HK: Because we hate you

Status
Not open for further replies.
I had no idea about any of this. I no longer have any interest in the HK brand. Thanks.

Don't get too caught up in all of it.

The deal where HK had other guns destroyed makes everyone mad no doubt, but it's pretty commonly done in many industries.

If you are taking X product in on trade for your new product Y, you want to make sure that the old X product doesn't get resold onto the used market, potentially hurting your future sales.

It's business. Sure it sucks to see a bunch of guns destroyed but you gotta be silly to think that HK is the only company that's ever done that.
 
"H&K used to be a "boutique" handgun manufacturer."


What?

Kind of like Harley Davidson used to be a boutique motorcycle manufacturer?
 
foreign guns

I dont understand this love with foreign guns.are you trying to destroy american arms factories.I love my 1911s,I like my WW2 browning hi-power,and I love my Smiths,and rugers.
we are loseing our gun manufactuures to foreign investers.REM/marlin/H&R,Win,Savage.is the foreign so much better.look what happened to S&W when it was owned by Thompson ind of england.the military uses foreign rifles pistols and machine guns.what the H**l is wrong with america.the new mg looks much like a 1919.and the 1911 could have been made in double stack and in 9 mm.the m16 would be good jungle rifle,and the m14 for open warfare.now we go back and refurbish m14s.we sold the machinery to korea the M1 to Italy.gott help us for being so stupid.
:uhoh::rolleyes::banghead:
 
I love my Smiths,and rugers.


HSSSS it burns my ears!

Bill Ruger said:
"No honest man needs more than 10 rounds in any gun."

Bill Ruger said:
"I never meant for simple civilians to have my 20 or 30 round magazines or my folding stock."
Bill Ruger said:
"I see nothing wrong with waiting periods."
http://www.thegunzone.com/rkba/papabill.html

this goes above and beyond "we dont see a market" or "we dont want the hassle" of HK.

this goes straight to one of two things, a slimy attempt to protect the market for Ruger revolvers and low cap handguns. or worst his honest opinion of our rights as citizens
 
foreign guns

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I dont understand this love with foreign guns.are you trying to destroy american arms factories.I love my 1911s,I like my WW2 browning hi-power,and I love my Smiths,and rugers.
we are loseing our gun manufactuures to foreign investers.REM/marlin/H&R,Win,Savage.is the foreign so much better.look what happened to S&W when it was owned by Thompson ind of england.the military uses foreign rifles pistols and machine guns.what the H**l is wrong with america.the new mg looks much like a 1919.and the 1911 could have been made in double stack and in 9 mm.the m16 would be good jungle rifle,and the m14 for open warfare.now we go back and refurbish m14s.we sold the machinery to korea the M1 to Italy.gott help us for being so stupid.

You'vegottastartusingthatspacebar.
 
Im gonna go out on a limb here and say I love my HK P30 and wouldnt want any other 9mm poly frame handgun, or any other polymer for that matter. Of course this will be my only polymer in my future collection, I like all steel best. Gotta have one poly though.
 
I don't particularly care for HK. The 5 in my collection are all that I want and nothing about them (neither the current offerings nor stories of peoples dealings with HK CS) inspires me to acquire more.

I got a laugh out of this one:

Have you talked to Dell people?

and this one:

Do you mean the sales person in the US or the tech support in Pakistan?

I just had an experience with Dell last week. A woman with a heavily accented voice called me at work and asked if I was satisfied with the computer I bought last year and if I wanted to buy and extended warranty. Her accent was so bad I had to stop her several times and ask her to repeat what she said. I said not interested and she got mad! :cuss:

Oh well, next time I buy a computer, I'll buy from somebody else.
 
Good point Hoppy...i wont own a Ruger because of that though i will give SW some credit, they are once again American owned(they were britsh owned during that bit) and the owner has been trying hard to geve them a good anme again
 
I think companies can change their positions, but I think it is highly unlikely. Ruger, in my opinion, is changing in a favorable stance. They are now offering 20 round mags with mini-14s and the sr9 has a mag capacity of 17. Also ruger is offering anyone who has bought an sr9 before the recall free services and an extra mag to go with. I think they are trying to make things right (I could be wrong though)
One more thing, Bill Ruger isn't there anymore.
 
Last edited:
I have a USP Compact, and it's a pretty good pistol (but not as good as my Kimber). But my problem is that I'm left handed, and for a year and a half now, I've been unable to obtain an ambidextrous safety for the USP. H&K Germany just hasn't been shipping parts for the civilian market, apparently. I'll never buy another H&K product for that reason. You can't get parts for them when you need 'em. Probably 10% of their market is left handed, but they don't give a damn about us. Consequently, I don't give a damn about them.
 
