I have been told...

Status
Not open for further replies.

eclancy

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,114
Location
N. Catasauqua, Pa
Gentlemen,
..by many of the old timers that worked at SA in Ordnance on the M1 Garand that as many came back early after WW2 many of the early M1 Garand's below the 1 million mark were not repaired but destroyed. Could this be because of the changes in Receiver Steel done in June/July 1942 to the 8620 ? Could it have been because of the back of the receivers being changed i.e, stronger? Could it be because many of the lead-dip ones are hard to find? It's just some bits of data I have talked about with Ordnance people. I wonder what you guys think.
Thanks again
Clancy
 
pls define "lead dip"

i have a late '30's SA garand that was arsenal rebuilt in '43 and a lend lease to great britan that came home. still, i haven't heard the phrase "lead dip" before...whatcha talkin about?

gunnie
 
tempering?

I do not know if this is what the poster means, but "lead dip" is a method of heat treating steel forgings by quench. That is dipping them in molten lead at some stage during their cooling. An old method.
 
thanks highorder

my take on the info supplied @ link is that it was used to slowly cool the rear reciever by insulating it from the rapid cooling applied to the rest. this would keep same from getting as hard as the fully treated forward portion. i had thought the lead dipping was some kind of plating process to prevent rusting. kinda like galvanizing without the zinc added.

next time i dig out the M1, will CLOSELY inspect reciever for signs of this localized treatment process. is pretty much a designated safe queen due to the rarity of the surviving pre-war models. this feature has gone completely past me on previous occasions.

interesting info, thank you for your reply.

gunnie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top