Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hunting: A Privilege or a Right?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Highland Ranger, Jun 3, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Highland Ranger

    Highland Ranger Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,299
    Location:
    New Jersey Highlands
    (NJ) Hunting: A Privilege or a Right?

    I am in the process of getting my NJ hunting license. Aside from the rigorousness of the course work and testing impressing me, the 2 hour video course begins with a discussion of hunting being a privilege not a right.

    Somehow that strikes me as wrong. Seems to be that if you need to hunt to eat, and there are those in rural parts of NJ who depend on harvested deer for meat, then it is a right.

    Also, although I still need to take the field test, let me tell you, those who are less intelligent or illiterate will not be passing this test. They certainly don’t make it easy . . . .

    So is it a privilege or a right?

    (Very anti 2a course btw: their gun safety section: "never load a firearm in your house")
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2004
  2. La Pistoletta

    La Pistoletta Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Messages:
    601
    Location:
    Sweden
    It's neither a privilege nor a right. People can take the stance of prohibiting you from doing it, but really it has no validity.
     
  3. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,263
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    I'd say it's a right which properly is subject to controls. The purpose of most of the controls has to do with the health of game animal species for the long term known as "perpetuity".

    The second set of controls is that of knowledge and safety, for the mutual protection of hunters and that part of society which might be within range of projectiles of whatever sort.

    But where is it written that one's only source of food MUST be a grocery store? Have I no right to be a "natural-food freak"? :D

    Am I wrong in believing that the power of the state and of public opinion has turned more than one right into a privilege?

    Regardless of my view, I certainly wouldn't consider it to be a Good Thing if every physically/mentally competent person in the U.S. of A. decided to go deer hunting on Opening Day.

    :), Art
     
  4. mercedesrules

    mercedesrules Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,010
    Hunting on your own land is a right. Hunting on the land of others is a privilege. I consider hunting on so-called government land as a right since I don't consider it to be rightfully owned (it was purchased with stolen money).
     
  5. XLMiguel

    XLMiguel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,551
    Location:
    Santa Fe, NM
    Art,
    I used to eat a lot of 'natural' foods, but then I found out about all the people dying of 'natural' causes . . .:neener:
     
  6. 41mag

    41mag Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2003
    Messages:
    1,021
    Location:
    western mi
    This is a little off topic but I'm curious,Highland Ranger,exactly what hoops you need to jump through to get a hunting liscence in NJ?
    Care to share?
     
  7. whoami

    whoami Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    258
    Location:
    Peoples Demokratik Republik of New Jersey
    Neither. Like everything else involving guns in NJ, hunting is completely illegal unless explicitly authorized by the government according to their specific and subject regulations and exceptions.
     
  8. Highland Ranger

    Highland Ranger Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,299
    Location:
    New Jersey Highlands
    I'm not done yet but you need your firearms ID to get a long arm and ammo. So although that isn't officially part of the process, it essentially is. That can take months in NJ, depending on your location.

    I am in a rural, conservative part of the state, probably one of the better places, and it took 2 months even though the law says it should take no more than 30 days.

    As far as the hunting permit itself, the NJ Dept of Fish and Game has a free home study course. Its a combination of video, booklet and home study workbook.

    You watch the video and fill in the workbook (17 pages, a few hundred questions). That took roughly three hours. The tape or DVD is almost two hours long but you need to pause to fill in the answers on the workbook.

    You then read the study guide (88 pages, 8 1/2 by 11 size, maybe 10 point font but with some pictures) and fill in the remainder of the workbook.

    You take the filled in workbook to a field instruction location where they administer the practicals and I think you need to take a written exam as well.

    I'll let you know how that goes, I am going for it this weekend.

    I think the field piece takes 3 or four hours.

    This is just for a shotgun license. You need to get that first, then you can apply for a rifle/muzzleloader or Bow license afterward. Similar procedures.

    If we have a bear hunt again, that is a separate license that requires I believe an additional 8 hour class.

    My impressions at this point are that this is much more rigorous and time consuming than I expected and I guess it explains why the number of hunters is declining. I just don't see every average Joe being able to make the grade.

    I'm finding it interesting, I just need to get someone to take me out the first time this fall. I know some older guys who hunted but who don't do it anymore - too crowded and dangerous.

    I may just use this license to get a PA one and then try to go there . . . .

    Here is the NJ Fish and Game page that describes the program and gives you some sample tests and such: http://njfishandwildlife.com/hunted.htm
     
  9. whoami

    whoami Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    258
    Location:
    Peoples Demokratik Republik of New Jersey
    That's pretty much exactly why I have little interest in hunting. Regardless of what any stuffed shirt official says, the state for YEARS has been making it more and more difficult for non-hunters to get into the sport. Couple that with the few hunters I knew having a rank level of disdain for my ownership of 'one a them evil assault guns' (AR-15), and it's just not something I feel is worth my time, effort, or money.

    I also find it kinda funny that some of the local towns near me would rather drop thousands upon thousands of dollars on 'sharpshooters' from out of state (Conn. from what I last heard) to help cull the deer population, instead of letting NJ citizens hunt them....
     
  10. 7.62FullMetalJacket

    7.62FullMetalJacket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,991
    Location:
    Cedar City, Utah
    Incrementalism. Same playbook, different subject. Make it ever more difficult in order to discourage an activity. Once that march is complete, then make the holders of "hunting irons" justify their need for "sniper rifles."

    I am beginning to believe that NJ is now holding the official People's Republic title.
     
