Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is it overreacting to buy American...

Discussion in 'Legal' started by patentmike, Jun 29, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. patentmike

    patentmike Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2004
    Messages:
    415
    Location:
    Texas
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2005
  2. sumpnz

    sumpnz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,276
    Location:
    Sedro-Woolley, WA
    :scrutiny: :rolleyes: Yeahhh, uh huh.

    So I'm a traitor for buying a second hand CZ rifle and a couple of mil-surps (Swede and Turk mausers) sold to us by their respective governments?

    You might want to find a source that refers for W as something other than "emperor" and that does not refer to Iraq becoming the next Vietnam. Neither such references lend any credence to the source.
     
  3. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    It's a nice patriotic thought to purchase "only American" but it's simply not possible to do so in today's world, or guarantee what you buy is 100% made in the US of A and that all profit made on that product will stay within our borders.

    Not all American products are 100% made in America nowadays (especially true of automobiles, which also label what %age of parts come from where). I've had foreign products break on me and American products break on me. I use what works. With that said, if two items are priced comparably and one is US and the other foreign, it could go either way.

    With that said, I'm pacified and happy my Bushmaster is made in the USA. I even get a sense of pride. But if Bushmaster started churning out crap, I wouldn't have a problem abandoning it altogether and going to another dependable brand, be it foreign or domestic.
     
  4. Drizzt

    Drizzt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,648
    Location:
    Moscow on the Colorado, TX
    Hey, some of those ex-Eastern Bloc countries are now some of the best friends we have on the continent. I know that I, for one, stopped making Polish jokes after hearing about the performance of the Polish Spec Ops personnel in Iraq. Several other countries in that area have also made a point of standing beside us.
     
  5. patentmike

    patentmike Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2004
    Messages:
    415
    Location:
    Texas
    Now, who called you a traitor? And what would mil-surps have to do with anythingt?

    All I know about the source is right there. Maybe someone else could shed some light on it. This is a discussion board right? F-o-r-u-m. Look it up.

    I just happen to think that guns are different from cars or cheese. If foreign gun companies dominate the market while we sleep, "gun control" becomes "import control" and "regulation of foreign-owned companies".
     
  6. R.H. Lee

    R.H. Lee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    7,377
    Location:
    CA
    Europe's not the problem. China is the problem. They already have some 600 billion of our dollars and are increasing that amount some 50-100 billion per year (trade deficit). What do they do with that money? They buy American, of course. American companies, American real estate, American debt (treasury notes).

    Soon we will be OWNED by China, so keep shopping Walmart.
     
  7. odysseus

    odysseus Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    946
    Location:
    US Citizen
    Yes... and now a Unocal buyout bid using equity derived from "loans" at interest rates unavailable to anyone else from the Chinese Government, to a company 70% owned by the Chinese Government. Sounds real free-market to me, but that's a non P.C. opinion I guess...

    BTW, I don't shop at Walmart.
     
  8. sumpnz

    sumpnz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,276
    Location:
    Sedro-Woolley, WA
    Umm, well you kinda implyed in your post, with the link, that buying European made guns was the equivalent of supporting the terrorists in Iraq. Since the mil-surps came from Europe (the respective govt sold their surplus guns to distributers here), that would have about the same effect (according that drivel of an article) as buying a Tikka, CZ, or other European made guns.
    #1 - We'd most likely have significant import restriction (well, more than we already do) long before that would become a way to shut off our only source of new guns. #2 - Foreign companies just won't get the kind of following Springfield, Winchester, Remington, Bushmaster, etc have. Those companies are making guns of equal or better quality than most European manufacturers within their given market segment. Some EU gun companies have their own following (I'm partial to CZ rifles, but I'd also like to have Winchester M70's and Ruger #1B's) but their market share just ain't there right now (except for Glock and to a lesser extent Sig-Sauer in the Pistol market).

    Besides, I figure the best way to motivate American gun (or car) companies to produce better value goods is to only buy from them when they are the best value. Blindly buying "American" even though it may be more expensive (long term) and lower quality does nothing to convice them they need to do a better job.

    I'll also second Drizzt's comment.
     
  9. sumpnz

    sumpnz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,276
    Location:
    Sedro-Woolley, WA
    Riley - 20 years ago they were saying the same thing about the Japanese. I'm not holding my breath.
     
