DrDremel, not sure I agree that the weight difference is much of a factor. According the the Kel Tec website there's only 0.6 oz difference between the two pistols with loaded magazines.
I do agree that at least for me, the P-32 is a better carry gun. One additional factor besides the difficulty of racking the P-3AT slide under stress is the increased likelyhood that you may have "limpwrist" failures under stress or when injured. In real world self-defence all kinds of things can make it a less than ideal scenario.
I want a gun that's most likely to fire all its loaded rounds under adverse conditions. I'd rather end up with 8 or 9 rounds of .32ACP (without reloading) than what may turn out to be a single shot of .380.
Others may wish to take their chances on the more powerful (and more risky) P-3AT. That doesn't necessarily make them wrong. "Different strokes, for different folks."
Alan
I do agree that at least for me, the P-32 is a better carry gun. One additional factor besides the difficulty of racking the P-3AT slide under stress is the increased likelyhood that you may have "limpwrist" failures under stress or when injured. In real world self-defence all kinds of things can make it a less than ideal scenario.
I want a gun that's most likely to fire all its loaded rounds under adverse conditions. I'd rather end up with 8 or 9 rounds of .32ACP (without reloading) than what may turn out to be a single shot of .380.
Others may wish to take their chances on the more powerful (and more risky) P-3AT. That doesn't necessarily make them wrong. "Different strokes, for different folks."
Alan