Footcheese
Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2008
- Messages
- 17
+1 for GP100
I haven't read the entire thread but I do own a Redhawk and Ruger's quality is not an issue. It's got plenty of nice little details I didn't expect after reading Ruger hate posts on the Internet (serrated top of the barrel, rosewood grips with a little inlaid metal redhawk,...). My father owns an old S&W Model 60 and my Redhawk has much friendlier checkering on the hammer than his Model 60 (unless you like having a raw thumb for no reason).
On the first page of this thread there was a guy saying S&W was more reliable because of the whole cast vs forged argument. If you read the Wikipedia article on Investment Casting you'll notice mention of it's use in aerospace and power generation, neither of which are industries with a very high fault tolerance.
Since you most likely want the highest quality revolver for under $500 that YOU'RE GOING TO FIRE, it's Ruger. You can get Hogue Tamer grips for a GP100 too (unlike S&W J frame).
I haven't read the entire thread but I do own a Redhawk and Ruger's quality is not an issue. It's got plenty of nice little details I didn't expect after reading Ruger hate posts on the Internet (serrated top of the barrel, rosewood grips with a little inlaid metal redhawk,...). My father owns an old S&W Model 60 and my Redhawk has much friendlier checkering on the hammer than his Model 60 (unless you like having a raw thumb for no reason).
On the first page of this thread there was a guy saying S&W was more reliable because of the whole cast vs forged argument. If you read the Wikipedia article on Investment Casting you'll notice mention of it's use in aerospace and power generation, neither of which are industries with a very high fault tolerance.
Since you most likely want the highest quality revolver for under $500 that YOU'RE GOING TO FIRE, it's Ruger. You can get Hogue Tamer grips for a GP100 too (unlike S&W J frame).