Garand classed as a battle rifle before. The definition is fuzzy but always seems to include a detachable box magazine.

    The SVT-40 is the only WWII era rifle I can think of that comes close to the definition. But all I've seen is that the class is fairly limited to the FAL, G3, M14, and original AR-10.
     
  20. Eric M

    Eric M Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    Hm, my definition is a semi-automatic/select fire rifle that shoots a full sized rifle cartridge. I didn't know it required a detachable magazine.
     
  21. bozzman3

    bozzman3 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    152
    Location:
    CT.
    Sooo...... A Ar type rifle is not considered a battle rifle?
     
  22. seasmoke

    seasmoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    118
    Location:
    Downeast, Maine
  23. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    Better off with an ar10 it will be more accurate anyway.
     
  24. RhinoDefense

    RhinoDefense Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    883
    The M16/AR15 is a battle rifle.

    The AR10 type will be more accurate and be easier on brass than the G3 clones like the CETME and the PTR91. If you shoot only commercial ammunition, it's not much of an issue with brass life.
     
  25. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    Not by most people. (Rhino apparently disagrees.) It's not a precise or official term anyway so it hardly matters.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page