Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is the ATF advising dealers not to accept transfers from nonFFL?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by BobinIL, Feb 28, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BobinIL

    BobinIL Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    3
    I purchased a gun from an internet sight today and went to 4 different FFL dealers before I found one that would accept a gun from a non-FFL holder. Either all the dealers in my area have gotten their heads together to stick it to Internet purchases or something else is going on.
     
  2. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,949
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    No. Some dealers just have a policy of not accepting shipments from non-licensees.
     
  3. mgmorden

    mgmorden Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,576
    Location:
    Charleston, South Carolina
    On another board I frequent (Graybeards), the site owner contacted the BATF and was specifically told that you needed to do FFL to FFL.

    Whether that's preemptive on their parts or a real rule, or just a clueless person on the phone, I'm not sure, but that was their line when asked about it.
     
  4. RX-178

    RX-178 Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,647
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    From what I understand, it's a CYA move.

    It's apparently an all-too-common phenomenon, that the FFL will receive a firearm from a non-FFL holder, and then have the buyer refuse the complete the transfer, for whatever reason.

    Well, now that firearm is in their bound book, and they can't just ship it back to the original owner. They're stuck with it until they can find someone to buy it from them.

    FFL to FFL, they are at least reasonably sure that if there's an issue where the buyer refuses to complete the transfer (including defects in the firearm), they can send it back.
     
  5. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18,302
    Location:
    Ft. Worth
    Clueless I suspect. Not even remotely close to illegal. It's done all the time.

    Straight from the ATF website:

     
  6. karlsgunbunker

    karlsgunbunker Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    535
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Most FFL's that refuse to accept shipment from Non-FFL's are just fed up.
    You get firearms with no paperwork, nothing, nada.
    All a FFL needs is the name and address of the shipper and the name and contact info of the buyer.
    After having many guns shipped with out this minimum amount of paperwork, they just get fed up.
    It's just easier to accept shipments from FFL's, they either send a copy of their FFL or will fax one as needed.

    I have received several firearms with no idea who they were going to.

    It's just common sense, Put a Note in the box, your name and address, and name, address and phone number of the recipient.

    To much to expect from some folks, thus the FFL to FFL only policies.
     
  7. Bubbles

    Bubbles Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    3,152
    Location:
    Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia
    So have we, but that's not an issue as we figure at some point we'll get a phone call asking if the gun has arrived yet. It's much worse when there's no paper on the sender and the return address lists "J Smith" at "Bubba's Shipping Emporium, Box XX..."
     
  8. jerkface11

    jerkface11 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    5,499
    Location:
    Arkansas
    LOL that poor dealer stuck having to sell a gun they have $0 invested in it's a TRAVESTY!!!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page