NEW YORK CITY -- An international coalition of anti-gun groups called on Hollywood to convince a U.N. conference in New York to impose legally-binding United Nations controls over small arms and personal firearms.
This is a very creative piece of writing. Since
the global corporate-government organized crime cartel that calls itself "the United Nations" does not need any convincing by
it's own "Non-Government Organizations" via
their collective magic wand and tool of perversion known as
Hollywood on this subject matter.
Brian Wood, a top arms trade analyst for Amnesty International and ControlArms, told anti-gun activists in New York that the arms dealers who have supplied Africa's most brutal war lords over the past decade were French, Russian and Ukrainian - not American.
Well; this won't matter to the captivated foreign audiences in S. America, Africa, Europa, Asia and the Far East soaking up this piece of audio-visual programming produced by
the magic wand. Neither will it occur to most of them that those who probably run the most arms, dope, prostitution and other illicit trades, and stealing their money - are their saviours,
the U.N, along with their own national leaders.
Victor Bout, who became famous for running guns into improvised air strips in Africa in exchange for raw diamonds, is a Russian national. Leonid Minin, arrested in Milan, Italy on August 5, 2000 for selling arms to the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in Sierra Leone, is from Ukraine.
Well; freelancers do get busted. Governments hate competition, and the occasional "big bust" makes them look like they are doing something with all the public money they steal.
And what they do not mention here that all these alphabet revolutionary fronts are just that.
Fronts. Controlled conflicts for controlled change.
He lauded two nations for "a high degree of extra-territorial application" of their national arms brokering laws, South Africa and the United States.
This is bs; South Africa has been the conduit for ars funneled from other countries; like the State of Israel for example. And our own nation, the United States has supplied it's own share like Iraq.
Nevertheless, anti-gun activists made clear at week-long meetings in New York to prepare this summer's UN Small Arms and Light Weapons conference, that their goal was to place legally-binding international restrictions on the possession of personal firearms and the international arms trade.
I wonder how long it will take to dawn on enough people
where our national leadership (and I use that term loosely) and
their active participation and complicity with this global corporate-government organized crime cartel is taking us.
"I was in Sierre Leone," British activist Anthea Lawson, a spokesperson for IANSA, told Newsmax. "How can I explain to people who have gone through incredible suffering because of small arms that NRA [National Rifle Association] concerns are blocking an international agreement that would make lots of people safer?"
And how long ago, and how many times have some people said that this sort of thing is precisely
what was planned and coming,
how it would be presented,
how it would be worded,
what emotional buttons it would push, and how it would progress?
International gun control was necessary, she argued, "because the legal trade in weapons is where the illegal trade begins. The weapons themselves all come out of the legal trade."
Although this is somewhat true; it is not completely true - especially in the field of "light weapons". But regardless - this is simply stating the obvious, and is a predictable angle we have seen used on the domestic front. Ultimately the correct response to this observation is; "So?"
In Africa's worst killing spree in modern history, an estimated 500,000 Tutsis were massacred by rival Hutu tribesmen in Rwanda in 1994. But the weapons used were machetes, not firearms.
Ah yes; Rwanda. Well, Rwanda was not about weapons, it was about creating
demand for a more aggressive U.N. among other things.
Former U.S. Congressman Bob Barr, who is serving as an unpaid advisor to the U.S. delegation to the conference, said that the goal of the non-government organizations and the countries supporting them "is to take away the freedom we possess in our country to possess firearms."
Not to pick on Bob Barr; but it is our
current administration and , uh, leadership,
that supports and is complicit with those in the U.N. and it's global criminal agenda.
Just as anti-gun control advocates in the United States, the international NGOs were "focusing on the instrument, not on the underlying problem," he told NewsMax. "It's relatively easy to get a handle on the true problem, which is how do you prevent military weapons from getting into the hands of rogue regimes and genocidal maniacs."
Well, you destroy all those not in actual military inventory - eliminate the "surplus market"
You license and track those willing to jump the hoops to have some of these awful tools of destruction, while everyone else can have a "duck or deer" gun.
For now
The Bush administration has set out several "red lines" that the United States would not cross, he said.
"We will allow no discussion, no negotiation, over civilian possession of firearms," Barr said. Nor will the U.S. agree to any U.N. effort to impose binding U.N. controls on what "non-state actors" a member state will supply with weapons.
Again, not to pick on Mr Barr, but this is not binding in any sense whatsoever. A few ghastly and timely events, the right presentation, and watch all the cowering slaves nod in agreement at the "unpalatable but necessary steps".
Ask anyone who watched the British television media coverage of the Hungerford and Dunblaine shootings in the U.K. Saatchi & Saatchi could not have done a better job.
"We feel it's the prerogative of the president of the United States to decide what groups to support," Barr said. "There could be freedom fighters in ‘Freedonia' we find it in our interest to arm."
Yep; "groups" like
the United Nations.
Countries backing the effort to place legally-binding international restrictions on the trade in small arms include Canada, which hosted a presentation by Amnesty International at the United Nations, Britain, Mexico, Japan, the Netherlands, and Brazil
Canada; our Pan-American provincial neighbors
and fellow servants of the Crown. Of course, who else
---------------------------------------------
http://ussliberty.org
htp://ssunitedtstates.org