  11. Vibe

    Vibe Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    192
    Location:
    Arkansas, USA
    Neither
    Firearms ownership is a right.
    Helping the Game and Fish keep the game numbers in check is a SERVICE...they should PAY us for helping them. :D :D :D :neener:
     
  12. scotjute

    scotjute Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    563
    Location:
    Texas
    On your own property it should be a right. On someone else's property, it is a privilege.

    On Government (or public) land, consider the following :

    Its not constitutionally listed in bill of rights, hence it should be up to each state to decide.

    In England, it was generally considered a privilege, since the "deer" were considered to be property of the king. Believe here in US that the wildlife are considered to be under the regulation of the state government, which defines what can be taken and how, etc. The national government only regulates those species which migrate across state lines, such as migratory birds.

    Believe the question would hinge on who owns the animals in question, if the government, then hunting is a privilege, such as in old England. At the same time, the government should be liable for any harm caused by "their" animals.

    If the animals are considered to be owned by the public at large, then hunting is a right that is regulated by the public thru its regulating "arm", the government. In that case, the government would not be liable for damage caused by animals. This explanation would seem to better fit situation here in US.
    Therefore, hunting on Government land is a right regulated by the Gov. for the public, as the Gov. is the regulating arm of the public.
     
  13. WT

    WT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,985
    I believe hunting on your own land is a right. Hunting on the land of others is a privilege. Hunting on public property where others (such as hikers) may be present is also a privilege.
     
  14. Highland Ranger

    Highland Ranger Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,299
    Location:
    New Jersey Highlands
    See I have trouble with that. I know what this stems from, my land, you can't tell me what to do with it (even though government increasingly does anyway.)

    BUT . . . . . then - if you can afford the land then you have the right but if not, then you don't.

    So then rights are for sale? You can buy rights?

    Not sure what bothers me about that but its wrong.
     
  15. 7.62FullMetalJacket

    7.62FullMetalJacket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,991
    Location:
    Cedar City, Utah
    Just try hunting out of season on your land and you will see about your rights.
     
  16. Combat-wombat

    Combat-wombat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,683
    I believe it is a privelege. Yes, to some extent, it is good to even out the population of animals. I have a great love for the envirnoment and nature though. It's one of the few things that I support lots of government regulation on. If hunting is unregulated, many species will face extinction, like what happened with the buffalo in the 1800s.
     
  17. MeekandMild

    MeekandMild Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,877
    Hunting has always been a right of man in Nature. The medieval royalist viewpoint was that it was a privilage given by the crown. Some of us seem to be stuck in the sixteenth century.
     
  18. mercedesrules

    mercedesrules Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,010
    You bought the right to live there, didn't you?

    Don't confuse contractual rights with inalienable ones.

    People that can afford a Cadillac can drive one; people that can't, can't. No violation of rights.

    We sometimes say we have the right to pursue happiness - not to have it.

    MR
     
  19. goalie

    goalie Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,168
    Location:
    Minnetonka, Minnesota
    In Minnesota it is now a right. We passed a state constitutional amendment.

    :D
     
  20. Stebalo

    Stebalo Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    312
    Location:
    Texas
    You are in New Jersey so obviously it is a priveledge.

    In New Jersey, you are not a citizen with rights.

    You are a subject that may grovel for priveledges if you are good.
     
  21. Treylis

    Treylis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,332
    Location:
    Tempe, Arizona
    As long as it's your own land or somebody else's with permission, it's a derivative property right.
     
  22. RAY WOODROW 3RD

    RAY WOODROW 3RD Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    335
    Location:
    Beverly, N.J.
    Treylis..........................

    Not in NJ it is not!

    You see, these are the governors deer.
    You must pass stringent tests to prove you are worthy of hunting his deer.

    Ever meet the wildlife management officers in NJ?
    Glock straped to their side, shades on, trampling through the woods, ruining your hunt because human scent is now all over the damn place, ordering you out of your tree stand so they can check your permission slip, oh, I mean hunting license.
    Measuring your distance from dwellings (meaning unoccupied shacks that are in the pines from 1865 that are falling apart and covered with so much vegitation that you though it was a hill) for the safety requirements.

    A good one used to be how they would catch you around a bait pile that you did not honestly know was there.

    Its all about money.... Follow the money trail.......

    (You can hunt with me and the "Buckeye" during 6-day shotgun as a guest in December if you wish Highland Ranger)
     
  23. Pharley

    Pharley Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Ohio
    I'd say hunting is a privilege. The State of Ohio owns the wildlife. They set regulations (1 buck per year) even on private property. Some states even go as far as to tell you how large a buck's rack must be to shoot it- on your property or not.

    BUT:

    If you have a conviction for a crime of violence, you cannot possess a firearm or dangerous ord.....thus, you cannot hunt. Also, you cannot carry a concealed weapon. There are no repercussions for this. Isn't this a Constitutional violation? On the other hand, violate someone's right to due process or rights against unreasonable search and seizure, and it's a lawsuit.

    Can see both sides.
     
  24. Treylis

    Treylis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,332
    Location:
    Tempe, Arizona
    Reminds me of "Robin Hood". Yet another reason why NJ is a terrible, terrible place. ;-P
     
  25. HiWayMan

    HiWayMan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    895
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    Pharley-

    Convicted felons can still hunt. It just has to be with black powder firearms or archery equipment or some other appropriate device not requiring a metallic cartridge.


    And I must disagree with you. The State of Ohio most assuredly does not own the game.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page