  10. R.H. Lee

    R.H. Lee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    7,377
    Location:
    CA
    Actually, the Japanese are sitting on some $1 trillion American dollars. They are benign compared to China; totally different culture. Remember, China is hardcore communist, Japan is anything but.
     
  11. odysseus

    odysseus Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    946
    Location:
    US Citizen
    Very true. I think saying "we will be owned" is being largess on the topic. However we could be in for quite an economic fight for years to come with increasing geopolitical tensions. Also their isn't a comparison with what Japan was in the 80's and what China is to us in the 2000's.
     
  12. ksnecktieman

    ksnecktieman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,152
    Location:
    Junction City, Kansas
    If you do not buy the best product you can for the least amount of money you can the products will not improve,, American companies that sell less than perfect products should be treated the same as foreign companies that do the same. You will get what you pay for, if you are lucky.

    The capitalist system works, if you think waving a flag makes a difference maybe you should check Wall Street for who owns stock in each company, before you buy. It does not matter to me if hillbilly bubba makes gidgets in korea, or chang su makes them in podunk missouri, I want the best one I can buy for the least amount of money.

    AND, YES, I think that is patriotic, because I think this country can respond, and produce the best for the least, when they decide they have to to sell them.
     
  13. R.H. Lee

    R.H. Lee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    7,377
    Location:
    CA
    I can see who the Walmart shoppers are..................

    China is not engaged in 'capitalism'. It is engaged in producing cheap products with slave labor; there is no way Americans can 'compete' with that. We won't work for .20 cents an hour with the threat of a bullet in the head if we make trouble.

    The reason there is a trade imbalance is because some of us are hooked on that cheap crap like crack addicts.
     
  14. charlesb_la

    charlesb_la Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    115
    Location:
    LA

    From Walmartfacts.com

    Wal-Mart estimates that we purchased about $18 billion from China last year -- about $9 billion imported from direct sources and about $9 billion from indirect sources -- compared to $150 billion spent last year with all kinds of suppliers in the U.S.


    Yeah it's all Walmart's fault
    :rolleyes:
     
  15. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    It would be interesting to know how much profit made off the $18 billion of goods bought from China, compared to the $150 billion from US suppliers.

    My suspicion is they make more money from selling the Chinese goods, than from selling US made goods.
     
  16. odysseus

    odysseus Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    946
    Location:
    US Citizen
    That's a sensitive subject! One that doesn't accept little jabs... I simply don't like MEGA stores. I avoid them when possible.

    Well I am not sure of those stats either. The US suppliers often are also dealing directly with Chinese manufacturers. I dont' have the source, but arond Christmas last year a study documented a high (maybe 90%?) of Walmart products are not US. Suffice to say that this is not just Walmart's issue - but you see they have lobbied Washington strong and hard with big $$$ anything preventing the ease and price they get for these materials, so yes - they are going to recieve jabs.

    Of course the trade imbalance and us tolerating predatory tactics from a non-freemarket economy against US industries is a hard issue to address. Bottomline like Riley says, people can't survive US side on the wages and conditions the Baron's of Chinese industry supply the hand labor there. Perhaps this is something we all accept and buy products without thought. I know i have many China made goods in my place, becuase I had no alternative that made sense...
     
  17. lunaslide

    lunaslide Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    163
    Location:
    Washington
    Honestly, I'm not quite sure what point you're trying to make. Your post doesn't seem to have much to do with the link you provided. Anyway...

    The market now is far more complex and interconnected than it ever was in the past. Making clearly defined boundries about what a foreign company is versus what a domestic company is doesn't make much sense anymore. There are plenty of examples of companies like Toyota and Sigarms that have developed themselves domestically as American businesses that employ American workers, pay taxes to the States they do business in and make our economy stronger.

    Instead of simply "buying American" these days, I'm more concerned with supporting freedom and free markets with my dollars, like investing in companies that are taking the risk to invest in Afganistan and Iraq, or purchasing products from companies that sell products made in countries that support human rights and free markets (such as Cambodia and it's textile industry). I think these things are more important in the long run than being economically isolationist. Supporting free trade around the world helps the societies that participate in it raise themselves to higher standards of living. Thriving economies have no room for tight-fisted, dicatorial rule or luddite notions of theocratic governments like Iran. As the level of trade rises, societies throw off the shackes of government and make way for greater personal freedoms. This is why China is facing in the very near term a massive upheaval of public sentiment from the free marketeers on the coast who want the government to keep it's hands off the booming business and from the poor peasantry of the interior who want to be able to participate in the economic boom. Doing brisk business with China may be benefitting the ruling party in the short term, but in the long term it will undermine their power and bring about changes that mere military confrontation could never make happen.

