Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Illinois Governor and Attorney General disagree on appealing 7th Circuit Decision

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Jeff White, Mar 13, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jeff White

    Jeff White Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    19,628
    Location:
    Alma Illinois
    Well our hapless governor is going against the Chicago machine and his possible opponent in the 2014 democrat primary by saying he wants to appeal the 7th Circuit Concealed Carry Decision to SCOTUS.

    http://www.wjbdradio.com/LocalNews/Quinn-Wants-Supreme-Court-Concealed-Carry-Appeal#.UUDS31e_1Ec
    So the question is; Is Madigan wanting to temper her image downstate in preparation for the 2014 gubernatorial election or is she afraid of how this SCOTUS might rule? The 7th Circuit is in conflict with at least one other circuit on this issue so the supremes would likely take the case.

    The one sure thing is that neither Pat Quinn or Lisa Madigan are friends of gun owners and would both cheerfully eliminate guns in all hands but their political cronies if given the chance.
     
  2. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,940
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    Hey, it's not like the legal fees are coming out of his wallet, right?
     
  3. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,433
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    If he wins, he will ride that into the White House, as opposed to the Big House, (Dear Leader has shown Chicago politicians don't go to jail if they go to Washington), but if he LOSES...well, leftists will hunt him for the rest of his unnatural life.
     
  4. joeschmoe

    joeschmoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,291
    They disagree on how to take away the rights of the people, but they agree those rights should be taken away.
     
  5. rugerman07

    rugerman07 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Messages:
    532
    Location:
    Southern Illinois
    I think she and her father, Michael, are both afraid of what SCOTUS might rule and he might have told Lisa to give his very restrictive MAY ISSUE bill a chance before taking it to the supreme court.
     
  6. 627PCFan

    627PCFan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,001
    Location:
    Sterling, VA
    They know how SCOTUS will rule. That's an end game. They are looking for options.
     
  7. powell&hyde

    powell&hyde Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    238
    Location:
    Iowa
    Exactly, this may be the best move for the people of Ill
     
  8. gbran

    gbran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,971
    Location:
    california
    Il just needs to craft a ccw policy that is so ornerous nobody can get one. Why fight in court?

    Pre-Heller, it was impossible to buy and own a handgun. Post Heller it's now only NEARLY impossible to obtain and own a handgun.
     
  9. joeschmoe

    joeschmoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,291
    No that is exactly what DC had done in Heller. DC had a permit process to have a gun, but they denied Heller, and everyone else. SCOTUS said that was an illegal ban. Even though on paper there was a permit process. It's just that no one ever qualified for it.
     
  10. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
    I think she SHOULD appeal to the Supreme Court...

    .. and liberate those poor buggers out in New York from the madness they're under.
     
  11. brickeyee

    brickeyee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2005
    Messages:
    3,135
    remember, the appeals court ruling stands if SCOTUS refuses to take the case.
     
  12. JTHunter

    JTHunter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,385
    Location:
    Southwestern Illinois
    627PCFan said:
    That's true if 1 -they take the case, and 2 - Dumbo doesn't have a chance to alter the SC make-up before the case gets there!

    gbran said:
    They are well on their way to making it "onerous"! See above about the SC.

    Trent and brickeyee both have good points. Trent's idea depends on the SC staying with the current make-up and going our way. That would be good for NY, esp. NYC, Maryland, NJ, CA, and now CO as well.
    I think brickeyee's idea is good but it doesn't address the other states with restrictions as bad as Illinois.
     
  13. KTXdm9

    KTXdm9 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2012
    Messages:
    528
    Location:
    Katy, TX
    Disgusting, isn't it?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page