Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How does the Henry Lever action .22 compare to others

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Quilbilly, Jul 15, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Quilbilly

    Quilbilly Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    162
    Location:
    Quilcene, WA
    So I wanted a .22 for some cheap plinking and I came home with a Henry Arms lever action .22 (http://www.henryrepeating.com/h001_leveraction.cfm). I bought it cause it was cheap and I did not have a lot to spend. I have a cheap Bushnell 4X32 scope on it. I am very new to rifle shooting but I can easily make about 1" groups at 100 ft and I had no problem hitting cans at 100 yds. I am wondering about how accurate this rifle could be at 100 yds with the right scope. How does the Henry compare to the Marlin or the 10/22 in terms of accuracy? Thanks.
     
  2. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,374
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    A good .22 rifle would shoot a 1" group or less at 50 yards (150 feet.) But that assumes quality ammo and a skilled shooter. If you're new to the rifle, you can expect groups to shrink if you practice and experiment with different brands of ammo.

    I would consider a 1" group at 100 feet to be excellent for squirrel hunting and general plinking.
     
  3. Quilbilly

    Quilbilly Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    162
    Location:
    Quilcene, WA
    Just for clarification, I was shooting from a bench.
     
  4. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,374
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    I figured you were. A 1" group at 100 feet from the offhand position is too good to believe.
     
  5. Deus Machina

    Deus Machina Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,181
    Location:
    Brandon, Florida
    I did a write-up of my Henry and different, mostly cheap, ammo here.

    Keep in mind each gun is different, each likes different ammo, you may be a better or worse shooter than I, and any Bushnell scope is certainly higher quality than my $16 BSA, which I still find acceptable.

    Those tests were at 50 yards, too--half again your 100 feet.
     
  6. CZguy

    CZguy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,975
    Location:
    Missouri
    The Henry falls right in the middle, with the Marlin being more accurate than the Henry, but the Henry is much more accurate than a (stock) 10/22.

    The Henry has the best customer service in the industry should you have a problem.

    As stated above accuracy with a .22 is a matter of trying different ammo until you find the one your particular rifle likes.
     
  7. Quilbilly

    Quilbilly Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    162
    Location:
    Quilcene, WA
    Thanks walter, that is very interesting. I was using Remington sub-sonic .22lr rounds and Stinger .22shorts. There was no difference in grouping that I could see at 100ft. I thought that was interesting.
     
  8. TCB in TN

    TCB in TN Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    Middle, TN
    Agree with the others. The Henry is a good little gun, a big step below the Marlin 39, but a good deal for the money. I let mine go a while back, just didn't shoot it enough, like my Marlins better, but it was a very good little gun.
     
  9. FMJMIKE

    FMJMIKE Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,577
    Location:
    Copper Hill, Virginia
    The Henry is a fun gun but the receiver is painted. The finish comes off very easily. The stock sights aren't great either. Triggers vary from good to average on the two I owned.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page