Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

information please/ Ruger-S&W

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by michaelp, Jan 18, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. michaelp

    michaelp Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    17
    Location:
    michigan
    I just purchased my first revolver. A ruger GP100. It was used but had only about 100 rounds through it. It was traded in as I was standing there. It looks and feels new. SS with a 4 in. barrel, full shroud and adjustable rear site. I have not shot it yet.

    My concern isd that I was looking at a S&W 66 with a 3 1/4 in barrell and a highvis front site for the same price. I was able to shoot the S&W but not the ruger. (They were at different place). I really liked the S&W and it was very accurate, but could not walk away from the ruger for 329.00.

    Question-- the trigger on the S&W was so smooth and the trigger on the ruger is not. Will this smooth out? The S&W is haunting me.

    I hope that I made the right choice. This is for shooting cans and paper.

    What is the difference between a S&W 66 and a 686?

    Thanks
     
  2. Preacherman

    Preacherman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,309
    Location:
    Louisiana, USA
    You made a good buy - the GP100 is an excellent revolver. The trigger is not as smooth as the S&W, but will become smoother with use, and you can have a gunsmith work on it for you, or buy a set of reduced-power springs that also smooth it up quite a bit.

    The S&W Model 66 is a K-frame revolver, originally designed for .38 Special loads, but upgraded at Bill Jordan's behest to the .357 Magnum load. It's a great weapon, but will wear out if fired constantly with full-power loads - it wasn't designed for this. The 686 is an L-frame revolver, designed to take care of the K-frame's weakness under stress. It is bigger and stronger, and is built to take the stresses of firing lots of .357 Magnum ammo. - but is bulkier too. I prefer the 66's for carry, and train with .38 Special much of the time to ease the stress on them. Of course, I shoot lots of .357 Magnums through my 686 and Rugers as well! :D
     
  3. WESHOOT2

    WESHOOT2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    854
    Location:
    Vermont
    RELAX, BE HAPPY

    I have two GP's, and both have responded to dry-firing.
    Suggest sticking to the stock springs (at least at first) and dry-firing the complete crap out of them, like 10,000 times.
     
  4. jar

    jar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2003
    Messages:
    453
    Location:
    Texas!!!!!
    Remember, that wasn't the last handgun you'll ever buy. All you're debating is the order in which you'll buy them. The Smiths will get you soon enough.:D
     
  5. RCL

    RCL Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Messages:
    530
    Location:
    Western New York
    Michaelp, don't be concerned about your Ruger, you got a good gun. Bought mine used about a year ago, and it quickly became one of my favorite woods bumming and range guns. It's also one of my most accurate revolvers. Shoots tight groups even with the generic factory loads, especially the Federal American Eagle red box load. Seems to like the Sierra bullets.
    Mine has a very good trigger, smooth, crisp and about 3.5 pounds. It was probably worked on at some point before I bought it, new springs probably. My point is, it has the potential. Enjoy your new shooter. :D
     
  6. dairycreek

    dairycreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,459
    Location:
    North Plains, Oregon
    Ya' done good!

    Price is fair and the trigger will smooth out over time. Good shooting:)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page