As mentioned S&W is getting thier act together since they ceased to be owned by the British.

Nothing more than 5 rounds for the Mini, even now.
Same old BS.
Ruger does sell 20 round magazines with the NRA Mini-14 to states they can be shipped to, read the grey fine print on this:
http://ruger.com/Firearms/FAProdView?model=5835&return=Y
All of the NRA mini-14 models are shipped with 2 (20) round magazines unless your state law says otherwise.



Most American companies have ceased trying to appease the antis. Some due to new ownership, and others because they realized it was a losing game. Everyime they gave an inch another mile was proposed in legislation and new required features. "Reasonable restrictions" never had and end in sight, and if they met one two new ones were proposed, and the existing ones were permanent.
They realized they would be making really expensive (to make) firearms with dozens of unnecessary features to a shrinking market forbidden from more and more firearm types unless they took a stand.

15 years ago they were falling over themselves to be the first to appease an anti requirement and sell thier model before the competition. Now the internet is mainstream, much of the community purchases based on thier stances, they can hear America speak, and they are singing a whole different tune.

Many American companies are seeing the light.

A lot more than you can say for H&K.
 
When we are all equal then we all stand side by side fighting for the same rights. Once we are distinct seperate classes, we are on different sides. Ask the police in parts of Europe that walk around with certain firearms if they believe thier citizens should even be allowed to have in thier homes what the LEO are free to walk around with. They will usualy be against it. Once they are held to seperate laws and standards, a divide is created. If they were subject to the same law they would be absolutely opposed to the restrictions for anyone. When subject to seperate laws many in fact support restrictions on others, restrictions they then are tasked with enforcing. The trend to exempt LEO in new gun control and restrictions is increasing, in no small part thanks to the attitudes of places like H&K who go above and beyond.
Changing America for the worse and laying the groundwork for future inequality and oppression.


Wow, well said.
 
THR was better when "hate" threads weren't allowed.

No more "HATE" threads.
A problem has arisen.

Just in this single forum, within the past month, there have been at least ten threads based on the "Hate" of one type firearm or another. I don't know about in the other venues.

Some of the threads have been good natured and lightweight. Others have unfortunately been marked by bickering and acrimony. "Hate" is a very strong emotion. Most of those using the word probably mean they are disdainful of a particular item, brand, or cartridge. Some are only impatient with the controversy. Others, unfortunately, become very invested in advancing their own brand loyalty, their own fad, or their own philosophy. Some even engage in personal attacks on those who don't agree with them. It has been necessary for staff to close down two discussions, and others probably deserve it.

Friends, this is NOT The High Road way. Please, re-read forum rules, especially the part about attacking the argument and not the individual.

Look, let's simply stop tossing around the term HATE. If you MUST say you don't like something, or that you think your choice is the best, go for it. Just don't entitle your thread with the word HATE. Any thread so entitled will be closed and removed. Many members write lengthy and thoughtful responses. It would be a shame for their hard work to disappear.

Please recall, the board owner and the staff set the acceptable parameters in order to promote civil discourse. This is not censorship, simply moderation. I hope that this action will be seen only as a way to taper off and back away from unnecessary confrontation.
- - - -
Best,
Johnny Guest
Moderator, Handguns: Autoloaders
 
i honestly wasn't trying to start a hate thread. Its just the phrase sounds like it could have had a funny story behind it.

I could just hear a long conversation b/w an unhappy gun-owner and a disgruntled customer service rep (of any company) going in circles over something, until finally the gun-owner says "well why are you selling guns w/ faulty firing pins etc, why is this gun a piece of junk, etc"until the situation climaxes and the rep exclaims "because you suck, and we hate you"
 
I don't think this is the kind of "hate" thread they're talking about. A while back, someone started a thread with a title to the effect of "Why all the Glock hate?" (not sure if Glock came first. . .) This was followed by "Why all the 1911 hate?", along with separate threads for Sig, Lorcin, and Jennings. Search threads from April, 2005, and you'll see them.
 
Interesting. For all the HK hate I don't remember them putting locks on their guns or limiting us to 10 round magazines like the 2 you've listed here.

My USP 45 had 10 rounders and an ILS.

I, too, had bought into the HK mystique when I was younger. Once I had given $830 for one and then actually shot it and found it to be less accurate than my Colts and no more ergonomic than a Glock, I sold it to fund a S&W 1006 and never looked back.

HK's arrogance aside, the guns are really rather unspectacular and certainly not worth the premium price tag they sit on the shelves with. The USP/P2000/HK45 should be $500 guns right along side the S&W M&P and Springfield XD. The HK-91, perhaps in the $1,800-$2,000 range with the Armalite AR-10T that shoots better and doesn't destroy brass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top