    Free trade tends to make the world freer in more than just economic ways. The irony of capitalism is that it brings about what communism never managed to accomplish; raising the standard of living for everyone (yes, even the poor). The irony of communism is that it does exactly the opposite of what it claims to do, it drains the resources out of a society and degrades the quality of life for the vast majority of people under it's policies.
     
  18. R.H. Lee

    R.H. Lee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    7,377
    Location:
    CA
    That's misleading. Take Black & Decker, for example. A 'supplier in the U.S.', but all its products are made in China. Bet B&D is included in the $150 billion figure.

    Not slamming Walmart in particular, just using them as a recognizable example. Costco would be another major importer of Chinese products.
     
  19. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    I hate Black & Decker. I burnt out two of their jigsaws and went through a pack of their cheap blades. I gave up and went with a Milwaukee :D

    In general, if a domestic product costs more than a comparable foreign source, it damn well better last/work/perform better.

    Unless we're all millionaires with no financial worries and it is an idealistic world, we could afford the extra 25% (or whatever the average above cost of a foreign comparable product) premium for US made products over a foreign counterpart. However, speaking for myself, I am not financially well off yet and therefore I cannot always justify the (usual) premium for a US product in every consumer decision.

    I try to get the most bang for our buck. Granted, I will buy US-made if it saves me in the long run or if it is an investment(ie US made power tools in my experience don't break down like the cheapos I managed to burn up; I depend on them to get me a paycheck) but if I need some oddball object that doesn't get much use like a set of micro-screwdrivers for repairing eyeglasses or a set of punches that I might use once a year to disassemble a firearm, I'll buy a set of them at the dollar store and not pay a premium for a set of Starretts.
     
  20. charlesb_la

    charlesb_la Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    115
    Location:
    LA
    My point is that blaming Walmart or Costco or any other retailer for the trade imbalance is like blaming guns for gun violence. The problem is the people(shoppers). They vote with their wallet and Walmart and every other retailer gives them what they want. I just get sick and tired of Walmart always being the one singled out. What about BestBuy? Are their any electronics still being produced in the US?

    Why don't you ask them and see....

    http://www.walmartfacts.com/talkwithus/


    Don't get me wrong I buy American whenever I can, I just don't blame the retailers for the growing lack of choice. It's our fellow countrymen and our "gubbermint" that are the problem.
     
  21. auschip

    auschip Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,032
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I fail to see what one person (based in Austria) trying to start a fund to help terrorists, has to do with purchasing products made in European (or more specifically Non-American) countries.

    Following that logic, I shouldn't use any US internet company, because this misguided person has registered an internet address with a US based hosting company.
     
  22. Selfdfenz

    Selfdfenz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    1,955
    Location:
    Small-sky country, again
    Well, no.

    When I buy a CZ product I help keep the light on in the home of a European family or person that may still think the US is ok.

    >>BUT<< I also help keep the lights on in a home in Kansas City of certain people I think pretty highly of.

    Yeah. I give it some thought.

    S-
     
  23. carebear

    carebear Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,373
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    Let the Chinese corporations buy what they want. Corporations are legally private individuals. We'll just "eminent domain" the companies back later.

    For the "public good" of course. :rolleyes:
     
  24. Chris Rhines

    Chris Rhines Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,773
    Location:
    Potomac, Maryland - Behind enemy lines!!
    I greatly prefer to buy non-American products, and do so whenever given the opportunity. I can get better quality for less money by purchasing from nations whose workforces aren't saddled with crippling neosocialist enviromental regulations and labor union thugs.

    - Chris
     
  25. Larry Ashcraft

    Larry Ashcraft Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    11,491
    Location:
    Home of Heroes, Pueblo, CO, USA
    Indeed.

    I'm in the retail awards business (read: trophies). Fifteen years ago the only trophy parts made outside the US were some hardware items (Japan) and some high-end copies of American parts (Japan).

    Now, I am hard-pressed to buy an American made trophy part (and I do try).

    Hint: if you want an American made trophy, specify to your dealer that the trophy be made from parts made by Plastic Dress Up Company only. They are the last bastions of American made parts. www.pdu.com

    In other words, as said above, DON'T BLAME THE RETAILERS. We don't have much choice. PDU doesn't make everything, and the customer doesn't usually want to pay the price difference.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page