Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

how much of a speed increase makes a difference

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by PT1911, Apr 13, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PT1911

    PT1911 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,139
    Location:
    alabama
    so I hear this a lot.


    "Only 1200 FPS, that just isnt fast enough"
    What is the real advantage of an extra 100 FPS or 200 FPS?

    I cannot imagine a bullet that doesnt penetrate and "mushroom" at 1200 FPS and magically spreading wider and going farther with an added couple hundred FPS....
     
  2. Hungry Seagull

    Hungry Seagull member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,167
    Speed. Hm.

    I fire a one ounce magnum slug at 1760 out of the magnum shotgun and boy does it KICK like a mule. 5 foot flame out of the muzzle and virtually NO drop at all at any distance inside that range. There is a one hell of alot of energy at that spec.

    I fire a Brenneke at 1400 or so and it still is pretty heft. This time it's slightly over one ounce and has almost as much energy availible and just a little drop.

    I shoot a managed recoil at 1200 and it's not so much recoil, has more energy than availible to my 45 ACP at any distance.

    I fire my 45 Lawman Training round 230 grain ACP at about 830, energy falls off rapidly with range and drop. The Gold dots are slightly hotter at about 870 or so FPS.

    Fire a BB gun or paint balls and you will not get very much FPS.

    The energy necessary to move a mass to X velocity in a measured distance becomes greater in mutipule of itself for ever 200 fps increase I think.

    It's almost like a car. You can kick a commutebox from 0 to 60 with 110 horses in half an hour... but do the same task with 500 horses in a 70's era muscle car in much less time even though you have twice the weight.

    I enjoy the hot mags at 1700 fps, but they beat me to death even though all the rounds follow each other through the first hole at or near the bulls eye.

    I prefer to shoot in the 1400 feet per second range for shotguns. 850 is hot enough for handguns for me. There are guns and ammo availible at much greater speeds.. and such.

    Tis thinking.. a piece of rock about the size of a quarter moving at 20,000 mph (Whatever fps that is...) will give the space station a good knock.
     
  3. BhmBill

    BhmBill Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    591
    Location:
    Vegas
    Idk?

    a 158gr .357 at 1200fps is roughly 500ft/lbs of muzzle energy. the same 158gr .357 at 1300fps has almost 20% more muzzle energy than the 1200fps load and 1400fps would be upwards of 40% more muzzle energy.

    If the round is designed to mushroom at 1200fps, I don't think it'd hurt to have an extra 200fps behind it unless it caused problems with excessive and unmanageable muzzle flip (if we're talkin self defense or rapid target shootin)
     
  4. Ben Shepherd

    Ben Shepherd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    4,755
    Location:
    Utah
    With rifles the difference isn't nearly as pronounced as a handgun. Pure math. Think of it on a percentage basis and you'll see what I mean.

    Terminal preformance can(and generally does) change drastically with pistol projectiles between 1000 and 1500 fps.
     
  5. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18,302
    Location:
    Ft. Worth
  6. Ed Ames

    Ed Ames Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,899
    Location:
    Tejas Norte
    Energy equals mass times velocity squared. :)

    Or, said another way... for every ~1.4x velocity improvement (1000fps to 1414 fps, 1414fps to 2000, etc) you double the energy, mass being equal.
     
  7. Claude Clay

    Claude Clay Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,700
    Location:
    CT
    every one knows

    speed kills

    what the gun can handle and what you can control defines top end for me. couple to that the terminal ballistics of the bullet and the intended use of the bullet [ pins/pineapple/people]. criteria to help chose a cartrage/gun for a purpose.
     
  8. kirklandkie

    kirklandkie Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Messages:
    213
    Location:
    Connecticut
    here's my analysis for the question of speed:
    gravity is a constant, it'll pull a bullet downward at 32ft/s regardless of the mass of the bullet. the faster the bullet is moving the less time it'll spend in the air and thus the less "drop" it'll have from gravity.
    i'd say that speed has more to do with accuracy then stopping power

    -kirk
     
  9. jakemccoy

    jakemccoy Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,601
    Location:
    Northern California
    You mean constant acceleration downward at 32 ft/s^2.
     
  10. Justin

    Justin Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    Duplicate topic.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page