Individual Development Area (Poll)

Which of the following do you feel you lack the most, or value the most?

  • Ammunition supply

    Votes: 35 35.0%
  • Peripherals for existing firearms (spare parts, mags, optics, etc)

    Votes: 7 7.0%
  • Firearm variety

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • Training (both formal and informal)

    Votes: 47 47.0%
  • Firearm type (belt-feds, .50 BMG, NFA items, etc)

    Votes: 7 7.0%
  • Firearm quantity (having multiple copies of every weapon/having a large quantity of one type)

    Votes: 2 2.0%

  • Total voters
    100
Status
Not open for further replies.

Wes Janson

Member
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
1,962
What area of individual armament/development do you feel that you most lack, or rather prioritize the highest?

Ammunition
Peripherals (Spare parts, magazines, optics)
Firearm variety
Training/Practice
Firearm type
Firearm quantity

Or in other words, if you had several thousand dollars to spend for purposes of being as well-armed and equipped as possible, but could only pick one of the areas in which to spend it, which would you choose and why?
 
A pistol, sufficient magazines, and carry ammo, cost me less than $600. A shotgun and sufficient ammo cost me less than $300. Either I can procure at my leisure.

Significant training takes planning, time, and potentially, a much higher cost. I've been lucky that my employers (US Army, private security) have paid me to receive tactical training, but by no means do I consider it to be sufficient or definitive. Thus, I choose training.
 
I think people are generally afraid to post on these types of thread topics because it always feels like the Man is monitoring them based on the question. Notwithstanding, I need practice, so training is my answer. Of course, I need more ammunition to practice. And I want to shoot other guns of different variety and type. And I should practice using different peripherals, like doing nighttime house clearing drills with flashlight. Therefore, all of the above. ;)
 
Practice, practice, practice. And some good instruction in regards to trigger control, combat shooting, etc. I think I may have some bad habits that need correcting.
 
I voted ammo, but only because I already have some quantity and variety.

This may be a bad attitude, but I've been shooting guns since I was 10 years old and I don't want to be a soldier if I can avoid it. With this in mind, I would choose plain old practice time before I would spend a lot of money on training.
 
Ammo for sure. I'm entering the home stretch with law school, which means even more working for free, more books, bar application and study, and it's throwing out budget way off.

We've depleted all the stores we build up and I'm generally stopping at Wally World on the way to the range to scrounge a couple boxes of shotshells, maybe some 9mm. Mostly shooting .22 on the pistol range, and tightly limiting my trapshooting.

It's gonna really hurt this summer when the weather is nice again and I really, really, really want to shoot six or eight round of trap and throw in a few of skeet. I'll probably max out at two trap and one skeet, and generally stick to two boxes. At 80 rounds of 7.62x54r squirreled away that is probably the sum total of our centerfire rifle ammo for the summer.

It's gonna have to be a pretty restrained summer.

As for training, peripherals, more guns, well, those are on the back burner. Mentally focused elsewhere. I do wish we could pick up a WASR-10 and an STI Spartan before the election, but I don't feel the lack of those nearly as much as the ammo.

Sorry about the sad little whining session here; it seemed the right place.
 
Personally, I voted training, largely because I just haven't had sufficient formal training on any platform. Ammunition I see as being the equivalent of training, but at a worse ratio of learning-per-round. Stockpiling multiple copies of a firearm hasn't really appealed to me much yet, although I can see the advantages. The biggest philosophical split I've had with myself is between expanding platforms (in fear of a ban) and developing ones I already own (ready supply of spare parts, getting scopes for several rifles, buying tools for repair, stockpiling mags). That's a large part of why I posted this poll, to see what others have concluded when faced with the same dilemma. My choice as of late has been to expand platforms as rapidly as possible, in the anticipation that spare parts availability for most things won't change dramatically in the next few years.
 
I think I have everything covered except for NFA items. I've been stockpiling ammo, mags, and spare parts for awhile now and I'm comfortable with it's current level. I target shoot weekly and replace ammo I use either before or immediatly after I use it. Variety is also taken care of, as is training. Refresher training I continue on an individual basis. I do not think much of quantity although I have 4 ARs and 2 FALs. That only leaves NFA. While I don't think NFA weapons are a primary concern, they are nice to have. I do think a .50BMG rifle is a must though. I'm only waiting for the Tulsa gunshow in April to finish that requirement.
 
I lack belt-fed/NFA.

And because I lack that, I also am severely lacking in ammo

I've heard shooting automatic belt-fed weapons is not a good way to assure that you conserve ammo.

Ya dun found yurself oneathem catch twenny twooos!

Me? I just need more money. I spent $2K at the gunshop yesterday and already know where the next $XX,000 would go if I had it...
 
I voted training but ammo would be a close 2nd. I have too many guns but no belt feds!
 
