Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

HP-38 vs. 231

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by aerod1, Jul 28, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. aerod1

    aerod1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    969
    Location:
    Garland, TX
    I was at a gun show Saturday and while looking at the powders A person told me that 231 and HP-38 was the same stuff. What's your thoughts. I have been using 231 but the HP-38 is cheaper. I'll check the data sheets as well but was just wondering what y'all thought. BTW, I load mild 240 gr. LSWC, 44 mag loads with 231, up to 1000 fps.:)
    Thanks,
     
  2. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,998
    Well, you have to be careful what people tell you at gun shows, especially if they have something to sell. In this case, he was right; HP38 comes off the same production line in St Marks, Florida that Win 231 does. Now that Hodgdon distributes Winchester powders you can see it in their loading data:

    .44 Magnum
    240 GR. LSWC CAST Winchester 231 .430" 1.620" 5.5 800 12,000 CUP 11.0 1334 38,100 CUP

    240 GR. LSWC CAST Hodgdon HP-38 .430" 1.620" 5.5 800 12,000 CUP 11.0 1334 38,100 CUP

    Some manuals show a difference, and I have seen it, too; but powder can vary lot-to-lot no matter what the label. I have some W231 in the old metal can that is noticeably slower burning than recent production HP38. I will use the W231 for .38 Specials as long as it lasts because my .38 press has fixed powder bushings for my standard loads. Changing to HP38 gives higher velocity than needed.
     
  3. Ol` Joe

    Ol` Joe Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    2,087
    Location:
    michigan
    Call Hodgdon or drop them a E-mail. They should tell you, both are distrubuted by them.

    BTW, I`ve heard they are the same from a few sources. The same as with W296/H110, W760/ H414, ect. Hodgdon repackages powder from various manufactures with own label. The difference is, they are different lots of powder then the one the makers label as their own. The next batch can and will alter burning rates for both brands, and they could swap places on the charts.
     
  4. Grumulkin

    Grumulkin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    2,560
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    Look at "Hodgdon's 2008 Annual Manual Reloading" and you will find that in several instances where one powder is listed, another powder is usually also listed with EXACTLY the same data including starting and maximum loads, velocities and pressures. This could only happen if they were the same powder. The following powders are equivalent:

    HP-38 = Winchester 231
    H110 = Winchester 296
    H414 = Winchester 760

    In the case of H110 and H414 I also confirmed this via e-mail with Hodgdon.
     
  5. oldgold

    oldgold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    434
    Location:
    ohio
    Good to know about H414. Scarce around here.

    I already knew about these.

    HP-38 = W231
    HS-6 = W540
    HS-7 = W571
    H110 = W296
    Ramshot Silhouette = WAP
     
  6. schmeky

    schmeky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,190
    Location:
    West Monroe, Louisiana
    This is great information. After all these years of reloading, this old dog learned something new. Woof, woof.
     
  7. zeke

    zeke Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    638
    Location:
    NW Wi
    Grumulkin-that would only happen if those writing the manual just used the same data from one powder.

    Even getting exactly the same pressure and velocity from 2 different trials of powder from the same jug is near impossible.
     
  8. QuickRick

    QuickRick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    56
    Location:
    Northern Idaho
    Sometimes you will see slight differences in load data with these powders for the same cartridge in various manuals. I suspect this is due to nothing more than the lot to lot variances (usually slight) with all smokeless powders.
     
  9. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    21,704
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    I have confirmed by writing Winchester that W231 and HP-38 are the same exact powders. (and so are the others mentioned in this post) Just as I wrote to get the confirmation so should you. You should never trust anyone when it comes to loading components and recipes.
     
  10. KegCommando

    KegCommando Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Messages:
    179
    Does anyone know what year they became the same powder?

    And which of the formulas "went away" to be replaced by the other?
     
  11. Steve C

    Steve C Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,642
    Just because HP38 and W231 are the same powder doesn't mean they have the same burn rate or load data. Canister grade powders for reloading are blended from lots of bulk powders bought by the selling companies. HP38 was always blended a bit faster by Hodgdon than W231 by Winchester.

    If you look at load manuals published other than by Hodgdon you will see loads using HP38 where always a bit lower than those with W231. As Hodgdon took over the marketing and distributing of W231 they simply lowered the charge level in the data they publish for W231 to HP38 levels as it was perfectly safe to go to the lower level.

    I'm not sure if Hodgdon controls the blending of W231 powder now or if its still being done under Winchester control. If Hodgdon standardized the burn rates for both powders to the HP38 level then for all intents and purposes any W231 powder bought after that may be exactly the same as HP38 but more information is needed to confirm this as a fact.
     
  12. bluewater

    bluewater Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Messages:
    41
    Location:
    Florida
    Similar Powders​

    1. Accurate Arms #9 Ramshot Enforcer

    2. Hodgdon H-110 Winchester 296

    3. Hodgdon HP-38 Winchester 231 Ramshot ZIP

    4. Hodgdon HS-6 Winchester 540 Ramshot True Blue

    5. Hodgdon HS-7 Winchester 571

    6. Winchester Action Pistol Ramshot Silhouette
     
  13. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,998
    Steve,

    I have a little W231 in the old metal can that does indeed take about .2 grain more powder for a given .38 or .45 velocity than late date HP38.

    But current Hodgdon www site data shows EXACTLY the same loads with W231 and HP38. The pressures are the SAME. They can only be testing that grade of powder once to get everything EXACTLY the same. Have they fudged their HP38 spec to match W231, vice versa, or just decided to CALL them the same? I dunno.
     
  14. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,671
    Location:
    Alabama
    3 pounder? Me too.
     
  15. KegCommando

    KegCommando Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Messages:
    179
    The reason I asked about the date is because I have a load book with not very much info on .380 acp, which lists a load for a 100gr FMJ using HP-38 but not W-231 and based on the published date of the manual I was trying to determine if I could use that info.
     
  16. Sport45

    Sport45 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    Messages:
    2,783
    Location:
    Houston, TX
  17. earplug

    earplug Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,627
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    don't worry

    I read as much as I felt I needed to make a rational decison and I dumped my small lot of HP 38 into my large lot of WW231.
    The sun came up, my Model 14, 15 and 642 were happy with 4 grains of mixed powder with a 158 grain load.
     
  18. jfh

    jfh Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2003
    Messages:
    4,859
    Location:
    Maple Plain, MN
    ...and another 3-lb. metal can of 231.

    Great minds think alike, I guess.:)

    But I didn't know about HS-6 / 540 / True Blue--at least for HS-6. That'll save some money.

    Jim H.
     
  19. benzuncle

    benzuncle Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    Messages:
    304
    Location:
    Central Florida
    I had a copy of the letter saying they are the same...

    ...that I saved for just such a post, but, I'll be darned if I can find it now. This was a photocopy signed by the president, CEO or what have you stating that the powders are the same. As so many others ahead of me have attested to that, I feel comfortable throwing this out.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page