I voted for training, it's the most valuable in my opinion. I was considering voting ammo, however. I'm running a bit low at the moment.
 
Not to be nit-picky, but the poll is flawed.


What area of individual armament/development do you feel that you most lack, or rather prioritize the highest?

In this question, you are really asking two questions, rather than restating one. Therefore, it is tracking two variables.

For instance, I may place more value on "X" -- and my "inventory" of "X" may be sufficient. In my overall plan, I still may recognize that something that I don't value as highly-- say "Y"-- is sorely lacking. My focus may well be to get "Y" up to speed even though I value it less.

But understand, I am a very linear thinker in planning. I make a list and start with the one, and work my way down. It's not the best way, but it works for me. Sadly, I don't usually work on the highest priority first, either. I tend to work on the one that is most easily obtainable and/or cost effective. Once those are out of the way, I start working on the more difficult ones. I guess I like to see progress happening represented by little checkmarks on my list.


For the purpose of discussion, I'll make comments as they pertain to me from your list:

Ammunition: Sorely lacking. I just completely switched my caliber and platforms for my primary and secondary firearms. I'll be getting enough for the basics soon, but I need to work on other things before I seriously begin to stockpile again.

Peripherals (Spare parts, magazines, optics)

Lacking more than I'd like to be. Depending on your platform, there are spare parts you need to keep on hand. This is easily and cheaply fixed in most cases.

In terms of magazines, I think I am OK. I could use a few more (who couldn't?) but I can make do with what I have.

Optics are a HIGH priority for me. I need to put higher quality glass on my LR-308 before deer season comes around again. As for my AR-15, I believe I'll sit on Irons for a while. Before the end of the year, I'll be getting a lower-priced NV optic for it IF I can get a return to zero mount. I have coyote problems that this will work nicely for.

Because quality daytime optics for the 308 is my next major purchase, I'd have to identify it as one of my higher priorities.

Firearm variety

This is actually a hinderance to my overall thinking in terms of MY goals. I like the idea of stocking a fewer number of calibers, but have them well set-up. I don't want to have two calibers that essentially do the same thing, or can be used in the same role with roughly the same effectiveness.

I wouldn't mind having one duplicate of my primary SHTF firearms-- mainly because I want one for Jenn. For some reason, she says she doesn't want one. She's happy with her Glock 19 and Remington 870 magnum. Her thinking is basically that she doesn't need all that since she has me out front.

I appreciate her confidence in me, but it really screws up my justifications to buy more firearms.


Training/Practice

My view is that training and practice are seperate things. I'll explain.

I grew up with some sort of firearm in my hands. I'd HATE to know how much practice I've had in my lifetime of shooting. Upon getting a new platform, I can get to the basics of proficiency with it in a few minutes. They really aren't that hard to figure out, and aiming hasn't really changed from what we knew as kids.

I view practice as getting used to the actual firing of the weapon. This entails loading, safety concerns, aiming, learning its recoil and limitations, and cleaning the firearm. This is the basics of that firearms usage.

Training is a whole different ball of wax. Depending on the training, you'll learn to push the limitations of the firearm and of yourself using it. You'll learn methods of handling the firearm in various conditions that you probably haven't considered or had need to consider as of yet. You may learn to shoot distances or courses where you can gain some useful skills.

So, for this topic, I'll say that I have PLENTY of practice, but I could stand to get some training. Because I consider practice as getting basic proficiency, I have that down at an acceptable level-- for now. There are still other things that I consider to be at a less-than-acceptable level that I need to work on before I revist this area.

Eventually, I plan on doing training of some sort on Handgun, Shotgun, Rifle (marksmanship), and Rifle (Carbine). I've been interested in some sort of long-range rifle training for some time. We really just don't have the opportunity due to our terrain here to shoot beyond 500 yards that often.

Firearm type

This kinda becomes a "preference" question. I'm a believer in form-follows-function. Only the user can define function. Some guys are quite happy with an ultra-reliable rifle that does 4-5 MOA at 100 yards and it will meet their function. For my actual uses, I don't want a 4 MOA rifle. So, recently I did a lot of platform changes by going back to a platform where I can expect and have experienced more accuracy. But that's just me.

So to answer the question, type is important to me as I fine-tune my expectations of the firearms by observing my actual uses. I *hope* that my recent revisions will be my last.

Firearm quantity

As mentioned above, I'd love to have at least one duplicate of what I consider my primary SHTF firearm. I'll probably make some attempts towards that. However, I consider dupicates of any planning point as the absolute LAST priority area.

Depending on what you are preparing for, it may not be progress to have 14 AK's, but not have a single generator.



At any rate, that's my take.


-- John
 
ammo

it is as fuel is to an airplane....
only time you can have too much of it is when you are on fire
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top